View Item 

Show simple item record

Safety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakers

dc.contributor.authorPulver, Aaron F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPuchalski, Michael D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBradley, David J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMinich, L. LuAnnen_US
dc.contributor.authorSu, Jason T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaarel, Elizabeth V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhitaker, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEtheridge, Susan P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:24:30Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:24:30Z
dc.date.issued2009-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationPULVER, AARON F.; PUCHALSKI, MICHAEL D.; BRADLEY, DAVID J.; MINICH, L. LUANN; SU, JASON T.; SAAREL, ELIZABETH V.; WHITAKER, PATRICIA; ETHERIDGE, SUSAN P. (2009). "Safety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakers." Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 32(4): 450-456. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75401>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-8389en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-8159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75401
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19335853&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent156020 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subject.otherPacemakeren_US
dc.subject.otherSafetyen_US
dc.subject.otherCongenital Heart Diseaseen_US
dc.subject.otherEpicardial Leadsen_US
dc.titleSafety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utahen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19335853en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75401/1/j.1540-8159.2009.02304.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02304.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, Masaryk TJ. Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: Evaluation of translational attraction using conventional (“long-bore”) and “short-bore” 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 5: 387 – 397.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: Biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004; 232: 635 – 652.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, Manning WJ, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007; 116: 2878 – 2891.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoguin A, Schwitter J, Vahlhaus C, Lombardi M, Brugada J, Vardas P, Auricchio A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace 2008; 10: 336 – 346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes DL, Holmes DR Jr, Gray JE. Effect of 1.5 Tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 782 – 786.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErlebacher JA, Cahill PT, Pannizzo F, Knowles RJ. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 437 – 440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 326 – 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1315 – 1324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, Weiss RG, et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation 2006; 114: 1277 – 1284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, Meyer C, et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: A prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation 2006; 114: 1285 – 1292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference11.  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FaDA, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health. Guidance for industry and FDA staff: Criteria for significant risk investigations of magnetic resonance diagnostic devices. In: Office of Device Evaluation ( ed ): Radiological Devices Branch DoR, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices. 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldsher D, Amikam S, Boulos M, Suleiman M, Shreiber R, Eran A, Goldshmid Y, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for patients with permanent pacemakers: Initial clinical experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2006; 8: 91 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGimbel JR, Bailey SM, Tchou PJ, Ruggieri PM, Wilkoff BL. Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 1041 – 1046.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoguin A, Zviman MM, Meininger GR, Rodrigues ER, Dickfeld TM, Bluemke DA, Lardo A, et al. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: In vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation 2004; 110: 475 – 482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShellock FG, O'Neil M, Ivans V, Kelly D, O'Connor M, Toay L, Crues JV. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators are unaffected by operation of an extremity MR imaging system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 165 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuechinger R, Zeijlemaker VA, Pedersen EM, Mortensen P, Falk E, Duru F, Candinas R, et al. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 376 – 383; discussion 25-7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForghani N, Cohen RA, Abbott MB. Radiation risks of CT scans. Pediatr Rev 2006; 27: 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCollough CH, Zhang J, Primak AN, Clement WJ, Buysman JR. Effects of CT irradiation on implantable cardiac rhythm management devices. Radiology 2007; 243: 766 – 774.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYamaji S, Imai S, Saito F, Yagi H, Kushiro T, Uchiyama T. Does high-power computed tomography scanning equipment affect the operation of pacemakers? Circ J 2006; 70: 190 – 197.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1540-8159.2009.02304.x.pdf
Size:
152.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.