View Item 

Show simple item record

Default Probability
dc.contributor.authorOsherson, Daniel N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStern, Joshuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilkie, Ormonden_US
dc.contributor.authorStob, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Edward E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T18:33:31Z
dc.date.available2013-06-18T18:33:31Z
dc.date.issued1991-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationOsherson, Daniel N.; Stern, Joshua; Wilkie, Ormond; Stob, Michael; Smith, Edward E. (1991). "Default Probability." Cognitive Science 15(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98402>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0364-0213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1551-6709en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98402
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherLawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.en_US
dc.titleDefault Probabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherI.D.I.A.P.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCalvin Collegeen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98402/1/s15516709cog1502_3.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1207/s15516709cog1502_3en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCognitive Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, E., Osherson, D., Rips, L., & Keane, M. ( 1988 ) Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. Cognitive Science, 12, 485 – 527.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern, J. ( 1991 ). Default reasoning about probability. Unpublished manuscript.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A. ( 1977 ). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.). ( 1989 ). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaron, J. ( 1988 ). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, A., & Michalski, R. ( 1989 ). The logic of plausible reasoning: A core theory. Cognitive Science, 13, 1 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEstes, W.K. ( 1976 ). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGregson, R. ( 1975 ). Psychometrics of similarity. New York: Academic.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorwich, P. ( 1982 ). Probability and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaynes, E.T. ( 1979 ). Where do we stand on maximum entropy? In R.D. Levine & M. Tribus (Eds.), The maximum entropy formalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy, G., & Medin, D. ( 1985 ). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289 – 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMyers, T., & Osherson, D. (in press). On the psychological appeal of the maximum entropy principle.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNisbett, R., Krantz, D., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. ( 1983 ). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339 – 363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOsherson, D., Smith, E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A., & Shafir, E. ( 1990 ). Category‐based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParl, J. ( 1988 ). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligence systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan‐Kaufmann.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRips, L. ( 1989 ). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShafir, E., Smith, E., & Osherson, D. (in press). Typicality and reasoning fallacies. Memory and Cognition.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
s15516709cog1502_3.pdf
Size:
1.264MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.