Show simple item record

Longitudinal data analysis using the conditional empirical likelihood method

dc.contributor.authorHan, Peisongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSong, Peter X.‐k.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Luen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-03T16:51:23Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-09-03T16:51:23Z
dc.date.issued2014-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationHan, Peisong; Song, Peter X.‐k. ; Wang, Lu (2014). "Longitudinal data analysis using the conditional empirical likelihood method." Canadian Journal of Statistics 42(3): 404-422.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0319-5724en_US
dc.identifier.issn1708-945Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108267
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies a new approach to longitudinal data analysis using the conditional empirical likelihood (CEL) method within the framework of marginal models. The possible unbalanced follow‐up visits are dealt with via stratification according to distinctive follow‐up patterns. The CEL method does not require any explicit modelling of the variance–covariance of the longitudinal outcomes. Instead, it implicitly incorporates a consistently estimated variance–covariance matrix in a nonparametric fashion. The proposed CEL estimator is connected to the generalized estimating equations (GEE) estimator, and achieves the same efficiency as the GEE estimator employing the true variance–covariance. The asymptotic distribution of the CEL estimator is derived, and simulation studies are conducted to assess the finite sample performance. Data collected from a longitudinal nutrition study are analysed as an application. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 42: 404–422; 2014 © 2014 Statistical Society of Canada Résumé Les auteurs proposent une nouvelle approche pour l'analyse de données longitudinales à l'aide de la méthode de la vraisemblance empirique conditionnelle (VEC) dans le cadre de modèles marginaux. Ils prennent en compte la possibilité d'un suivi irrégulier en stratifiant selon les séquences de suivis observées. La VEC ne nécessite pas la modélisation explicite de la variance‐covariance des résultats longitudinaux, mais en intègre plutôt implicitement un estimateur non paramétrique convergent. La VEC est associée aux équations d'estimation généralisées (EEG), et les estimateurs découlant de la VEC atteignent la même efficacité que ceux des EEG basées sur la vraie structure de variance‐covariance. Les auteurs présentent la distribution asymptotique de l'estimateur de la VEC, ainsi qu'une étude de simulation afin d’évaluer la performance de la méthode sur des échantillons finis. Ils effectuent finalement l'analyse des données d'une étude longitudinale portant sur la nutrition. La revue canadienne de statistique 42: 404–422; 2014 © 2014 Société statistique du Canadaen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherMarginal Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherGeneralized Estimating Equations (GEE)en_US
dc.subject.otherUnbalanced Longitudinal Dataen_US
dc.subject.otherVariance–Covariance Matrixen_US
dc.subject.otherWithin‐Subject Correlationen_US
dc.subject.otherMSC 2010 : Primary 62F12en_US
dc.subject.otherSecondary 62J12en_US
dc.titleLongitudinal data analysis using the conditional empirical likelihood methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108267/1/cjs11221-sm-0001-SupInfo-S1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108267/2/cjs11221.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cjs.11221en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanadian Journal of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwen, A. ( 1990 ). Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Annals of Statistics, 18, 90 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai, T. L. & Small, D. S. ( 2007 ). Marginal regression analysis of longitudinal data with time‐dependentcovariates: a generalized method‐of‐moments approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series B, 69, 79 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi, Y. ( 2011 ). Efficient semiparametric regression for longitudinal data with nonparametric covariance estimation. Biometrika, 98, 355 – 370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiang, K. Y. & Zeger, S. L. ( 1986 ). Longitudinal data analysis using generalised linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. ( 1995 ). Modeling the drop‐out mechanism in repeated‐measures studies. Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association, 90, 1112 – 1121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. & Rubin, D. B. ( 2002 ). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeumann, C. G., Bwibo, N. O., Murphy, S. P., Sigman, M., Whaley, S., Allen, L. H., Guthrie, D., Weiss, R. E., & Demment, M. W. ( 2003 ). Animal source foods improve dietary quality, micronutrient status, growth and cognitive function in Kenyan School Children: Background, study design and baseline findings. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 3941S–3949S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewey, W. K. ( 1993 ). Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions. In Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 11. North‐Holland, Amsterdam.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwen, A. ( 1988 ). Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika, 75, 237 – 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, S., Qian, L., & Carroll, R. J. ( 2010 ). Generalized empirical likelihood methods for analyzing longitudinal data. Biometrika, 97, 79 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwen, A. ( 2001 ). Empirical Likelihood, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePan, J. & MacKenzie, G. ( 2003 ). Model selection for joint mean‐covariance structures in longitudinal studies. Biometrika, 90, 239 – 244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepe, M. S. & Anderson, G. ( 1994 ). A cautionary note on inference for marginal regression models withlongitudinal data and general correlated response data. Communications in Statistics: Simulationand Computation, 23, 939 – 951.