Show simple item record

Autonomy Acceptance Model (AAM): The Role of Autonomy and Risk in Security Robot Acceptance

dc.contributor.authorYe, Xin
dc.contributor.authorJo, Wonse
dc.contributor.authorAli, Arsha
dc.contributor.authorBhatti, Samia
dc.contributor.authorEsterwood, Connor
dc.contributor.authorKassie, Hana
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Lionel + "Jr"
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T17:03:24Z
dc.date.available2024-01-03T17:03:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-03
dc.identifier.citationXin Ye, Wonse Jo, Arsha Ali, Samia Cornelius Bhatti, Connor Esterwood, Hana Andargie Kassie, and Lionel Peter Robert. 2024. Autonomy Acceptance Model (AAM): The Role of Autonomy and Risk in Security Robot Acceptance In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI ’24), March 11–14, 2024, Boulder, CO, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610977.3635005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1145/3610977.3635005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/191763en
dc.description.abstractThe rapid deployment of security robots across our society calls for further examination of their acceptance. This study explored human acceptance of security robots by theoretically extending the technology acceptance model to include the impact of autonomy and risk. To accomplish this, an online experiment involving 236 participants was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to watch a video introducing a security robot operating at an autonomy level of low, moderate, or high, and presenting either a low or high risk to humans. This resulted in a 3 (autonomy) × 2 (risk) between-subjects design. The findings suggest that increased perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and trust enhance acceptance, while higher robot autonomy tends to decrease acceptance. Additionally, the physical risk associated with security robots moderates the relationship between autonomy and acceptance. Based on these results, this paper offers recommendations for future research on security robots.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHRI 2024en_US
dc.subjectHuman-robot interactionen_US
dc.subjectRoboten_US
dc.subjectSecurity robotsen_US
dc.subjectAutonomyen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectHuman-robot acceptanceen_US
dc.subjecttechnology acceptance modelen_US
dc.subjectrobot technology acceptance modelen_US
dc.subjectAutonomy Acceptance Modelen_US
dc.subjectrobot autonomyen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robots acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robot acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robot acceptance modelen_US
dc.subjectautonomous systemsen_US
dc.subjectautonomy of security robotsen_US
dc.subjectautonomous roboten_US
dc.subjectsecurity robots’ autonomyen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robot ease of useen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robot usefulnessen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robot trusten_US
dc.subjectperceived risk of security robotsen_US
dc.subjectsecurity robot risken_US
dc.subjectsecurity roboten_US
dc.subjectrobot copen_US
dc.subjectrobocopen_US
dc.subjectpolice roboten_US
dc.subjectrobot policeen_US
dc.subjectrobot guarden_US
dc.subjectknightscope security roboten_US
dc.subjectpepper roboten_US
dc.titleAutonomy Acceptance Model (AAM): The Role of Autonomy and Risk in Security Robot Acceptanceen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInformation, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRobotics Departmenten_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191763/1/Ye et al. Hri 2024.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3610977.3635005
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/21941
dc.identifier.sourceProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI ’24)en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1410-2601en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Ye et al. Hri 2024.pdf : Published Version
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidRobert, Lionel P.; 0000-0002-1410-2601en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/21941en_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.