Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data
dc.contributor.author | Foster, Jared C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, Jeremy M. G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ruberg, Stephen J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-11-10T15:35:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-12-03T21:17:30Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2011-10-30 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Foster, Jared C.; Taylor, Jeremy M.G.; Ruberg, Stephen J. (2011). "Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data." Statistics in Medicine 30(24): 2867-2880. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87004> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-6715 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1097-0258 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87004 | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Randomized Clinical Trials | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Subgroups | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Random Forests | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Regression Trees | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Tailored Therapeutics | en_US |
dc.title | Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Statistics and Numeric Data | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21815180 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87004/1/sim4322.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/sim.4322 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Statistics in Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ruberg SJ, Chen L, Wang Y. The mean doesn't mean as much anymore: finding sub‐groups for tailored therapeutics. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: 574 – 583. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. The Lancet 2000; 355: 1064 – 1069. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Smith GD. Subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false‐positives and false‐negatives. Health Technology Assessment 2001; 5 ( 33 ): 1 – 56. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup‐specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004; 57: 229 – 236. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cui L, Hung HMJ, Wang SJ, Tsong Y. Issues related to subgroup analysis in clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2002; 12 ( 3 ): 347 – 358. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lagakos SW. The challenge of subgroup analyses—reporting without distorting. New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 354 ( 16 ): 1667 – 1669. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peto R, Collins R, Gray R. Large‐scale randomized evidence: large simple trials and overviews of trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995; 48: 23 – 40. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 2917 – 2930. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rothwell PM. Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials: importance, indications and interpretation. The Lancet 2005; 365: 176 – 186. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yusuf S, Wittes J, Probstfield J, Tyroler HA. Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. The Journal Of The American Medical Association 1991; 266 ( 1 ): 93 – 98. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine—reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357 ( 21 ): 2189 – 2194. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Feinstein AR. The problem of cogent subgroups: a clinicostatistical tragedy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998; 51 ( 4 ): 297 – 299. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kehl V, Ulm K. Responder identification in clinical trials with censored data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2006; 50 ( 5 ): 1338 – 1355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.015. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dixon DO, Simon R. Bayesian subset analysis. Biometrics 1991; 47: 871 – 881. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gail M, Simon R. Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 1985; 41: 361 – 372. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simon R. Bayesian subset analysis: application to studying treatment‐by‐gender interactions. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 2909 – 2916. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Negassa A, Ciampi A, Abrahamowicz M, Shapiro S, Boivin JR. Tree‐structured subgroup analysis for censored survival data: Validation of computationally inexpensive model selection criteria. Statistics and Computing 2005; 15: 231 – 239. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Su X, Tsai CL, Wang H, Nickerson DM, Bogong L. Subgroup analysis via recursive partitioning. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 2009; 10: 141 – 158. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Su X, Zhou T, Yan X, Fan J, Yang S. Interaction trees with censored survival data. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2008; 4 ( 1 ). Article 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Freidlin B, Jiang W, Simon R. The cross‐validated adaptive signature design. Clinical Cancer Research 2010; 16 ( 2 ): 691 – 698. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001; 45 ( 1 ): 5 – 32. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.