FIP 5 phosphorylation during mitosis regulates apical trafficking and lumenogenesis
dc.contributor.author | Li, Dongying | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mangan, Anthony | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cicchini, Louis | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Margolis, Ben | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Prekeris, Rytis | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-23T15:59:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-01T15:48:46Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2014-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Li, Dongying; Mangan, Anthony; Cicchini, Louis; Margolis, Ben; Prekeris, Rytis (2014). " FIP 5 phosphorylation during mitosis regulates apical trafficking and lumenogenesis." EMBO reports 15(4): 428-437. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-221X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-3178 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106968 | |
dc.description.abstract | Apical lumen formation is a key step during epithelial morphogenesis. The establishment of the apical lumen is a complex process that involves coordinated changes in plasma membrane composition, endocytic transport, and cytoskeleton organization. These changes are accomplished, at least in part, by the targeting and fusion of Rab11/ FIP 5‐containing apical endosomes with the apical membrane initiation site ( AMIS ). Although AMIS formation and polarized transport of Rab11/ FIP 5‐containing endosomes are crucial for the formation of a single apical lumen, the spatiotemporal regulation of this process remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the formation of the midbody during cytokinesis is a symmetry‐breaking event that establishes the location of the AMIS . The interaction of FIP 5 with SNX 18, which is required for the formation of apical endocytic carriers, is inhibited by GSK ‐3 phosphorylation at FIP 5‐T276. Importantly, we show that FIP 5‐T276 phosphorylation occurs specifically during metaphase and anaphase, to ensure the fidelity and timing of FIP 5‐endosome targeting to the AMIS during apical lumen formation. Synopsis This study shows that epithelial lumen formation is regulated by FIP 5 phosphorylation, which inhibits its interaction with SNX 18 during metaphase and anaphase, ensuring that the transport of apical endocytic carriers happens only after the formation of the AMIS . FIP 5‐endosomes travel along the central spindle to the apical membrane initiation site ( AMIS ). FIP 5‐T276 phosphorylation by GSK ‐3 regulates the timing of apical lumen formation. The midbody formation during cytokinesis is a symmetry‐breaking event leading to the establishment of a single apical lumen site. This study shows that epithelial lumen formation is regulated by FIP5 phosphorylation, which inhibits its interaction with SNX18 during metaphase and anaphase, ensuring that the transport of apical endocytic carriers happens only after the formation of the AMIS. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Rab11 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 ( GSK ‐3) | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FIP 5 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cytokinesis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Apical Lumen | en_US |
dc.title | FIP 5 phosphorylation during mitosis regulates apical trafficking and lumenogenesis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/1/embr201338128-sup-0001-FigS1.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/2/embr201338128-SourceData-Fig4G.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/3/embr201338128-sup-0003-FigS3.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/4/embr201338128.reviewer_comments.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/5/embr201338128.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/6/embr201338128-sup-0004-FigS4.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/7/embr201338128-SourceData-Fig2B-C-D.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/8/embr201338128-sup-0005-FigS5.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/9/embr201338128-sup-0002-FigS2.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106968/10/embr201338128-sup-0006-Methods.