Show simple item record

Understanding the Differences between Faculty and Administrator Goals and Students’ Experiences with Ethics Education

dc.contributor.authorHolsapple, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Donald D.
dc.contributor.authorSutkus, Janel
dc.contributor.authorFinelli, Cynthia J.
dc.contributor.authorWalczak, Kelley
dc.contributor.authorHarding, Trevor S.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-27T23:13:40Z
dc.date.available2011-04-27T23:13:40Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83695
dc.description.abstractThere is strong agreement about the need for effective ethics education in engineering academic programs, but students who graduate with a bachelor’s degree in engineering continue to be unprepared to face the ethical dilemmas of professional engineering. This study uses qualitative data collected at 18 diverse institutions and employs the Transmission Model of Communication to examine ethics education. We investigate the ways that communication channels and noise contribute to discrepancies in the goals and perceptions of faculty and staff and the experiences of students in regards to curricular ethics education. We present data that shows that faculty and administrators consider a balance between the knowledge of ethics, ethical reasoning, and ethical behavior to be important, while students report experiencing ethics education that focuses almost solely on knowledge. The paper uses this discrepancy as an illustration to demonstrate the way the model can be used to identify factors that contribute to these differing perceptions. Our work provides support for the use of the model for understanding ethics education. Implications for educators are presented.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectEngineering Educationen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectEthics Educationen_US
dc.subjectHigher Educationen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectTeaching and Learningen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the Differences between Faculty and Administrator Goals and Students’ Experiences with Ethics Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Research on Teaching and Learningen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCollege of Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Educationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Educationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCalifornia Polytechnic State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCarnegie Mellon Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLawrence Technological Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83695/1/2010_ASEE_Holsapple_et_al_Discrepancies.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Society for Engineering Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameResearch on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.