Work Description

Title: Dermatology Clerkship Chalk Talks Raw Dataset Open Access Deposited

h
Attribute Value
Methodology
  • A de-identified data set was collected from surveys administered to medical students during their dermatology clerkship before and after an educational teaching talk delivered via zoom. There were three chalk talks on three dermatologic topics in which data were collected: papulosquamous diseases, immunobollous diseases, and erythroderma. Questions were asked that gauged objective knowledge covered in each talk, confidence scores, efficacy scores, and qualitative feedback for each chalk talk.
Description
  • The data set includes one file: Dermatology Clerkship Chalk Talks Raw Dataset which is the raw data collected from the surveys. This raw data was then coded and scored with the following analysis. Objective knowledge questions were asked for each chalk talk which was scored by authors. A knowledge assessment score was calculated by adding the total number of points accumulated by the student, dividing it by the total number of points possible, and summarizing the score as a percentage. Pre- and post-talk knowledge assessment scores were compared for each chalk talk and for the entire curriculum using 2-tailed paired sample t-tests with statistical significance if p<0.05.

  • Before and after each talk, students were asked how confident they felt differentiating conditions within each disease group. For the erythroderma and immunobullous talks, students were also asked how confident they felt working up the conditions. Answer choices were on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (extremely confident). Pre- and post-chalk talk scores were summarized as means with standard deviations and compared using 2-tailed paired sample t-tests with statistical significance if p<0.05.

  • After each talk, students were asked about its efficacy in terms of enhancing their understanding of the diseases, providing a framework or approach to work-up, and facilitating interaction between student and teacher. Answer choices were on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all effective) to 5 (extremely effective), and summarized as means with standard deviations. Students were asked for written feedback regarding what they liked about the talk and suggestions for improvement. Qualitative data were sorted into categories and scored by two independent raters (cohen's kappa =0.8).

  • In the response Likert scale, "Not at all"=1, "Not so (much)"=2, "Somewhat"=3, "Very"=4, and "Extremely"=5.
Creator
Depositor
  • kelseygr@umich.edu
Contact information
Discipline
Keyword
Date coverage
  • 2021-01-01 to 2021-08-01
Resource type
Curation notes
  • On April 26, 2022, Specific values for Likert scale responses were added to record description.
Last modified
  • 11/20/2022
Published
  • 04/25/2022
Language
DOI
  • https://doi.org/10.7302/j1s4-jw48
License
To Cite this Work:
Gradwohl, K. M. (2022). Dermatology Clerkship Chalk Talks Raw Dataset [Data set], University of Michigan - Deep Blue Data. https://doi.org/10.7302/j1s4-jw48

Relationships

This work is not a member of any user collections.

Files (Count: 1; Size: 22.2 KB)

Thumbnailthumbnail-column Title Original Upload Last Modified File Size Access Actions
Dermatology_Clerkship_Chalk_Talk....xlsx 2022-04-18 2022-04-18 22.2 KB Open Access

Download All Files (To download individual files, select them in the “Files” panel above)

Best for data sets < 3 GB. Downloads all files plus metadata into a zip file.



Best for data sets > 3 GB. Globus is the platform Deep Blue Data uses to make large data sets available.   More about Globus

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.