Show simple item record

Role of life cycle assessment in sustainable aquaculture

dc.contributor.authorCao, Lingen_US
dc.contributor.authorDiana, James S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKeoleian, Gregory A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-08T17:45:24Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T19:11:39Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationCao, Ling; Diana, James S.; Keoleian, Gregory A. (2013). "Role of life cycle assessment in sustainable aquaculture." Reviews in Aquaculture 5(2): 61-71. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98772>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1753-5123en_US
dc.identifier.issn1753-5131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98772
dc.description.abstractAs an alternative food source to wild fisheries, aquaculture shows a great potential to help meet the growing demand for seafood and animal protein. The expansion of aquaculture has been achieved partly by system intensification, which has drawn vast criticisms of aquaculture for its environmental, social and economic sustainability issues. Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become the leading tool for identifying key environmental impacts of seafood production systems. A LCA evaluates the sustainability of diverse aquaculture systems quantitatively from a cradle‐to‐grave perspective. It provides a scientific basis for analysing system improvement and the development of certification and eco‐labelling criteria. Current efforts focus on integrating local ecological and socio‐economic impacts into the LCA framework. A LCA can play an important role in informing decision makers in order to achieve more sustainable seafood production and consumption. This article reviews recent applications of LCA in aquaculture, compares the environmental performance of different aquaculture production systems, explores the potential of including biodiversity issues into LCA analysis and examines the potential of LCA in setting criteria for certification and eco‐labelling.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental Impacten_US
dc.subject.otherLife Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.subject.otherSustainabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherBiodiversityen_US
dc.subject.otherCertificationen_US
dc.subject.otherAquacultureen_US
dc.titleRole of life cycle assessment in sustainable aquacultureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAtmospheric and Oceanic Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98772/1/raq1080.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01080.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceReviews in Aquacultureen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenced’Orbcastel ER, Blancheton JP, Aubin J ( 2009 ) Towards environmentally sustainable aquaculture: comparison between two trout farming systems using life cycle assessment. Aquacultural Engineering 40: 113 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceISO ( 1998 ) Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis. International Organization for Standardization 14041, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.iso.org.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceISO ( 2000 ) Environmental Labels and Declarations – General Principles. International Organization for Standardization 14020, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.iso.org.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeanneret P ( 2008 ) A new LCIA method for assessing impacts of agricultural activities on biodiversity. In: Nemecek T, Gaillard G (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri‐Food Sector – Towards a Sustainable Management of the Food Chain, pp. 34 – 39; 12–14 Nov 2008, Zurich, Switzerland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruse SA, Flysjö A, Kasperczyk N, Scholz AJ ( 2009 ) Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment – an application to salmon production systems. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14: 8 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMA ( 2005 ) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index. Accessed on 2 August 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMente E, Karalazos V, Karapanagiotidis IT, Pita C ( 2011 ) Nutrition in organic aquaculture: an inquiry and a discourse. Aquaculture Nutrition 17: 798 – 817.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMungkong R, Gheewala SH ( 2007 ) Use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impacts of aquaculture and agri‐food products. In: Bartley DM, Brugère C, Soto D, Gerber P, Harvey B (eds) Comparative Assessment of the Environmental Costs of Aquaculture and Other Food Production Sectors: Methods for Meaningful Comparisons. FAO Fisheries Proceedings. No. 10, pp. 87 – 96, FAO, Rome.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMungkung RT ( 2005 ) Shrimp aquaculture in Thailand: application of life cycle assessment to support sustainable development. PhD thesis. Center for Environmental Strategy, School of Engineering, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMungkung RT, Udo De Haes HA, Clift R ( 2006 ) Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting ecolabelling criteria: a case study of Thai shrimp aquaculture product. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11: 55 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwens J ( 1996 ) LCA impact assessment categories. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1: 151 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila UR, Walters CJ et al. ( 2002 ) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418: 689 – 695.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelletier N, Tyedmers P ( 2007 ) Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture 272: 399 – 416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelletier N, Tyedmers P ( 2008 ) Life cycle considerations for improving sustainability assessments in seafood awareness campaigns. Environmental Management 42: 918 – 931.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelletier N, Tyedmers P ( 2010 ) Life cycle assessment of frozen tilapia fillets from Indonesian lake‐based and pond‐based intensive aquaculture systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14: 467 – 481.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelletier NL, Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH, Kruse SA, Flysjo A, Robillard G et al. ( 2007 ) Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: review and prospectus. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12: 414 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelletier N, Tyedmers P, Sonesson U, Scholz A, Ziegler F, Flysjo A et al. ( 2009 ) Not all salmon are created equal: life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. Environmental Science and Technology 43: 8730 – 8736.