Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cue‐triggered ‘wanting’ for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement
dc.contributor.author | Peciña, Susana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Berridge, Kent C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-18T18:33:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-01T15:53:22Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2013-05 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Peciña, Susana ; Berridge, Kent C. (2013). "Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cueâ triggered â wantingâ for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement." European Journal of Neuroscience 37(9): 1529-1540. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98326> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0953-816X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1460-9568 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98326 | |
dc.description.abstract | Pavlovian cues [conditioned stimulus ( CS +)] often trigger intense motivation to pursue and consume related reward [unconditioned stimulus ( UCS )]. But cues do not always trigger the same intensity of motivation. Encountering a reward cue can be more tempting on some occasions than on others. What makes the same cue trigger more intense motivation to pursue reward on a particular encounter? The answer may be the level of incentive salience (‘wanting’) that is dynamically generated by mesocorticolimbic brain systems, influenced especially by dopamine and opioid neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens ( NA c) at that moment. We tested the ability of dopamine stimulation (by amphetamine microinjection) vs. mu opioid stimulation [by d‐Ala, nMe‐Phe, Glyol‐enkephalin ( DAMGO ) microinjection] of either the core or shell of the NA c to amplify cue‐triggered levels of motivation to pursue sucrose reward, measured with a Pavlovian‐Instrumental Transfer ( PIT ) procedure, a relatively pure assay of incentive salience. Cue‐triggered ‘wanting’ in PIT was enhanced by amphetamine or DAMGO microinjections equally, and also equally at nearly all sites throughout the entire core and medial shell (except for a small far‐rostral strip of shell). NA c dopamine/opioid stimulations specifically enhanced CS + ability to trigger phasic peaks of ‘wanting’ to obtain UCS , without altering baseline efforts when CS + was absent. We conclude that dopamine/opioid stimulation throughout nearly the entire NA c can causally amplify the reactivity of mesocorticolimbic circuits, and so magnify incentive salience or phasic UCS ‘wanting’ peaks triggered by a CS +. Mesolimbic amplification of incentive salience may explain why a particular cue encounter can become irresistibly tempting, even when previous encounters were successfully resisted before. Surges in the level of motivation elicited by reward cues (i.e., changes cue‐triggered ‘wanting’) are mediated by opioid and‐or dopamine stimulations that increase reactivity of mesocorticolimbic brain circuits involving the nucleus accumbens, which dynamically compute incentive salience for a cue. Nearly the entire medial shell and the entire core can similarly mediate dopamine and opioid enhancements. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Rodale Press (Macmillan) | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Motivation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Rat | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Fos Mapping | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Liking | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Amphetamine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | DAMGO | en_US |
dc.title | Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cue‐triggered ‘wanting’ for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Neurosciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23495790 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98326/1/ejn12174.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ejn.12174 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | European Journal of Neuroscience | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Saddoris, M.P., Stamatakis, A. & Carelli, R.M. ( 2011 ) Neural correlates of Pavlovian‐to‐instrumental transfer in the nucleus accumbens shell are selectively potentiated following cocaine self‐administration. Eur. J. Neurosci., 33, 2274 – 2287. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Saunders, B.T. & Robinson, T.E. ( 2012 ) The role of dopamine in the accumbens core in the expression of Pavlovian‐conditioned responses. Eur. J. Neurosci., 36, 2521 – 32. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shiflett, M.W. & Balleine, B.W. ( 2010 ) At the limbic‐motor interface: disconnection of basolateral amygdala from nucleus accumbens core and shell reveals dissociable components of incentive motivation. Eur. J. Neurosci., 32, 1735 – 1743. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shin, A.C., Pistell, P.J., Phifer, C.B. & Berthoud, H.R. ( 2010 ) Reversible suppression of food reward behavior by chronic mu‐opioid receptor antagonism in the nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience, 170, 580 – 588. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith, K.S. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2005 ) The ventral pallidum and hedonic reward: neurochemical maps of sucrose “liking” and food intake. J. Neurosci., 25, 8637 – 8649. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith, K.S., Berridge, K.C. & Aldridge, J.W. ( 2011 ) Disentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 255 – 264. