Work Description

Title: Datasets and Analysis Syntax Pertaining to Social Judgment as a Function of Moral Domain Open Access Deposited

h
Attribute Value
Methodology
  • These data were collected via Qualtrics with participants gathered from Prolific Academic. The data was cleaned and analyzed using SPSS, with a couple of analyses (repeated measures correlations) being done in R.
Description
  • These materials are SPSS datasets and syntax files related to a project investigating the weight given to various moral domains when forming impressions of others. We looked at how participants' impressions of the moral character of social targets varied when provided with information that those targets behaved in ways that upheld or violated various moral domains. Following this, we also looked at whether participants' willingness to cooperate with a target changed based on those behaviors, and whether judgments following information about the social targets remained robust under cognitive load.
Creator
Creator ORCID
Depositor
  • snladams@umich.edu
Contact information
Discipline
Keyword
Resource type
Last modified
  • 06/12/2024
Published
  • 06/12/2024
Language
DOI
  • https://doi.org/10.7302/t6nt-wp37
License
To Cite this Work:
Adams, S. (2024). Datasets and Analysis Syntax Pertaining to Social Judgment as a Function of Moral Domain [Data set], University of Michigan - Deep Blue Data. https://doi.org/10.7302/t6nt-wp37

Relationships

This work is not a member of any user collections.

Files (Count: 19; Size: 19.8 MB)

Separate and Unequal: Moral Domains Differ in Corresponding Social Judgments of Others

======================================================================================

This set of studies were run between February of 2022 and July 2023 at the University of Michigan using participants from Prolific Academic.

PI: Savannah Adams (contact: snladams@umich.edu)
Research Supervisor: Dr. Oscar Ybarra

This research was conducted to investigate potential differences in the weight given to behaviors within various moral domains when forming social impressions of others. More specifically, we aimed to see if impressions of a social target's moral character differed based on whether participants were given information about a target's actions in line with or in violation of various moral domains.

Key Findings:
- In Study 1, judgments of a target's moral character differed as a function of moral domain, such that behaviors related to fairness or respect for property were judged in more extremes (e.g., higher judgments of a target's moral character following positive behaviors in these domains, and lower judgments of a target's moral character following negative behaviors in these domains). Attributions made about behaviors also differed such that behaviors in the fairness and property domains were more likely to be attributed to the target rather than the situation.

- In Study 2, the results from Study 1 were replicated and we also found that willingness to cooperate with a target differed as a function of moral domain. Behaviors in the fairness and property domains led to stronger judgments about whether someone would be willing to cooperate with a social target.

- In Study 3, we replicated the results of Study 1 and introduced a digit span task. Judgments about a social target's moral character were robust to cognitive load.

The following data files were analyzed in SPSS primarily, but there are some R files provided for obtaining specific descriptives (i.e., repeated measures correlations). All information about the variables can be found in the variables tab within SPSS for each dataset, with any additional created variables explained here or within the syntax.

NOTE: All files provided in this package are either primary data files, meaning that they appear as they would when first downloaded from Qualtrics, or processed files that have been altered to make analyses easier. However, all identifiable information has been removed in both the primary and processed data files. Long format processed files have also been included for ease of import into R for any rmcorr analyses.

In some cases, there is also an additional column included in the data labeled "COGCHECK_PASS". This is not included in the original Qualtrics but allows for quicker filtering of participants who did or did not pass the cognition check.

For Studies 1 and 2, the researchers did not include demographic questions in the surveys themselves. Demographic data was instead obtained via Prolific and was later incorporated into the datasets using Prolific ID information. This created some limits around the breadth of our demographic categories. Due to anonymity reasons, the full extent of the information collected and reported by Prolific could not be included in these datasets, but the specific age, ethnicity, and gender information as reported by Prolific are included in the processed data files.

List of Files
-------

*All survey files for the three studies in our manuscript (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study1_Survey.docx, Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study2_Survey.docx, Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study3_Survey.docx). A codebook is included with this package under the file name (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Codebook.csv). In this file, all variables are listed for each of the three processed datasets.

-------

* Study 1 primary data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_1_primary.sav). This dataset corresponds to the first study in our manuscript. This file is the primary data, meaning it is as it appears when first downloaded from Qualtrics (with minor alterations as detailed above). All identifiable information has been stripped, and the steps taken to transform it into the processed data file are detailed in the provided Study 1 syntax file as comments above the first breakpoint.

*Study 1 processed data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_1_processed.sav). This dataset is a ready-to-analyze version of the primary dataset provided for convenience. The syntax file includes all changes made to the primary dataset to create the processed dataset, and includes code for all analyses included in our manuscript.

*Study 1 syntax file (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Syntax_Study_1.sps). The SPSS syntax file for dataset cleaning and the analyses included in our manuscript.

*Study 1 long format processed data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_1_long.sav). This dataset includes the same information as the normal processed dataset but has already been converted to long format for use in R or in any additional analyses.

-------

* Study 2 primary data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_2_primary.sav). This dataset corresponds to the first study in our manuscript. This file is the primary data, meaning it is as it appears when first downloaded from Qualtrics (with minor alterations as detailed above). All identifiable information has been stripped, and the steps taken to transform it into the processed data file are detailed in the provided Study 1 syntax file as comments above the first breakpoint.

*Study 2 processed data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_2_processed.sav). This dataset is a ready-to-analyze version of the primary dataset provided for convenience. The syntax file includes all changes made to the primary dataset to create the processed dataset, and includes code for all analyses included in our manuscript.

*Study 2 syntax file (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Syntax_Study_2.sps). The SPSS syntax file for dataset cleaning and the analyses included in our manuscript.

*Study 2 long format processed data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_2_long.sav). This dataset includes the same information as the normal processed dataset but has already been converted to long format for use in R or in any additional analyses.
-------

Preregistration for Study 3 can be found as a pdf document in the files.

* Study 3 primary data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_3_primary.sav). This dataset corresponds to the first study in our manuscript. This file is the primary data, meaning it is as it appears when first downloaded from Qualtrics (with minor alterations as detailed above). All identifiable information has been stripped, and the steps taken to transform it into the processed data file are detailed in the provided Study 1 syntax file as comments above the first breakpoint.

*Study 3 processed data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_3_processed.sav). This dataset is a ready-to-analyze version of the primary dataset provided for convenience. The syntax file includes all changes made to the primary dataset to create the processed dataset, and includes code for all analyses included in our manuscript.

*Study 3 syntax file (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Syntax_Study_3.sps). The SPSS syntax file for dataset cleaning and the analyses included in our manuscript.

*Study 3 long format processed data (Moral_Domains_Social_Judgments_Study_3_long.sav). This dataset includes the same information as the normal processed dataset but has already been converted to long format for use in R or in any additional analyses.

Use and Access:
This data set is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Download All Files (To download individual files, select them in the “Files” panel above)

Best for data sets < 3 GB. Downloads all files plus metadata into a zip file.



Best for data sets > 3 GB. Globus is the platform Deep Blue Data uses to make large data sets available.   More about Globus

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.