View Item 

Show simple item record

Manufacturing productivity and energy efficiency: a stochastic efficiency frontier analysis
dc.contributor.authorShui, Huanyien_US
dc.contributor.authorJin, Xiaoningen_US
dc.contributor.authorNi, Junen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T20:42:21Z
dc.date.available2016-12-01T14:33:05Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationShui, Huanyi; Jin, Xiaoning; Ni, Jun (2015). "Manufacturing productivity and energy efficiency: a stochastic efficiency frontier analysis." International Journal of Energy Research 39(12): 1649-1663.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0363-907Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-114Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113674
dc.publisherUniversity of Cambridge Presen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherbenchmarkingen_US
dc.subject.otherenergy efficiencyen_US
dc.subject.otherStochastic frontier analysisen_US
dc.titleManufacturing productivity and energy efficiency: a stochastic efficiency frontier analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113674/1/er3368.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/er.3368en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Energy Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd G, Dutrow E, Tunnessen W. The evolution of the ENERGY STAR energy performance indicator for benchmarking industrial plant manufacturing energy use. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008; 16.6: 708 – 715.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYalcintas M. An energy benchmarking model based on artificial neural network method with a case example for tropical climates. International Journal of Energy Research 2006; 30.14: 1158 – 1174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYalcintas M, Ozturk UA. An energy benchmarking model based on artificial neural network method utilizing US Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) database. International Journal of Energy Research 2007; 31.4: 412 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuck J, Young D. The potential for energy efficiency gains in the Canadian commercial building sector: a stochastic frontier study. Energy 2007; 32.9: 1769 – 1780.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConstantin PD, Martin DL, de Rivera y Rivera EBB. Cobb–Douglas, translog stochastic production function and data envelopment analysis in total factor productivity in Brazilian agribusiness. Journal of Operations and supply Chain Management 2009; 2.2: 20 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFilippini M, Hunt LC. US residential energy demand and energy efficiency: a stochastic demand frontier approach. Energy Economics 2012; 34.5: 1484 – 1491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhou P, Ang BW, Zhou DQ. Measuring economy‐wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Applied Energy 2011; 90.1: 196 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzadeh A, Asadzadeh SM, Nadimi V, Tajvidi A, Sheikalishahi M. A neuro fuzzy stochastic frontier analysis approach for long‐term natural gas consumption forecasting and behavior analysis: the cases of Bahrain. Saudi Arabia, Syria, and UAE, Applied Energy 2011; 88.11: 3850 – 3859.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmornkitvikai Y, Harvie C. Measuring technical inefficiency factors for Thai listed manufacturing enterprises: a stochastic frontier (SFA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). Australian Conference of Economists 2010: 1 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd GA. A method for measuring the efficiency gap between average and best practice energy use. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2005; 9.3: 51 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd GA. Estimating plant level energy efficiency with a stochastic frontier. The Energy Journal 2008; 29.2: 23 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd GA. Estimating the changes in the distribution of energy efficiency in the U.S. automobile assembly industry. Energy Economics 2014; 42: 81 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharles WC, Paul HD. A theory of production. The American Economic Review March 1928; 18.1: 139 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ. Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1973; 55.1: 28 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 1976; 6.1: 21 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeeusen W, Van den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production function with composed error. International Economic Review 1977; 18.2: 435 – 444.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. University of Cambridge Pres: Cambridge, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBattese GE, Coelli TJ. A model of technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 1995; 20.2: 325 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBattese GE, Coelli TJ. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1992; 3: 153 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTechnology Roadmap for Energy Reduction in Automotive Manufacturing, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Industrial Technologies Program, U. S Council for Automotive Research 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrends in Selected Manufacturing Sectors. Opportunities and challenges for environmentally preferable energy outcomes. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeven B, Weber C. Energy efficiency in innovative industries: application and benefits of energy indicators in the automobile industry, 2001 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry Proceedings Volume 1. American Council for an Energy‐Efficient Economy ( ACEEE ), Washington, D.C. 2001; 67 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeelis M, Ramirez A, Patel M, Farla J, Boonekamp P, Blok K. Energy efficiency developments in the Dutch energy‐intensive manufacturing industry 1980–2003. Energy Policy 2007; 35.12: 6112 – 6131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl‐Ghandoor A, Phelan PE, Villalobos R, Phelan BE. Modeling and forecasting the U.S. manufacturing aggregate energy intensity. International Journal of Energy Research 2008; 32.6: 50 – 513.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDincer I, Hussain MM, Al‐Zaharnah I. Analysis of sectoral energy and exergy use of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Energy Research 2004; 28.3: 205 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd G, Pang J. Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity. Energy Policy 2000; 28.5: 289 – 296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalitsky C, Worrell E. Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for the vehicle assembly industry: an ENERGY STAR guide for energy and plant managers, Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2008; [LBNL‐50939].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAguirre F, Villalobos JR, Phelan PE, Pacheco R. Assessing the relative efficiency of energy use among similar manufacturing industries. International Journal of Energy Research 2011; 35.6: 477 – 488.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrier JD, Hirschberg JG. Climate control efficiency. The Energy Journal 1992; 13.1: 37 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNassiri SM, Singh S. Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique. Applied Energy 2009; 86.7–8: 1320 – 1325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu JL, Wang SC. Total‐factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy 2006; 34.17: 3206 – 3217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChang TP, Hu JL. Total‐factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: an empirical study of China. Applied Energy 2010; 87.10: 3262 – 3270.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
er3368.pdf
Size:
2.536MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.