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Taha, S.A., Katsuura, Y., Noorvash, D., Seroussi, A. & Fields, H.L. ( 2009 ) Convergent, not serial, striatal and pallidal circuits regulate opioid‐induced food intake. Neuroscience, 161, 718 – 733. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Talmi, D., Seymour, B., Dayan, P. & Dolan, R. ( 2008 ) Human pavlovian‐instrumental transfer. J. Neurosci., 28, 360 – 368. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thompson, R.H. & Swanson, L.W. ( 2010 ) Hypothesis‐driven structural connectivity analysis supports network over hierarchical model of brain architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 15235 – 15239. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tindell, A.J., Smith, K.S., Berridge, K.C. & Aldridge, J.W. ( 2009 ) Dynamic computation of incentive salience: “wanting” what was never “liked”. J. Neurosci., 29, 12220 – 12228. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Van Ree, J.M., Niesink, R.J., Van Wolfswinkel, L., Ramsey, N.F., Kornet, M.M., Van Furth, W.R., Vanderschuren, L.J., Gerrits, M.A. & Van den Berg, C.L. ( 2000 ) Endogenous opioids and reward. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 405, 89 – 101. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vanderschuren, L.J. & Pierce, R.C. ( 2010 ) Sensitization processes in drug addiction. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci., 3, 179 – 195. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Volkow, N.D., Fowler, J.S. & Wang, G.J. ( 2004 ) The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology, 47, 3 – 13. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Voorn, P., Gerfen, C.R. & Groenewegen, H.J. ( 1989 ) Compartmental organization of the ventral striatum of the rat: immunohistochemical distribution of enkephalin, substance P, dopamine, and calcium‐binding protein. J. Comp. Neurol., 289, 189 – 201. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Walker, K.C. ( 1942 ) The effect of a discriminative stimulus transferred to a previously unassociated response. J. Exp. Psychol., 31, 312 – 321. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wassum, K.M., Ostlund, S.B., Balleine, B.W. & Maidment, N.T. ( 2011 ) Differential dependence of Pavlovian incentive motivation and instrumental incentive learning processes on dopamine signaling. Learn. Memory, 18, 475 – 483. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wyvell, C.L. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2000 ) Intra‐accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward “wanting” without enhanced “liking” or response reinforcement. J. Neurosci., 20, 8122 – 8130. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wyvell, C.L. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2001 ) Incentive‐sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: Increased cue‐triggered ‘wanting’ for sucrose reward. J. Neurosci., 21, 7831 – 7840. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zahm, D.S. & Brog, J.S. ( 1992 ) On the significance of subterritories in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum. Neuroscience, 50, 751 – 767. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zahm, D.S., Parsley, K.P., Schwartz, Z.M. & Cheng, A.Y. ( 2012 ) On lateral septum‐like characteristics of outputs from the accumbal hedonic ‘hotspot’ of Pecina and Berridge with commentary on the transitional nature of basal forebrain ‘boundaries’. J. Comp. Neurol., 521, 50 – 68. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zhang, M. & Kelley, A.E. ( 2002 ) Intake of saccharin, salt, and ethanol solutions is increased by infusion of a mu opioid agonist into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology, 159, 415 – 423. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zhang, M., Balmadrid, C. & Kelley, A.E. ( 2003 ) Nucleus accumbens opioid, GABaergic, and dopaminergic modulation of palatable food motivation: contrasting effects revealed by a progressive ratio study in the rat. Behav. Neurosci., 117, 202 – 211. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zhang, J., Berridge, K.C., Tindell, A.J., Smith, K.S. & Aldridge, J.W. ( 2009 ) A neural computational model of incentive salience. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000437. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ambroggi, F., Ghazizadeh, A., Nicola, S.M. & Fields, H.L. ( 2011 ) Roles of nucleus accumbens core and shell in incentive‐cue responding and behavioral inhibition. J. Neurosci., 31, 6820 – 6830. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bakshi, V.P. & Kelley, A.E. ( 1993 ) Striatal regulation of morphine‐induced hyperphagia: an anatomical mapping study. Psychopharmacology, 111, 207 – 214. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baldo, B.A. & Kelley, A.E. ( 2007 ) Discrete neurochemical coding of distinguishable motivational processes: insights from nucleus accumbens control of feeding. Psychopharmacology, 191, 439 – 459. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Barbano, M.F., Le Saux, M. & Cador, M. ( 2009 ) Involvement of dopamine and opioids in the motivation to eat: influence of palatability, homeostatic state, and behavioral paradigms. Psychopharmacology, 203, 475 – 487. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berridge, C.W., Stratford, T.L., Foote, S.L. & Kelley, A.E. ( 1997 ) Distribution of dopamine beta‐hydroxylase‐like immunoreactive fibers within the shell subregion of the nucleus accumbens. Synapse, 27, 230 – 241. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berridge, K.C. ( 2012 ) From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. Eur. J. Neurosci., 35, 1124 – 1143. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berthoud, H.R. & Morrison, C. ( 2008 ) The brain, appetite, and obesity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 55 – 92. