Show simple item record

On the market viability under proportional transaction costs

dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorYu, Xiang
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-13T15:47:51Z
dc.date.available2019-09-04T20:15:39Zen
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.citationBayraktar, Erhan; Yu, Xiang (2018). "On the market viability under proportional transaction costs." Mathematical Finance 28(3): 800-838.
dc.identifier.issn0960-1627
dc.identifier.issn1467-9965
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/144662
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the market viability with proportional transaction costs. Instead of requiring the existence of strictly consistent price systems as in the literature, we show that strictly consistent local martingale systems (SCLMS) can successfully serve as the dual elements such that the market viability can be verified. We introduce two weaker notions of no arbitrage conditions on market models named no unbounded profit with bounded risk (NUPBR) and no local arbitrage with bounded portfolios (NLABPs). In particular, we show that the NUPBR and NLABP conditions in the robust sense are equivalent to the existence of SCLMS for general market models. We also discuss the implications for the utility maximization problem.
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othernuméraire portfolios
dc.subject.otherproportional transaction costs
dc.subject.other(robust) no unbounded profit with bounded risk
dc.subject.other(robust) no local arbitrage with bounded portfolios
dc.subject.otherstrictly consistent local martingale systems
dc.subject.othermarket viability
dc.subject.otherutility maximization
dc.titleOn the market viability under proportional transaction costs
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFinance
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144662/1/mafi12155.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144662/2/mafi12155_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/mafi.12155
dc.identifier.sourceMathematical Finance
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRásonyi, P. G. M. ( 2015 ). Fragility of arbitrage and bubbles in diffusion models. Finance and Stochastics, 19 ( 2 ), 215 – 231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBayraktar, E., & Yu, X. ( 2015 ). Optimal investment with random endowments and transaction costs: Duality theory and shadow prices. Availabe at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2779119
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecherer, D. ( 2001 ). The numeraire portfolio for unbounded semimartingales. Finance and Stochastics, 5 ( 3 ), 327 – 341.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrannath, W., & Schachermayer, W. ( 1999 ). A bipolar theorem for L + 0 ( Ω, F, P ). In J., Azéma et al. (Eds.), Séminaire de Probabilités, XXXIII. Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Vol. 1709, pp. 349 – 354 ). Berlin: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarr, P., Fisher, T., & Ruf, J. ( 2014 ). On the hedging of options on exploding exchange rates. Finance and Stochastics, 18 ( 1 ), 115 – 144.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoulli, T., Deng, J., & Ma, J. ( 2015 ). How non‐arbitrage, viability and numéraire portfolio are related. Finance and Stochastics, 19 ( 4 ), 719 – 741.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen, M. M., & Larsen, K. ( 2007 ). No arbitrage and the growth optimal portfolio. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 25 ( 1 ), 255 – 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCvitanić, J., & Karatzas, I. ( 1996 ). Hedging and portfolio optimization under transaction costs: A martingale approach. Mathematical Finance, 6 ( 2 ), 133 – 165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelbaen, F., & Schachermayer, W. ( 1994 ). A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. Mathematische Annalen, 300 ( 3 ), 463 – 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelbaen, F., & Schachermayer, W. ( 1995 ). The existence of absolutely continuous local martingale measures. Annals of Applied Probability, 5 ( 4 ), 926 – 945.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuasoni, P. ( 2002 ). Optimal investment with transaction costs and without semimartingales. Annals of Applied Probability, 12 ( 4 ), 1227 – 1246.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuasoni, P., Lépinette, E., & Rásonyi, M. ( 2012 ). The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs. Finance and Stochastics, 16 ( 4 ), 741 – 777.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuasoni, P., Rásonyi, M., & Schachermayer, W. ( 2008 ). Consistent price systems and face‐lifting pricing under transaction costs. Annals of Applied Probability, 18 ( 2 ), 491 – 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceImkeller, P., & Perkowski, N. ( 2015 ). The existence of dominating local martingale measures. Finance and Stochastics, 19 ( 4 ), 685 – 717.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJouini, E., & Kallal, H. ( 1995 ). Martingales and arbitrage in securities markets with transaction costs. Journal of Economic Theory, 66 ( 1 ), 178 – 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKabanov, Y., & Safarian, M. ( 2009 ). Markets with transaction costs: Mathematical theory. Springer Finance. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaratzas, I., & Kardaras, C. ( 2007 ). The numéraire portfolio in semimartingale financial models. Finance and Stochastics, 11 ( 4 ), 447 – 493.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramkov, D., & Schachermayer, W. ( 1999 ). The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Annals of Applied Probability, 9 ( 3 ), 904 – 950.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaris, F., Mbakop, E., & Sayit, H. ( 2011 ). Consistent price systems for bounded processes. Communications on Stochastic Analysis, 5 ( 4 ), 633 – 645.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProkaj, V., & Rásonyi, M. ( 2011 ). Local and true martingales in discrete time. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 325–332. (Translated from Teoriya Veroyatnosteĭieë Primeneniya, 55 ( 2 ), 398 – 404 (2010)).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRásonyi, P. G. M., & Schachermayer, W. ( 2010 ). The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for continuous processes under small transaction costs. Annals of Finance, 6 ( 2 ), 157 – 191.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuf, J., & Runggaldier, W. ( 2013 ). A systematic approach to constructing market models with arbitrage. Arbitrage, Credit and Information Risks. Proceeding of the Sino‐French Research Program in Financial Mathematics Conference, Beijing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSayit, H., & Viens, F. ( 2011 ). Arbitrage‐free models in markets with transaction costs. Electronic Communications in Probability, 16, 614 – 622.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchachermayer, W. ( 2015 ). Admissible trading strategies under transaction costs. In C., Donati‐Martin, A. Lejay, & A., Rouault (Eds.), Seminaire de Probabilite XLVI. Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Vol. 2123, pp. 317 – 331 ). Berlin: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakaoka, K., & Schweizer, M. ( 2014 ). A note on the condition of no unbounded profit with bounded risk. Finance and Stochastics, 18 ( 2 ), 393 – 405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu, X. ( 2017 ). Optimal consumption under habit formation in markets with transaction costs and random endowments. Annals of Applied Probability, 27 ( 2 ), 960 – 1002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnsel, J. P., & Stricker, C. ( 1994 ). Couverture des actifs contingents et prix maximum. Annales Institute Henri Poincaré Probability and Statistics, 30 ( 2 ), 303 – 315.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBayraktar, E., & Sayit, H. ( 2010 ). On the stickiness property. Quantitative Finance, 10 ( 10 ), 1109 – 1112.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.