Development of behavioral preferences for the optimal choice following unexpected reward omission is mediated by a reduction of D 2‐like receptor tone in the nucleus accumbens

Abstract

To survive in a dynamic environment, animals must identify changes in resource availability and rapidly apply adaptive strategies to obtain resources that promote survival. We have utilised a behavioral paradigm to assess differences in foraging strategy when resource (reward) availability unexpectedly changes. When reward magnitude was reduced by 50% (receive one reward pellet instead of two), male and female rats developed a preference for the optimal choice by the second session. However, when an expected reward was omitted (receive no reward pellets instead of one), subjects displayed a robust preference for the optimal choice during the very first session. Previous research shows that, when an expected reward is omitted, dopamine neurons phasically decrease their firing rate, which is hypothesised to decrease dopamine release preferentially affecting D 2‐like receptors. As robust changes in behavioral preference were specific to reward omission, we tested this hypothesis and the functional role of D 1‐ and D 2‐like receptors in the nucleus accumbens in mediating the rapid development of a behavioral preference for the rewarded option during reward omission in male rats. Blockade of both receptor types had no effect on this behavior; however, holding D 2‐like, but not D 1‐like, receptor tone via infusion of dopamine receptor agonists prevented the development of the preference for the rewarded option during reward omission. These results demonstrate that avoiding an outcome that has been tagged with aversive motivational properties is facilitated through decreased dopamine transmission and subsequent functional disruption of D 2‐like, but not D 1‐like, receptor tone in the nucleus accumbens. This study investigates the role of dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens in altering behavior in response to the omission of an expected reward. Similarly to controls, multiple doses of a D 1‐like receptor agonist, D 1‐like receptor antagonist, and D 2‐like receptor antagonist do not prevent subjects from developing a robust behavioral preference for the rewarded lever and avoiding the omitted‐reward lever during the first session of reward omission. However, the D 2‐like agonist quinpirole dose‐dependently blocks a behavioral preference for the rewarded lever, suggesting that reductions in D 2‐like receptor tone are necessary for altering behavior away from an aversive option and toward the optimal choice.