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bodnar, R.J. ( 2004 ) Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30‐year historical perspective. Peptides, 25, 697 – 725. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bray, S., Rangel, A., Shimojo, S., Balleine, B. & O'Doherty, J.P. ( 2008 ) The neural mechanisms underlying the influence of pavlovian cues on human decision making. J. Neurosci., 28, 5861 – 5866. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cacciapaglia, F., Saddoris, M.P., Wightman, R.M. & Carelli, R.M. ( 2012 ) Differential dopamine release dynamics in the nucleus accumbens core and shell track distinct aspects of goal‐directed behavior for sucrose. Neuropharmacology, 62, 2050 – 2056. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cardinal, R.N., Parkinson, J.A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B.J. ( 2002 ) Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. R., 26, 321 – 352. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chaudhri, N., Sahuque, L.L., Schairer, W.W. & Janak, P.H. ( 2012 ) Separable roles of the nucleus accumbens core and shell in context‐ and cue‐induced alcohol‐seeking. Neuropsychopharmacol., 35, 783 – 791. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Corbit, L.H. & Balleine, B.W. ( 2005 ) Double Dissociation of Basolateral and Central Amygdala Lesions on the General and Outcome‐Specific Forms of Pavlovian‐Instrumental Transfer. J. Neurosci., 25, 962 – 970. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Corbit, L.H., Muir, J.L. & Balleine, B.W. ( 2001 ) The role of the nucleus accumbens in instrumental conditioning: Evidence of a functional dissociation between accumbens core and shell. J. Neurosci., 21, 3251 – 3260. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Corbit, L.H., Janak, P.H. & Balleine, B.W. ( 2007 ) General and outcome‐specific forms of Pavlovian‐instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area. Eur. J. Neurosci., 26, 3141 – 3149. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Crombag, H.S., Galarce, E.M. & Holland, P.C. ( 2008 ) Pavlovian influences on goal‐directed behavior in mice: the role of cue‐reinforcer relations. Learn. Memory, 15, 299 – 303. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Di Chiara, G., Bassareo, V., Fenu, S., De Luca, M.A., Spina, L., Cadoni, C., Acquas, E., Carboni, E., Valentini, V. & Lecca, D. ( 2004 ) Dopamine and drug addiction: the nucleus accumbens shell connection. Neuropharmacology, 47, 227 – 241. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dickinson, A., Smith, J. & Mirenowicz, J. ( 2000 ) Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists. Behav. Neurosci., 114, 468 – 483. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | DiFeliceantonio, A.G. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2012 ) Which cue to ‘want’? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal‐trackers show stronger goal‐tracking, just as sign‐trackers show stronger sign‐tracking. Behav. Brain Res., 230, 399 – 408. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Estes, W.K. ( 1943 ) Discriminative conditioning. I. A discriminative property of conditioned anticipation. J. Exp. Psychol., 32, 150 – 155. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Everitt, B.J. & Robbins, T.W. ( 2005 ) Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat. Neurosci., 8, 1481 – 1489. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Everitt, B.J. & Wolf, M.E. ( 2002 ) Psychomotor stimulant addiction: A neural systems perspective. J. Neurosci., 22, 3312 – 3320. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Farooqi, I.S. & O'Rahilly, S. ( 2009 ) Leptin: a pivotal regulator of human energy homeostasis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 89, 980S – 984S. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Farooqi, I.S., Bullmore, E., Keogh, J., Gillard, J., O'Rahilly, S. & Fletcher, P.C. ( 2007 ) Leptin regulates striatal regions and human eating behavior. Science, 317, 1355. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Faure, A., Richard, J.M. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2010 ) Desire and dread from the nucleus accumbens: cortical glutamate and subcortical GABA differentially generate motivation and hedonic impact in the rat. PLoS ONE, 5, e11223. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Flagel, S.B., Clark, J.J., Robinson, T.E., Mayo, L., Czuj, A., Willuhn, I., Akers, C.A., Clinton, S.M., Phillips, P.E. & Akil, H. ( 2011 ) A selective role for dopamine in stimulus‐reward learning. Nature, 469, 53 – 57. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hall, J., Parkinson, J.A., Connor, T.M., Dickinson, A. & Everitt, B.J. ( 2001 ) Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci., 13, 1984 – 1992. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holland, P.C. ( 2004 ) Relations between Pavlovian‐instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B., 30, 104 – 117. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holland, P.C. & Gallagher, M. ( 2003 ) Double dissociation of the effects of lesions of basolateral and central amygdala on conditioned stimulus‐potentiated feeding and Pavlovian‐instrumental transfer. Eur. J. Neurosci., 17, 1680 – 1694. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ikemoto, S. ( 2007 ) Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens‐olfactory tubercle complex. Brain Res. Rev., 56, 27 – 78. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ikemoto, S. & Wise, R.A. ( 2004 ) Mapping of chemical trigger zones for reward. Neuropharmacology, 47 ( Suppl 1 ), 190 – 201. