Show simple item record

Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks

dc.contributor.authorGerber, Elisabeth R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Adam Douglasen_US
dc.contributor.authorLubell, Marken_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-08T17:45:21Z
dc.date.available2014-09-02T14:12:52Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationGerber, Elisabeth R.; Henry, Adam Douglas; Lubell, Mark (2013). "Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks." American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 598-610. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98763>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0092-5853en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-5907en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98763
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherNBER Working Paperen_US
dc.titlePolitical Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98763/1/ajps12011.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajps.12011en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Political Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrfield, Myron. 1997. Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and the Lincoln Land Institute.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorris, Donald F. 2001. “ Prospects for Regional Governance under the New Regionalism: Economic Imperatives versus Political Impediments.” Journal of Urban Affairs 23 ( 5 ): 557 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePage, Benjamin, and Robert Shapiro. 1983. “ Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77: 175 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins, Garry, Pip Pattison, Yuval Kalish, and Dean Lusher. 2007a. “ An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks 29 ( 2 ): 173 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins, Garry, Tom Snijders, Peng Wang, Mark Handcock, and Philippa Pattison. 2007b. “ Recent Developments in Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks 29 ( 2 ): 192 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers, Everett M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantos, Francisco C., J. F. Rodrigues, and Jorge M. Pacheco. 2005. “ Epidemic Spreading and Cooperation Dynamics on Homogeneous Small‐World Networks.” Physical Review E 72 ( 5 ): 56 – 128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider, Mark, John Scholz, Mark Lubell, Denisa Mindruta, and Matthew Edwardsen. 2003. “ Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program.” American Journal of Political Science 47 ( 1 ): 143 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegura, Gary M., and Luis P. Fraga. 2008. “ Race and the Recall: Racial and Ethnic Polarization in the California Recall Election.” American Journal of Political Science 52 ( 2 ): 421 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnijders, Tom A. B., Christian E. G. Steglich, Michael Schweinberger, and Mark Huisman. 2007. “ Manual for SIENA Version 3.2.” Groningen: University of Groningen, ICS. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics. http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/stocnet.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeodoro, Manuel P. 2011. Bureaucratic Ambition: Careers, Motives, and the Innovative Administrator. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTolbert, Caroline J., and Rodney E. Hero. 1996. “ Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of California's Illegal Immigration Initiative.” Journal of Politics 58 ( 3 ): 806 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVictor, Jennifer Nicholl, and Nils Ringe. 2009. “ The Social Utility of Informal Institutions: Caucuses as Networks in the 110 th United States House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 37 ( 5 ): 742 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatts, Duncan J. 1999. “ Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon.” American Journal of Sociology 105 ( 2 ): 493 – 527.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisstein, Eric W. 2012. “ Geometric Centroid.” From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GeometricCentroid.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTiebout, Charles. 1956. “ A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 ( 5 ): 416 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlesina, Alberto F., and Eliana La Ferrara. 2005. “ Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.” Journal of Public Economics 89: 897 – 931.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlesina, Alberto F., and Paola Giuliano. 2009. “ Preferences for Redistribution.” NBER Working Paper # 14825.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardach, Eugene. 1998. Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarreto, Matt A., and Ricardo Ramirez. 2004. “ Minority Participation and the California Recall: Latino, Black and Asian Voting Trends, 1990–2003.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 ( 1 ): 11 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenjamin, Gerald, and Richard P. Nathan. 2001. Regionalism and Realism: A Study of Governments in the New York Metropolitan Area. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerardo, Ramiro, and John T. Scholz. 2010. “ Self‐Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection and Cooperation in Estuaries.” American Journal of Political Science 54 ( 3 ): 632 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBishop, Bill. 2008. The Big Sort. New York: Houghton Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaldeira, Gregory A., and Samuel C. Patterson. 1987. “ Political Friendship in the Legislature.” Journal of Politics 49 ( 4 ): 953 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCassar, A. 2007. “ Coordination and Cooperation in Local, Random and Small World Networks: Experimental Evidence.” Games and Economic Behavior 58 ( 2 ): 209 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClingermayer, James C., and Richard C. Feiock. 2001. Institutional Constraints and Policy Choice: An Exploration of Local Governance. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalcone, Michael, and Michael Moss. 2008. “ Group's Tally of New Voters Was Vastly Overstated.” New York Times, October 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C. 2007. “ Rational Choice and Regional Governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 ( 1 ): 47 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C. 2009. “ Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action.” Urban Affairs Review 44 ( 3 ): 356 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C., and Jaehoon Kim. 2000. “ Form of Government, Administrative Organization, and Local Economic Development Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 ( 1 ): 29 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischel, William. 1985. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischel, William. 2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land‐Use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler, James H. 2006. “ Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis 14 ( 4 ): 456 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedmann, John, and Clyde Weaver. 1980. Territory and Function: The Evolution of Regional Planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallup Poll. 2010. “ Economy Top Issue for Voters; Size of Gov't May Be More PivotaL.” http://www.gallup.com/poll/144029/economy‐top‐issue‐voters‐size‐gov‐may‐pivotal.aspx.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber, Elisabeth R., and Clark C. Gibson. 2009. “ Balancing Regionalism and Localism: How Institutions and Incentives Shape American Transportation Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 53 ( 3 ): 633 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrossman, Matt, and Casey B. K. Dominguez. 2009. “ Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks.” American Politics Research 37 ( 5 ): 767 – 800.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaas, Peter. 1992. “ Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 ( 1 ): 1 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, Christopher. 2008. “ Obama's Voter‐Registration Drive.” The Nation, September 1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeaney, Michael T., and Fabio Rojas. 2009. “ The Partisan Dynamics of Contention: Demobilization of the Antiwar Movement in the United States, 2007–2009.” Working paper, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeaney, Michael T., Seth E. Masket, Joanne M. Miller, and Dara Z. Strolovitch. 2009. “ Healing the Rift? Social Networks and Reconciliation between Obama and Clinton Delegates in 2008.” Working paper, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenry, Adam Douglas, Mark Lubell, and Michael McCoy. 2011. “ Belief Systems and Social Capital as Drivers of Policy Network Structure: The Case of California Regional Planning.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 ( 3 ): 419 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz, Bruce, ed. 2000. Reflections on Regionalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKossinets, Gueorgi, and Duncan J. Watts. 2009. “ Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network.” American Journal of Sociology 115 ( 2 ): 405 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwon, Sung‐Wook, and Richard Feiock. 2008. “ Regional Organizations and Coordination of Land Use Regulation Among Florida Cities.” Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association meetings, New Orleans, LA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, John M. 2009. Contemporary Urban Planning. 9 th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubell, Mark, Richard C. Feiock, and Edgar Ramirez. 2005. “ Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments.” Urban Affairs Review 40 ( 6 ): 706 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubell, Mark, Richard C. Feiock, and E. E. R. de la Cruz. 2009. “ Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth.” American Journal of Political Science 53 ( 3 ): 649 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaser, Steven M. 1998. “ Constitutions as Relational Contracts: Explaining Procedural Safeguards in Municipal Charters.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8: 527 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith‐Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. “ Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, Sarah. 2008. “ New Voters Like Obama, but May Not Show Up at Polls.” Wall Street Journal, October 1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Association of Realtors. 2011. “ The 2011 Community Preference Survey: What Americans Are Looking for When Deciding Where to Live.” http://www.realtor.org/government_affairs/smart_growth/survey.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.