JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Spatial Synthesis: The Evidence of Cartographic Example: Hierarchy and Centrality
Arlinghaus, Sandra Lach; Arlinghaus, S. L.
2005-06-21
Citation:Arlinghaus, Sandra L. "Spatial Synthesis: The Evidence of Cartographic Example: Hierarchy and Centrality." Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics, Volume XVI, Number 1. Ann Arbor: Institute of Mathematical Geography, 2005. Persistent URL (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58322
Abstract: The cartographic example presented below displays principles of spatial synthesis as they focus on centrality and hierarchy.
* Classical example: The dot density map employs a nested hierarchy of regions to convert information about dots to information about regions; in so-doing, the clusters of dots emerge as centers of activity associated with the nature of the underlying data from which the dots were extracted.
* Contemporary example: The interactive online map may employ a nested hierarchy that, in a single map, offers not only information of the sort available in a dot density map but also a host of other previously impossible features, as well. It may be linked to the underlying database in a manner that also permits
o scale transformation
o views of the database corresponding to small regions on the map
o searches of the underlying database.
Interactive capability can be far more than an interesting visualization tool; it can be one offering synthesis of spatial information at a level far greater than that available with any classical map.