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kelley, A.E. ( 2004 ) Ventral striatal control of appetitive motivation: role in ingestive behavior and reward‐related learning. Neurosci. Biobehav. R., 27, 765 – 776. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kelley, A.E., Baldo, B.A., Pratt, W.E. & Will, M.J. ( 2005 ) Corticostriatal‐hypothalamic circuitry and food motivation: Integration of energy, action and reward. Physiol. Behav., 86, 773 – 795. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kessler, D.A. ( 2009 ) The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite. Rodale Press (Macmillan), New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kim, E.M., Quinn, J.G., Levine, A.S. & O'Hare, E. ( 2004 ) A bi‐directional mu‐opioid‐opioid connection between the nucleus of the accumbens shell and the central nucleus of the amygdala in the rat. Brain Res., 1029, 135 – 139. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Laurent, V., Leung, B., Maidment, N. & Balleine, B.W. ( 2012 ) μ‐ and δ‐Opioid‐Related Processes in the Accumbens Core and Shell Differentially Mediate the Influence of Reward‐Guided and Stimulus‐Guided Decisions on Choice. J. Neurosci., 32, 1875 – 1883. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Levine, A.S. & Billington, C.J. ( 2004 ) Opioids as agents of reward‐related feeding: a consideration of the evidence. Physiol. Behav., 82, 57 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lex, A. & Hauber, W. ( 2008 ) Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell mediate Pavlovian‐instrumental transfer. Learn. Memory, 15, 483 – 491. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mahler, S.V. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2009 ) Which cue to “want?” Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue. J. Neurosci., 29, 6500 – 6513. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mucha, R.F. & Iversen, S.D. ( 1986 ) Increased food intake after opioid microinjections into nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat. Brain Res., 397, 214 – 224. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | O'Connor, E.C., Stephens, D.N. & Crombag, H.S. ( 2010 ) Modeling appetitive Pavlovian‐instrumental interactions in mice. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci., 8, 8.25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ostlund, S.B. & Maidment, N.T. ( 2012 ) Dopamine Receptor Blockade Attenuates the General Incentive Motivational Effects of Noncontingently Delivered Rewards and Reward‐Paired Cues Without Affecting Their Ability to Bias Action Selection. Neuropsychopharmacol., 37, 508 – 519. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Palmiter, R.D. ( 2007 ) Is dopamine a physiologically relevant mediator of feeding behavior? Trends Neurosci., 30, 375 – 381. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paxinos, G. & Watson, C. ( 1996 ) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peciña, S. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2000 ) Opioid eating site in accumbens shell mediates food intake and hedonic ‘liking’: map based on microinjection Fos plumes. Brain Res., 863, 71 – 86. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peciña, S. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2005 ) Hedonic hot spot in nucleus accumbens shell: Where do mu‐opioids cause increased hedonic impact of sweetness? J. Neurosci., 25, 11777 – 11786. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peciña, S., Schulkin, J. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2006 ) Nucleus accumbens corticotropin‐releasing factor increases cue‐triggered motivation for sucrose reward: paradoxical positive incentive effects in stress? BMC Biol., 4, 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pielock, S.M., Lex, B. & Hauber, W. ( 2011 ) The role of dopamine in the dorsomedial striatum in general and outcome‐selective Pavlovian‐instrumental transfer. Eur. J. Neurosci., 33, 717 – 725. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ragnauth, A., Moroz, M. & Bodnar, R.J. ( 2000 ) Multiple opioid receptors mediate feeding elicited by mu and delta opioid receptor subtype agonists in the nucleus accumbens shell in rats. Brain Res., 876, 76 – 87. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reynolds, S.M. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2002 ) Positive and negative motivation in nucleus accumbens shell: Bivalent rostrocaudal gradients for GABA‐elicited eating, taste “liking”/”disliking” reactions, place preference/avoidance, and fear. J. Neurosci., 22, 7308 – 7320. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reynolds, S.M. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2008 ) Emotional environments retune the valence of appetitive versus fearful functions in nucleus accumbens. Nat. Neurosci., 11, 423 – 425. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Richard, J.M. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2011 ) Metabotropic glutamate receptor blockade in nucleus accumbens shell shifts affective valence towards fear and disgust. Eur. J. Neurosci., 33, 736 – 747. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Robinson, T.E. & Berridge, K.C. ( 1993 ) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive‐sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Rev., 18, 247 – 291. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Robinson, T.E. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2003 ) Addiction. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 54, 25 – 53. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Robinson, T.E. & Berridge, K.C. ( 2008 ) Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B., 363, 3137 – 3146. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.