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/embr.201338128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | EMBO reports | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wakefield JG, Stephens DJ, Tavare JM ( 2003 ) A role for glycogen synthase kinase‐3 in mitotic spindle dynamics and chromosome alignment. J Cell Sci 116: 637 – 646 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bryant DM, Datta A, Rodriguez‐Fraticelli AE, Peranen J, Martin‐Belmonte F, Mostov KE ( 2010 ) A molecular network for de novo generation of the apical surface and lumen. Nat Cell Biol 12: 1035 – 1045 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bryant DM, Mostov KE ( 2008 ) From cells to organs: building polarized tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 887 – 901 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Martin‐Belmonte F, Yu W, Rodriguez‐Fraticelli AE, Ewald AJ, Werb Z, Alonso MA, Mostov K ( 2008 ) Cell‐polarity dynamics controls the mechanism of lumen formation in epithelial morphogenesis. Curr Biol 18: 507 – 513 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Willenborg C, Jing J, Wu C, Matern H, Schaack J, Burden J, Prekeris R ( 2011 ) Interaction between FIP5 and SNX18 regulates epithelial lumen formation. J Cell Biol 195: 71 – 86 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gin E, Tanaka EM, Brusch L ( 2010 ) A model for cyst lumen expansion and size regulation via fluid secretion. J Theor Biol 264: 1077 – 1088 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hobdy‐Henderson KC, Hales CM, Lapierre LA, Cheney RE, Goldenring JR ( 2003 ) Dynamics of the apical plasma membrane recycling system during cell division. Traffic 4: 681 – 693 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schiel JA, Park K, Morphew MK, Reid E, Hoenger A, Prekeris R ( 2011 ) Endocytic membrane fusion and buckling‐induced microtubule severing mediate cell abscission. J Cell Sci 124: 1411 – 1424 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schiel JA, Simon GC, Zaharris C, Weisz J, Castle D, Wu CC, Prekeris R ( 2012 ) FIP3‐endosome‐dependent formation of the secondary ingression mediates ESCRT‐III recruitment during cytokinesis. Nat Cell Biol 14: 1068 – 1078 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Prekeris R, Klumperman J, Scheller RH ( 2000 ) A Rab11/Rip11 protein complex regulates apical membrane trafficking via recycling endosomes. Mol Cell 6: 1437 – 1448 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Su T, Bryant DM, Luton F, Verges M, Ulrich SM, Hansen KC, Datta A, Eastburn DJ, Burlingame AL, Shokat KM, Mostov KE ( 2010 ) A kinase cascade leading to Rab11‐FIP5 controls transcytosis of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor. Nat Cell Biol 12: 1143 – 1153 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schonteich E, Wilson GM, Burden J, Hopkins CR, Anderson K, Goldenring JR, Prekeris R ( 2008 ) The Rip11/Rab11‐FIP5 and kinesin II complex regulates endocytic protein recycling. J Cell Sci 121: 3824 – 3833 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Louie RK, Bahmanyar S, Siemers KA, Votin V, Chang P, Stearns T, Nelson WJ, Barth AI ( 2004 ) Adenomatous polyposis coli and EB1 localize in close proximity of the mother centriole and EB1 is a functional component of centrosomes. J Cell Sci 117: 1117 – 1128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Apodaca G, Gallo LI, Bryant DM ( 2012 ) Role of membrane traffic in the generation of epithelial cell asymmetry. Nat Cell Biol 14: 1235 – 1243 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ong Tone S, Dayanandan B, Fournier AE, Mandato CA ( 2010 ) GSK3 regulates mitotic chromosomal alignment through CRMP4. PLoS ONE 5: e14345 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tighe A, Ray‐Sinha A, Staples OD, Taylor SS ( 2007 ) GSK‐3 inhibitors induce chromosome instability. BMC Cell Biol 8: 34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Barr FA, Elliott PR, Gruneberg U ( 2011 ) Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitosis. J Cell Sci 124: 2323 – 2334 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cohen P, Goedert M ( 2004 ) GSK3 inhibitors: development and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 479 – 487 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Galvez‐Santisteban M, Rodriguez‐Fraticelli AE, Bryant DM, Vergarajauregui S, Yasuda T, Banon‐Rodriguez I, Bernascone I, Datta A, Spivak N, Young K, Slim CL, Brakeman PR, Fukuda M, Mostov KE, Martin‐Belmonte F ( 2012 ) Synaptotagmin‐like proteins control the formation of a single apical membrane domain in epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 14: 838 – 849 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vieira OV, Gaus K, Verkade P, Fullekrug J, Vaz WL, Simons K ( 2006 ) FAPP2, cilium formation, and compartmentalization of the apical membrane in polarized Madin‐Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 18556 – 18561 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Junutula JR, Schonteich E, Wilson GM, Peden AA, Scheller RH, Prekeris R ( 2004 ) Molecular characterization of Rab11 interactions with members of the family of Rab11‐interacting proteins. J Biol Chem 279: 33430 – 33437 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peden AA, Schonteich E, Chun J, Junutula JR, Scheller RH, Prekeris R ( 2004 ) The RCP‐Rab11 complex regulates endocytic protein sorting. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3530 – 3541 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.