Public evaluations of the presidential nomination process
dc.contributor.author | Petrella, Margaret | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Traugott, Michael W. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T16:06:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T16:06:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1989-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Traugott, Michael W.; Petrella, Margaret; (1989). "Public evaluations of the presidential nomination process." Political Behavior 11(4): 335-352. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45483> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0190-9320 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-6687 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45483 | |
dc.description.abstract | The evaluation of presidential nomination reforms has been the topic of elite discussion and debate, with little attention paid to popular evaluations. Public attitudes toward a number of reforms to the presidential nomination process were evaluated through survey data collected in 1988. The evaluations included campaign costs, debates, the influence of consultants, and the role of the media. The analysis suggests that there is a relatively high level of popular satisfaction with these dimensions of the current system. Popular concern about the nomination process is focused in two areas—the roles of money and the media. There is a strong suggestion that the movement toward regionalization of the calendar was responsive to partisan concerns in different regions of the country. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1196232 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Social Sciences, General | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Political Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Political Science | en_US |
dc.title | Public evaluations of the presidential nomination process | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Center for Political Studies, The University of Michigan, 48106-1248, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The Gallup Organization, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45483/1/11109_2005_Article_BF01002141.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01002141 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Political Behavior | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.