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentice, R. L. & Zhao, L. P. ( 1991 ). Estimating equations for parameters in means and covariances of multivariate discrete and continuous responses. Biometrics, 47, 825 – 839.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQin, J. & Lawless, J. ( 1994 ). Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Annals of Statistics, 22, 300 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQu, A., Lindsay, B. G., & Li, B. ( 2000 ). Improving generalised estimating equations using quadratic inference functions. Biometrika, 87, 823 – 836.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, Y. G. & Carey, V. ( 2003 ). Working correlation structure misspecification, estimation and covariate design: Implications for generalized estimating equations performance. Biometrika, 90, 29 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, Y. G., & Lin, X. ( 2005 ). Effects of variance‐function misspecification in analysis of longitudinal data. Biometrics, 61, 413 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWedderburn, R. W. M. ( 1974 ). Quasi‐likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss‐Newton method. Biometrika, 61, 439 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss R. E. ( 2005 ). Modelling Longitudinal Data, Springer, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXue, L., & Zhu, L. ( 2007 ). Empirical likelihood semiparametric regression analysis for longitudinal data. Biometrika, 94, 921 – 937.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYe, H. & Pan, J. ( 2006 ). Modelling of covariance structures in generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data. Biometrika, 93, 927 – 941.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYou, J., Chen, G., & Zhou, Y. ( 2006 ). Block empirical likelihood for longitudinal partially linear regression models. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 34, 79 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang, J. & Gijbels, I. ( 2003 ). Sieve empirical likelihood and extensions of the generalized least squares, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 30, 1 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong, P. X.‐K. ( 2007 ). Correlated Data Analysis: Modelling, Analytics, and Applications. Springer, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChamberlain, G. ( 1987 ). Asymptotic efficiency in estimation with conditional moment restrictions. Journal of Econometrics, 34, 305 – 334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, R. J. ( 2007 ). Efficient information theoretic inference for conditional moment restrictions. Journal of Econometrics, 138, 430 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, J., Sitter, R. R. & Wu, C. ( 2002 ). Using empirical likelihood methods to obtain range restricted weights in regression estimators for surveys. Biometrika, 89, 230 – 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, J., Variyath, A. M. & Abraham, B. ( 2008 ). Adjusted empirical likelihood and its properties. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17, 426 – 443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle, P., Heagerty, P., Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. ( 2002 ). Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle, P. & Kenward, M. G. ( 1994 ). Informative drop‐out in longitudinal data analysis. Applied Statistics, 43, 49 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonald, S. G., Imbens, G. W. & Newey, W. K. ( 2003 ). Empirical likelihood estimation and consistent testswith conditional moment restrictions. Journal of Econometrics, 117, 55 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmerson, S. & Owen, A. ( 2009 ). Calibration of the empirical likelihood method for a vector mean. ElectronicJournal of Statistics, 3, 1161 – 1192.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGodambe, V. P. ( 1960 ). An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 31, 1208 – 1212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGodambe, V. P. ( 1991 ). Estimating Functions, Oxford University Press, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrendár, M. & Judge, G. ( 2009 ). Empty set problem of maximum empirical likelihood methods. ElectronicJournal of Statistics, 3, 1542 – 1555.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrendár, M. & Judge, G. Revised empirical likelihood. CUDARE Working Papers, page http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/91799/2/CUDARE2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen, B. E. ( 2014 ). Econometrics. Draft graduate textbook.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeyde, C. C. ( 1997 ). Quasi‐Likelihood and Its Application, Springer‐Verlag, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJiang, J., Luan, Y., & Wang, Y‐G. ( 2007 ). Iterative estimating equations: Linear convergence and asymptotic properties. Annals of Statistics, 35, 2233 – 2260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKauermann, G. & Carroll, R. J. ( 2001 ). A note on the efficiency of sandwich covariance matrix estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1387 – 1396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitamura, Y. ( 2007 ). Empirical likelihood methods in econometrics: Theory and practice. In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Vol. 3, Blundell, R., Newey, W. K., and Persson, T., editors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitamura, Y., Tripathi, G., & Ahn, H. ( 2004 ). Empirical likelihood‐based inference in conditional moment restriction models. Econometrica, 72, 1667 – 1714.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.