Show simple item record

"Would I Feel More Secure With a Robot?": Understanding Perceptions of Security Robots in Public Spaces

dc.contributor.authorMarcu, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorLin, Iris
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Lionel + "Jr"
dc.contributor.authorSchaub, Florian
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T00:50:05Z
dc.date.available2023-05-09T00:50:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-08
dc.identifier.citationMarcu, G., Lin, I., Williams, B., Robert, L. P. and Schaub, F. (2023). "Would I Feel More Secure With a Robot?": Understanding Perceptions of Security Robots in Public Spaces, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7, CSCW, Article 322, (October 2023).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176362en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1145/3610171
dc.description.abstractRobots are increasingly being deployed as security agents helping law enforcement in spaces such as streets, parks, or shopping malls. Unfortunately, the deployment of security robots is not without problems and controversies. For example, the New York Police Department canceled its contract with Boston Dynamics in response to backlash from their use of Digidog, an autonomous robotic dog, which sparked fears in the public. However, it is unclear to what extent affected communities have been involved in the design and deployment process of robots. This is problematic because, without input from community members in the processes of design and deployment, security robots are likely to not satisfy the concerns or safety needs of real communities. To gain deeper insight into people’s perceptions of security robots—including both potential benefits and concerns—we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews addressing the following research questions: RQ1. What characteristics do people ascribe to security robots? RQ2. What expectations do people have about the function and role of security robots? RQ3. What are people’s attitudes toward the use of security robots? Our study offers several contributions to the existing literature on security robots.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,en_US
dc.subjectRoboten_US
dc.subjectsecurity robotsen_US
dc.subjectlaw enforcementen_US
dc.subjectDigidogen_US
dc.subjectautonomous robotic dogen_US
dc.subjectpolicingen_US
dc.subjectrobot policingen_US
dc.subjectpublic safetyen_US
dc.subjecthuman-robot interactionen_US
dc.subjectK5 Outdoor Autonomous Security Roboten_US
dc.subjectNew York Police Department Robotsen_US
dc.subjectSurveillance security robotsen_US
dc.subjectSecurity Robot Acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Inequityen_US
dc.subjectpolice robotsen_US
dc.subjectSecurity Robot and Surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectRoboCopsen_US
dc.subjectracial bias in policingen_US
dc.subjectpolicing racial biasen_US
dc.title"Would I Feel More Secure With a Robot?": Understanding Perceptions of Security Robots in Public Spacesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInformation, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRobotics Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176362/1/Marcu et al. 2023 (Preprint).pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176362/3/Marcu et al. 2023 Final (CSCW 2023).pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/7211
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3610171
dc.identifier.sourceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interactionen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1410-2601en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Marcu et al. 2023 (Preprint).pdf : Preprint
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidRobert, Lionel P.; 0000-0002-1410-2601en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/7211en_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.