Show simple item record

Effect of erlotinib on epidermal growth factor receptor and downstream signaling in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

dc.contributor.authorTsien, Christina I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNyati, Mukesh K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhsan, Aarifen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamanand, Susmita G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChepeha, Douglas B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWorden, Francis P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHelman, Joseph I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorD'Silva, Nishaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBradford, Carol R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Gregory T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Theodore S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEisbruch, Avrahamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-04T17:18:19Z
dc.date.available2014-10-06T19:17:41Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationTsien, Christina I.; Nyati, Mukesh K.; Ahsan, Aarif; Ramanand, Susmita G.; Chepeha, Douglas B.; Worden, Francis P.; Helman, Joseph I.; D'Silva, Nisha; Bradford, Carol R.; Wolf, Gregory T.; Lawrence, Theodore S.; Eisbruch, Avraham (2013). "Effect of erlotinib on epidermal growth factor receptor and downstream signaling in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma ." Head & Neck 35(9): 1323-1330. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/99603>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1043-3074en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/99603
dc.description.abstractBackground The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in biomarker modulation and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) degradation between the tumor and the normal mucosa after treatment with an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, in head and neck cancer. Methods Patients with primary oral cavity squamous cell cancers received a course of erlotinib, 150 mg every day for 7 days before surgical resection. Tumor and normal mucosa biopsies were obtained both pre‐erlotinib and post‐erlotinib. Changes in known markers of EGFR activity (phospho, AKT, STAT3) were measured by immunoblotting, whereas changes in tissue distribution were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis. Results Twelve patients were enrolled; 7 had evaluable paired tumors and normal mucosa biopsies pretreatment and posttreatment. Expression of EGFR was higher in tumors compared to the normal mucosa ( p = .005). Erlotinib administration was associated with marked inhibition of phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (pEGFR) and reduction in total EGFR protein ( p = .004, p = .007) in tumors, whereas there was heterogeneity in EGFR inhibition in the normal mucosa ( p = .10 [pEGFR], and p = .07 [EGFR]). Reduced levels of pSrc and pSTAT3 and enhanced p27 levels were noted in tumors after erlotinib. Cell culture studies confirmed that EGFR is degraded in tumor cells after prolonged treatment with erlotinib. Conclusion Our results show that EGFR inhibition by erlotinib led to a marked reduction in EGFR protein levels in patients. Differential effects of erlotinib on tumors compared to the normal mucosa suggest there may be individual patient heterogeneity. These preliminary data suggest EGFR degradation should be further analyzed as a potential biomarker in selecting patients likely to benefit from EGFR inhibitors. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2013en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherDegradationen_US
dc.subject.otherNormal Mucosaen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomarkeren_US
dc.subject.otherErlotiniben_US
dc.subject.otherPrimary Oral Cavity Canceren_US
dc.titleEffect of erlotinib on epidermal growth factor receptor and downstream signaling in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInternal Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Oral Medicine/Pathology and Oncology, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22907806en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/99603/1/23128_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hed.23128en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHead & Necken_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhsan A, Hiniker SM, Davis MA, Lawrence TS, Nyati MK. Role of cell cycle in epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor‐mediated radiosensitization. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 5108 – 5114.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCiardiello F, Tortora G. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a target in cancer therapy: understanding the role of receptor expression and other molecular determinants that could influence the response to anti‐EGFR drugs. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 1348 – 1354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScartozzi M, Bearzi I, Berardi R, Mandolesi A, Fabris G, Cascinu S. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in primary colorectal tumors does not correlate with EGFR expression in related metastatic sites: implications for treatment with EGFR‐targeted monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4772 – 4778.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParra HS, Cavina R, Latteri F, et al. Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor expression as a predictive factor for response to gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839) in non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 208 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrugger W, Triller N, Blasinska–Morawiec M, et al. Prospective molecular marker analyses of EGFR and KRAS from a randomized, placebo‐controlled study of erlotinib maintenance therapy in advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4113 – 4120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 339 – 346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 643 – 655.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004; 304: 1497 – 1500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzabó B, Nelhubel GA, Kárpáti A, et al. Clinical significance of genetic alterations and expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol 2011; 47: 487 – 496.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheikh Ali MA, Gunduz M, Nagatsuka H, et al. Expression and mutation analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 1589 – 1594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee JW, Soung YH, Kim SY, et al. Somatic mutations of EGFR gene in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 2879 – 2882.