Show simple item record

Pain Intervention for Infant Lumbar Puncture in the Emergency Department: Physician Practice and Beliefs

dc.contributor.authorHoyle, John D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Alexander J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReischman, Diann E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Elizabeth C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBorgialli, Dominic A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahajan, Prashant V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTrytko, Jeff A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStanley, Rachel M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-08T17:45:17Z
dc.date.available2013-07-08T17:45:17Z
dc.date.issued2011-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationHoyle, John D.; Rogers, Alexander J.; Reischman, Diann E.; Powell, Elizabeth C.; Borgialli, Dominic A.; Mahajan, Prashant V.; Trytko, Jeff A.; Stanley, Rachel M. (2011). "Pain Intervention for Infant Lumbar Puncture in the Emergency Department: Physician Practice and Beliefs." Academic Emergency Medicine 18(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98758>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98758
dc.description.abstractObjectives:  The objectives were to characterize physician beliefs and practice of analgesia and anesthesia use for infant lumbar puncture (LP) in the emergency department (ED) and to determine if provider training type, experience, and beliefs are associated with reported pain intervention use. Methods:  An anonymous survey was distributed to ED faculty and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows at five Midwestern hospitals. Questions consisted of categorical, yes/no, descriptive, and incremental responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with confidence intervals (CIs) and odds ratios (ORs). Results:  A total of 156 of 164 surveys (95%) distributed were completed and analyzed. Training background of respondents was 52% emergency medicine (EM), 30% PEM, and 18% pediatrics. Across training types, there was no difference in the belief that pain treatment was worthwhile (overall 78%) or in the likelihood of using at least one pain intervention. Pharmacologic pain interventions (sucrose, injectable lidocaine, and topical anesthetic) were used in the majority of LPs by 20, 29, and 27% of respondents, respectively. Nonpharmacologic pain intervention (pacifier/nonnutritive sucking) was used in the majority of LPs by 67% of respondents. Many respondents indicated that they never used sucrose (53%), lidocaine (41%), or anesthetic cream (49%). Physicians who thought pain treatment was worthwhile were more likely to use both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain interventions than those who did not (93% vs. 53%, OR = 10.98, 95% CI = 4.16 to 29.00). The number of LPs performed or supervised per year was not associated with pain intervention use. Other than pacifiers, injectable lidocaine was the most frequently reported pain intervention. Conclusions:  Provider beliefs regarding infant pain are associated with variation in anesthesia and analgesia use during infant LP in the ED. Although the majority of physicians hold the belief that pain intervention is worthwhile in this patient group, self‐reported pharmacologic interventions to reduce pain associated with infant LP are used regularly by less than one‐third. Strategies targeting physician beliefs on infant pain should be developed to improve pain intervention use in the ED for infant LPs.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titlePain Intervention for Infant Lumbar Puncture in the Emergency Department: Physician Practice and Beliefsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University/Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital (JDH), Grand Rapids, MI; the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Michigan (AJR, RMS), Ann Arbor, MI; the Grand Rapids Medical Education and Research Center/Michigan State University (DER), Grand Rapids, MI; the Children’s Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (ECP), Chicago, IL; the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Hurley Medical Center (DAB), Flint, MI; the Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Michigan (PVM), Detroit, MI; and the Spectrum Health Research/Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital (JAT), Grand Rapids, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21314772en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98758/1/j.1553-2712.2010.00970.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00970.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarraccio C, Feinberg P, Hart L, Quinn M, King J, Lichenstein R. Lidocaine for lumbar punctures: a help not a hindrance. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996; 150: 1044 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisman S, Berstein B, Schecter N. Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152: 147 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYamada J, Stinson J, Lamba J, Dickson A, McGrath PJ, Stevens B. A review of systematic reviews on pain interventions in hospitalized infants. Pain Res Manag. 2008; 13: 413 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyle EM, Freer Y, Khan‐Orakzai Z, et al. Sucrose and non‐nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2006; 91: F166 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers AJ, Greenwald MH, Deguzman MA, Kelley ME, Simon HK. A randomized, controlled trial of sucrose analgesia in infants younger than 90 days of age who require bladder catheterization in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 617 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaddio A, Ohlsson A, Einarson TR, Stevens B, Koren G. A systematic review of lidocaine‐prolocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998; 101: 1 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaxter AL, Fisher RG, Burke BL, Goldblatt SS, Isaacman DJ. Local anesthetic and stylet styles: factors associated with resident lumbar puncture success. Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 876 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSouth MM, Strauss RA, South AP, Boggess JF, Thorp JM. The use of non‐nutritive sucking to decrease the physiologic pain response during neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 537 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchultz M, Loughran‐Fowlds A, Spence K. Neonatal pain: a comparison of the beliefs and practices of junior doctors and current best evidence. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010; 46: 23 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmory MP, Christopher NC, Kriwinsky J. Pain management in the emergency department: patterns of analgesic utilization. Pediatrics. 1997; 99: 711 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelbst SM, Clark M. Analgesic use in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19: 1010 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown JC, Klein EJ, Lewis CW, Johnston BD, Cummings P. Emergency department analgesia for fracture pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 42: 197 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinherio J, Furdon S, Ochoa L. Role of local anesthesia during lumbar puncture in neonates. Pediatrics. 1993; 91: 379 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuinn M, Carraccio C, Sacchetti A. Pain, punctures and pediatricians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993; 9: 12 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreakey VR, Pirie J, Goldman RD. Pediatric and emergency medicine residents’ attitudes and practices for analgesia and sedation during lumbar puncture in pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2007; 119: e631 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010; 26: 357 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRupp T, Delaney KA. Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43: 494 – 503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRitsema TS, Kelen GD, Pronovost PJ, Pham JC. The national trend in quality of emergency department pain management for long bone fractures. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 163 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimpello LB, Khine H, Avner JR. Practice patterns of pediatric versus general emergency physicians for pain managment of fractures in pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004; 228 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander J, Manno M. Underuse of analgesia in very young pediatric patieints with isolated painful injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41: 617 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauswald M, Anison C. Prescribing analgesics: the effect of patient age and physician specialty. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997; 13: 262 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoley KM. Improving palliative care for cancer: a national and international perspective. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 99: S213 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, et al. American Pain Society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 1574 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGausche‐Hill M, Schmitz C, Lewis RJ. Pediatric preparedness of U.S. emergency departments: a 2003 survey. Pediatrics. 2007; 120: 1229 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnand KJ; International Evidence‐Based Group for Neonatal Pain. Consensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155: 173 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Joint Commission. Pain Management Standards for 2001. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/NewsRoom/health_care_issues.htm. Accessed Oct 28, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBatton DG, Barrington KJ, Wallman C. Prevention and management of pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 2231 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrince W, Horns KM, Latta TM, Gerstmann DR. Treatment of neonatal pain without a gold standard: the case for care giving interventions and sucrose administration. Neonat Netw. 2004; 23: 33 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnand KJ. Effects of perinatal pain and stress. Prog Brain Res. 2000; 22: 117 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnand KJ. Pain plasticity and premature birth: a prescription for premature suffering? Nature Med. 2000; 6: 971 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnand KJ, Coskun V, Thrivikraman KV, Nemerhoff CB, Plotsky PM. Long term behavioral effects of repetitive pain in neonatal rat pups. Phys Behav. 1999; 66: 627 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston CC, Stevens BJ. Experience in a neonatal intensive care unit affects pain response. Pediatrics. 1996; 98: 925 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZempsky WT, Schechter NL. What’s new in the management of pain in children. Pediatr Rev. 2003; 24: 337 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuda MA, Ling QD, Hohmann AG, Peng YB, Tachibana T. Altered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation. Science. 2000; 289: 628 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaddio A, Goldback M, Ipp M, Stevens B, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during vaccination in boys. Lancet. 1995; 345: 291 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaddio A, Shah V, Gilbert‐McLeod C, Katz J. Conditioning and hyperalgesia in newborns exposed to repeated heel lances. JAMA. 2002; 288: 857 – 61.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.