Interactions between large and small detritivores influence how biodiversity impacts litter decomposition
Tonin, Alan M.; Pozo, Jesús; Monroy, Silvia; Basaguren, Ana; Pérez, Javier; Gonçalves, José F.; Pearson, Richard; Cardinale, Bradley J.; Boyero, Luz
2018-09
Citation
Tonin, Alan M.; Pozo, Jesús ; Monroy, Silvia; Basaguren, Ana; Pérez, Javier ; Gonçalves, José F. ; Pearson, Richard; Cardinale, Bradley J.; Boyero, Luz (2018). "Interactions between large and small detritivores influence how biodiversity impacts litter decomposition." Journal of Animal Ecology 87(5): 1465-1474.
Abstract
Understanding how biodiversity loss influences plant litter decomposition—that is, the biologically mediated conversion of coarse to fine particulate organic matter—is crucial to predict changes in the functioning of many stream ecosystems, where detrital food webs are dominant. Rates of litter decomposition are influenced by detritivore diversity, but the mechanisms behind this relationship are uncertain.As differences in detritivore body size are a major determinant of interspecific interactions, they should be key for predicting effects of detritivore diversity on decomposition. To explore this question, we manipulated detritivore diversity and body size simultaneously in a microcosm experiment using two small (Leuctra geniculata and Lepidostoma hirtum) and two large detritivore species (Sericostoma pyrenaicum and Echinogammarus berilloni) in all possible 1‐, 2‐ and 4‐species combinations, and litter discs of Alnus glutinosa.We expected that larger species would facilitate smaller species through the production of smaller litter fragments, resulting in faster decomposition and greater growth of smaller species in polycultures containing species of different body size. To examine this hypothesis, we used a set of “diversity–interaction” models that explored how decomposition was affected by different interspecific interactions and the role of body size, and quantified the magnitude of such effect through ratios of decomposition rates and detritivore growth between polycultures and monocultures.We found a clear positive effect of detritivore diversity on decomposition, which was mainly explained by facilitation and niche partitioning. Facilitation of small animals by larger ones was evidenced by a 12% increase in decomposition rates in polycultures compared to monocultures and the higher growth (20%) of small species, which partly fed on fine particulate organic matter produced by larger animals. When the large species were together in polycultures, decomposition was enhanced by 19%, but there were no changes in growth; niche partitioning was a plausible mechanism behind the increase in decomposition rates, as both species fed on different parts of litter discs, only one species being able to eat less palatable parts.Our study demonstrates that interspecific differences in body size should be taken into account in diversity–decomposition studies. Future studies should also consider differences in species’ vulnerability to extinction depending on body size and how this might affect ecosystem functioning in different scenarios of detritivore diversity and more complex food webs.Detritivore body size is a major determinant of interspecific interactions and should be key for predicting effects of detritivore diversity on decomposition. Here, the authors show that detritivore diversity enhances litter decomposition mainly due to facilitation of smaller detritivores by larger ones and niche partitioning between large species.Publisher
R Foundation for Statistical Computing Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
0021-8790 1365-2656
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.