View Item 

Show simple item record

Firing the Unproductive Employee: Will Civil Service Reform Make a Difference?

dc.contributor.authorBan, Carolynen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldenberg, Edie N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarzotto, Tonien_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:50:32Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:50:32Z
dc.date.issued1982en_US
dc.identifier.citationBan, Carolyn; Goldenberg, Edie; Marzotto, Toni (1982). "Firing the Unproductive Employee: Will Civil Service Reform Make a Difference?." Review of Public Personnel Administration 2(2): 87-100. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68633>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0734-371Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68633
dc.description.abstractCivil service reform included a set of changes intended to facilitate the firing of consistently un productive employees. This article describes the background and logic of these changes, reviews the status of their implementation, and offers preliminary evidence on their consequences for per sonnel management in the federal government.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1048207 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleFiring the Unproductive Employee: Will Civil Service Reform Make a Difference?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherU. S. Office of Personnel Managementen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherTowson State Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68633/2/10.1177_0734371X8200200208.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0734371X8200200208en_US
dc.identifier.sourceReview of Public Personnel Administrationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, A.K. (1977). "Breaking the Bureaucratic Bond." Remarks before the Third Annual Institute for Kansas Legislators, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas (December).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, A.K. (1978). "The Battle Over Bureaucracy." Time magazine (March).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas v. VA (1981). Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket Number AT075299006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeneral Accounting Office (1978). A Management Concern: How to Deal with the Nonproductive Federal Employee. FPCD-78-71. (August).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Auliffe v. New Bedford (1892). 155 Mass. 216, 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerit Systems Protection Board (1981). Stud of MSPB Appeals Decisions for FY 1980. Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies (May).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerritt v. Justice (1981). Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket Number PH075209058.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker v. Defense Logistics Agency (1980). Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket Number PH053149001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReorganization Plan No. 2 (1978). Law 95-454 (October 13).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenbloom, D.H. (1977). Federal Service and the Constitution. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU. S. Office of Personnel Management (1980). Federal Employee Attitudes: Phase 1, Baseline Survey (March).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference__ (forthcoming). Federal Employee Attitudes: Phase 2: Follow-up Survey.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference__ (forthcoming). SES Special Study of Managerial Flexibility during a Change in Administration.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU. S. President's Personnel Management Project (1977). Vol. 1, Final Staff Report. Washington : Government Printing Office (December).en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_0734371X8200200208.pdf
Size:
1023.KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.