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemos–González Y, Páez de la Cadena MP, Rodríguez–Berrocal FJ, Rodríguez–Piñeiro AM, Pallas E, Valverde D. Absence of activating mutations in the EGFR kinase domain in Spanish head and neck cancer patients. Tumour Biol 2007; 28: 273 – 279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung CH, Ely K, McGavran L, et al. Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4170 – 4176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSok JC, Coppelli FM, Thomas SM, et al. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) contributes to head and neck cancer growth and resistance to EGFR targeting. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 5064 – 5073.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open‐label, first‐line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2866 – 2874.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng FY, Lopez CA, Normolle DP, et al. Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor class in the treatment of head and neck cancer with concurrent radiochemotherapy in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 2512 – 2518.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNyati MK, Lawrence TS. Hitting the target: measuring EGFR response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Biol Ther 2005; 4: 1387 – 1388.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNyati MK, Maheshwari D, Hanasoge S, et al. Radiosensitization by pan ErbB inhibitor CI‐1033 in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 691 – 700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRay D, Ahsan A, Helman A, et al. Regulation of EGFR protein stability by the HECT‐type ubiquitin ligase SMURF2. Neoplasia 2011; 13: 570 – 578.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArgiris A, Duffy AG, Kummar S, et al. Early tumor progression associated with enhanced EGFR signaling with bortezomib, cetuximab, and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 5755 – 5764.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhsan A, Hiniker SM, Ramanand SG, et al. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor degradation in cisplatin‐induced cytotoxicity in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 2862 – 2869.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng FY, Varambally S, Tomlins SA, et al. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor degradation in gemcitabine‐mediated cytotoxicity. Oncogene 2007; 26: 3431 – 3439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeihua Z, Tsan R, Huang WC, et al. Survival of cancer cells is maintained by EGFR independent of its kinase activity. Cancer Cell 2008; 13: 385 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal DI, Lewin JS, Eisbruch A. Prevention and treatment of dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2636 – 2643.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEisbruch A, Lyden T, Bradford CR, et al. Objective assessment of swallowing dysfunction and aspiration after radiation concurrent with chemotherapy for head‐and‐neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 23 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNyati MK, Feng FY, Maheshwari D, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated down‐regulates phospho‐extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2 via activation of MKP‐1 in response to radiation. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 11554 – 11559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToyoshima H, Hunter T. p27, a novel inhibitor of G1 cyclin‐Cdk protein‐kinase activity, is related to p21. Cell 1994; 78: 67 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5‐year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab‐induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 21 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high‐risk squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1937 – 1944.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDittmann K, Mayer C, Rodemann HP. Inhibition of radiation‐induced EGFR nuclear import by C225 (cetuximab) suppresses DNA‐PK activity. Radiother Oncol 2005; 76: 157 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAng KK, Zhang QE, Rosenthal DI. A randomized phase III trial (RTOG 0522) of concurrent accelerated radiation plus cisplatin with or without cetuximab for stage III–IV head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNC). J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 ( Suppl ):Abstract 5500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler DL, Huang S, Kruser TJ, et al. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family members. Oncogene 2008; 27: 3944 – 3956.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas F, Rochaix P, Benlyazid A, et al. Pilot study of neoadjuvant treatment with erlotinib in nonmetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 7086 – 7092.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgulnik M, da Cunha Santos G, Hedley D, et al. Predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarker studies in tumor and skin tissue samples of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2184 – 2190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentzen SM, Atasoy BM, Daley FM, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in pretreatment biopsies from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as a predictive factor for a benefit from accelerated radiation therapy in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5560 – 5567.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgulnik M, da Cunha Santos G, Hedley D, et al. Predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarker studies in tumor and skin tissue samples of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2184 – 2190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Waes C, Allen CT, Citrin D, et al. Molecular and clinical responses in a pilot study of gefitinib with paclitaxel and radiation in locally advanced head‐and‐neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77: 447 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2011; 11: 9 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerez–Ordoñez B, Beauchemin M, Jordan RC. Molecular biology of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 445 – 453.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO‐charoenrat P, Rhys–Evans PH, Modjtahedi H, Eccles SA. The role of c‐erbB receptors and ligands in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2002; 38: 627 – 640.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhademi B, Shirazi FM, Vasei M, et al. The expression of p53, c‐erbB‐1 and c‐erbB‐2 molecules and their correlation with prognostic markers in patients with head and neck tumors. Cancer Lett 2002; 184: 223 – 230.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.