Show simple item record

My Heart Made Me Do It: Children’s Essentialist Beliefs About Heart Transplants

dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Meredith
dc.contributor.authorGelman, Susan A.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Steven O.
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Sarah‐jane
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T18:16:51Z
dc.date.available2018-11-01T16:42:00Zen
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.citationMeyer, Meredith; Gelman, Susan A.; Roberts, Steven O.; Leslie, Sarah‐jane (2017). "My Heart Made Me Do It: Children’s Essentialist Beliefs About Heart Transplants." Cognitive Science 41(6): 1694-1712.
dc.identifier.issn0364-0213
dc.identifier.issn1551-6709
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138236
dc.description.abstractPsychological essentialism is a folk theory characterized by the belief that a causal internal essence or force gives rise to the common outward behaviors or attributes of a category’s members. In two studies, we investigated whether 4â to 7â yearâ old children evidenced essentialist reasoning about heart transplants by asking them to predict whether trading hearts with an individual would cause them to take on the donor’s attributes. Control conditions asked children to consider the effects of trading money with an individual. Results indicated that children reasoned according to essentialism, predicting more transfer of attributes in the transplant condition versus the nonâ bodily money control. Children also endorsed essentialist transfer of attributes even when they did not believe that a transplant would change the recipient’s category membership (e.g., endorsing the idea that a recipient of a pig’s heart would act pigâ like, but denying that the recipient would become a pig). This finding runs counter to predictions from a strong interpretation of the â minimalistâ position, an alternative to essentialism.
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherPsychological essentialism
dc.subject.otherPsychology
dc.subject.otherChildren
dc.subject.otherConcepts
dc.subject.otherCausal reasoning
dc.titleMy Heart Made Me Do It: Children’s Essentialist Beliefs About Heart Transplants
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138236/1/cogs12431_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138236/2/cogs12431.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cogs.12431
dc.identifier.sourceCognitive Science
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRhodes, M., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2009 ). A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 244 â 274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInspector, I., Kutz, Y., & David, D. ( 2004 ). Another person’s heart: Magical and rational thinking in the psychological adaptation to heart transplantation. The Israeli Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 41, 161 â 173.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, C. N. ( 1990 ). If you had my brain, where would I be? Children’s understanding of the brain and identity. Child Development, 61, 962 â 972.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, C. N., & Jacobs, M. G. ( 2001 ). Enchanted objects: How positive connections transform thinking about the very nature of things. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeil, F. C. ( 1989 ). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeller, J. ( 2005 ). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686 â 702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKvaale, E., Haslam, N., & Gottdiener, W. ( 2013 ). The â side effectsâ of medicalization: A metaâ analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 782 â 794.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, S.â J. ( 2013 ). Essence and natural kinds: When science meets preschooler intuition. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorn (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology, Vol. 4. (pp. 108 â 165 ). New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMedin, D. L., & Ortony, A. ( 1989 ). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179 â 196 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer, M., Leslie, S. J., Gelman, S. A., & Stilwell, S. M. ( 2013 ). Essentialist beliefs about bodily transplants in the United States and India. Cognitive Science, 34, 668 â 719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. ( 1994 ). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and interpersonal influence. Ethos, 22, 158 â 186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, G. E., Herrmann, P., Wynn, K., & Keil, F. C. ( 2008 ). Biases towards internal features in infantsâ reasoning about objects. Cognition, 107, 420 â 432.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, G. E., & Keil, F. C. ( 2008 ). Where’s the essence? Developmental shifts in children’s beliefs about internal features. Child Development, 79, 1344 â 1356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanner, M. A. ( 2001a ). Exchanging spare parts or becoming a new person? People’s attitudes toward receiving and donating organs. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1491 â 1499.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanner, M. A. ( 2001b ). People’s feelings and beliefs about receiving transplants of different originsâ questions of life and death, identity, and nature’s border. Clinical Transplantation, 15, 19 â 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSetoh, P., Wu, D., Baillargeon, R., & Gelman, R. ( 2013 ). Young infants have biological expectations about animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 15937 â 15942.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSloman, S., & Malt, B. ( 2003 ). Artifacts are not ascribed essences, nor are they treated as belonging to kinds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 563 â 582.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, D. L. ( 2014 ). Dehumanization, essentialism, and moral psychology. Philosophy Compass, 9, 814 â 824.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrevens, M. ( 2000 ). The essentialist aspect of naive theories. Cognition, 74, 149 â 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrevens, M. ( 2001 ). Only causation matters: Reply to Ahn et al.. Cognition, 82, 71 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, M. G., Rhodes, M., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2009 ). Boys will be boys; cows will be cows: Children’s essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species. Child Development, 80, 461 â 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisberg, M. ( 2007 ). Three kinds of idealization. The Journal of Philosophy, 58, 207 â 233, 639â 659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiner, G. A., Cottrell, J. E., & Bica, L. A. ( 2009 ). When hearts, hands, and feet trump brains: Centralist versus peripheralist responses in children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 343 â 364.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., Shafto, P. ( 2001 ). Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 59 â 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarâ Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. ( 2011 ). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800 â 818.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDewar, K., & Xu, F. ( 2009 ). Do early nouns refer to kinds or distinct shapes? Psychological Science, 20, 252 â 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiesendruck, G., Goldfeinâ Elbaz, R., Rhodes, M., Gelman, S. A., & Neumark, N. ( 2013 ). Crossâ cultural differences in children’s beliefs about the objectivity of social categories. Child Development, 84, 1906 â 1917.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A. ( 2003 ). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. ( 1990 ). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2â yearâ old children. Developmental Psychology, 26, 796 â 804.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., Frazier, B. N., Noles, N. S., Manczak, E. M., & Stilwell, S. M. ( 2015 ). How much are Harry Potter’s glasses worth? Children’s monetary evaluation of authentic objects. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 97 â 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. ( 1986 ). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183 â 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. ( 1987 ). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532 â 1541.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. ( 1991 ). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the nonobvious. Cognition, 38, 213 â 244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham, S. A., Kilbreath, C. S., & Welder, A. N. ( 2004 ). Thirteenâ monthâ olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Development, 75, 409 â 427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeyman, G. D., & Gelman, S. A. ( 1999 ). The use of trait labels in making psychological inferences. Child Development, 70, 604 â 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeyman, G. D., & Gelman, S. A. ( 2000 ). Preschool children’s use of trait labels to make inductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 1 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHood, B. M., Gjersoe, N. L., Donnelly, K., Byers, A., & Itajkura, S. ( 2011 ). Moral contagion attitudes towards potential organ transplants in British and Japanese adults. Journal of Culture and Cognition, 11, 269 â 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoukes, W., & Vermaas, P. E. ( 2013 ). Pluralism on artefact categories: A philosophical defence. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4, 543 â 557.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.