Deadlines, Work Flows, Task Sorting, and Work Quality
dc.contributor.author | Sivadasan, Jagadeesh | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jeongsik | |
dc.contributor | Balasubramanian, Natarajan | |
dc.contributor | Lee, Jeongsik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-16T18:06:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-09-16T18:06:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-08 | |
dc.identifier | 1199 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/99757 | |
dc.description.abstract | We examine deadlines-induced behavior using large-scale, high frequency data on about 5 million U.S. patents and published applications. We motivate the study with a model of rational agents facing discontinuous incentives around deadline thresholds, without using time-inconsistent preferences invoked in behavioral economics models of deadline-related behavior. Consistent with our model predictions, we find notable clustering of more complex patent applications around potential deadlines at month-, quarter- and year-ends, along with a small to moderate decline in work quality around those periods. | en_US |
dc.subject | incentives | en_US |
dc.subject | routines | en_US |
dc.subject | productivity | en_US |
dc.subject | time-inconsistent | en_US |
dc.subject | preferences | en_US |
dc.subject | innovation | en_US |
dc.subject | patents | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Business Economics | en_US |
dc.title | Deadlines, Work Flows, Task Sorting, and Work Quality | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Syracuse University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Georgia Institute of Technology | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/99757/1/1199_Sivadasan.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.