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePRé ( 2008 ) SimaPro 7.1. http://www.pre.nl/.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N et al. ( 2009 ) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of Food Engineering 90: 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt JH ( 2008 ) Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity. Journal of Cleaner Production 16: 1929 – 1942.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSun WT ( 2009 ) Life cycle assessment of indoor recirculating shrimp aquaculture system. Master’s thesis. School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThrane ( 2004 ) Environmental impacts from Danish fish products – hot spots and environmental policies. PhD Dissertation. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNEP/SETAC ( 2009 ) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, UNEP. http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA‐guidelines_sLCA.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Vries M, de Boer IJM ( 2010 ) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128: 1 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL ( 2006 ) Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report Defra Research Project ISO205. Cranfield University and Defra, Bedford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiegler F, Nilsson P, Mattsson B, Walther Y ( 2003 ) Life cycle assessment of frozen cod fillets including fishery‐specific environmental impacts. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8: 39 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlkemade R, Van Oorschot M, Miles L, Nellemann C, Bakkenes M, Ten Brink B ( 2009 ) GLOBIO3: a framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 12: 374 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAubin J, Papatryphon E, van der Werf HMG, Chatzifotis S ( 2009 ) Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 354 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAyer NW, Tyedmers PH ( 2009 ) Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 362 – 373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartley DM, Brugère C, Soto D, Gerber P, Harvey B (eds) ( 2007 ) Comparative assessment of the environmental costs of aquaculture and other food production sectors: methods for meaningful comparisons. FAO/WFT Expert Workshop, 24–28 April 2006, Vancouver, Canada. FAO Fisheries Proceedings. No. 10. FAO, Rome.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaruthio A, Aubin J, Mungkung R, Lazard J, Van der Werf HM ( 2009 ) Environmental assessment of Filipino fish/prawn polyculture using life cycle assessment. In: Nemecek T, Gaillard G (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri‐Food Sector – Towards a Sustainable Management of the Food Chain. Agroscope Reckenholz‐Tänikon Research Station ART, Zurich, Switzerland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBosma R, Hanh CTT, Potting J, Dung PTA ( 2009 ) Environmental Impact Assessment of the Pangasius Sector in the Mekong Delta. Wageningen University, Wageningen.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBosma R, Anh P, Potting J ( 2011 ) Life cycle assessment of intensive striped catfish farming in the Mekong Delta for screening hotspots as input to environmental policy and research agenda. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16: 903 – 915.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBostock J, McAndrew B, Richards R, Jauncey K, Telfer T, Lorenzen K et al. ( 2010 ) Aquaculture: global status and trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 2897 – 2912.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan den Burg SWK, Taal C, de Boer IJM, Bakker T, Viets TC ( 2011 ) Environmental Performance of Wild‐Caught North Sea Whitefish: A Comparison with Aquaculture and Animal Husbandry Using LCA. http://www.lei.dlo.nl/publicaties/PDF/2011/2011‐090.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCao L, Diana JS, Keoleian GA, Lai Q ( 2011 ) Life cycle assessment of Chinese shrimp farming systems targeted for export and domestic sales. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 6531 – 6538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurran M, De Baan L, De Schryver AM, Van Zelm R, Hellweg S, Koellner T et al. ( 2011 ) Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 70 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeng NS, Wang XB ( 2003 ) Life Cycle Assessment. Chemical Industry Press, China.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiana JS ( 2009 ) Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience 59: 27 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllingsen H, Aanondsen SA ( 2006 ) Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon – a comparison with chicken. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11: 60 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllingsen H, Olaussen JO, Utne IB ( 2009 ) Environmental analysis of the Norwegian fishery and aquaculture industry – a preliminary study focusing on farmed salmon. Marine Policy 33: 479 – 488.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEU ( 2007 ) Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products and Repealing Regulation. Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFAO ( 2010 ) Fishstat Fishery Statistical Collections: Aquaculture Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstat/en. Accessed on 1 August 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrönroos J, Seppälä J, Silvenius F, Mäkinen T ( 2006 ) Life cycle assessment of Finnish cultivated rainbow trout. Boreal Environment Research 11: 401 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeller MC, Keoleian GA ( 2003 ) Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: a life cycle perspective. Agricultural Systems 76: 1007 – 1041.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeller MC, Keoleian GA ( 2011 ) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of a large‐scale vertically integrated organic dairy in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 1903 – 1910.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenriksson P, Guinée J, Kleijn R, de Snoo G ( 2012 ) Life cycle assessment of aquaculture systems – a review of methodologies. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17: 304 – 313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHospido A, Tyedmers P ( 2005 ) Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries. Fisheries Research 76: 174 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G ( 2010 ) Revisiting the life cycle assessment of mussels from a sectorial perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 101 – 111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceISO ( 1997 ) Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. International Organization for Standardization 14040, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.iso.org.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.