Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross-sectional geometry
dc.contributor.author | Holcombe, Sven A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Yun‐seok | |
dc.contributor.author | Derstine, Brian A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Stewart C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Agnew, Amanda M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-12T16:22:34Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_13_MONTHS | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-12T16:22:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Holcombe, Sven A.; Kang, Yun‐seok ; Derstine, Brian A.; Wang, Stewart C.; Agnew, Amanda M. (2019). "Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross-sectional geometry." Journal of Anatomy 235(5): 883-891. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-8782 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-7580 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/152009 | |
dc.description.abstract | Here we present detailed regional bone thickness and cross-sectional measurements from full adult ribs using high resolution CT scans processed with a cortical bone mapping technique. Sixth ribs from 33 subjects ranging from 24 to 99 years of age were used to produce average cortical bone thickness maps and to provide average ± 1SD corridors for expected cross-section properties (cross-sectional areas and inertial moments) as a function of rib length. Results obtained from CT data were validated at specific rib locations using direct measurements from cut sections. Individual thickness measurements from CT had an accuracy (mean error) and precision (SD error) of -0.013 ± 0.167 mm (R2 coefficient of determination of 0.84). CT-based measurement errors for rib cross-sectional geometry were -0.1 ± 13.1% (cortical bone cross-sectional area) and 4.7 ± 1.8% (total cross-sectional area). Rib cortical bone thickness maps show the expected regional variation across a typical rib’s surface. The local mid-rib maxima in cortical thickness along the pleural rib aspect ranged from range 0.9 to 2.6 mm across the study population with an average map maximum of 1.4 mm. Along the cutaneous aspect, rib cortical bone thickness ranged from 0.7 to 1.9 mm with an average map thickness of 0.9 mm. Average cross-sectional properties show a steady reduction in total cortical bone area from 10% along the rib’s length through to the sternal end, whereas overall cross-sectional area remains relatively constant along the majority of the rib’s length before rising steeply towards the sternal end. On average, male ribs contained more cortical bone within a given cross-section than was seen for female ribs. Importantly, however, this difference was driven by male ribs having larger overall cross-sectional areas, rather than by sex differences in the bone thickness observed at specific local cortex sites. The cortical bone thickness results here can be used directly to improve the accuracy of current human body and rib models. Furthermore, the measurement corridors obtained from adult subjects across a wide age range can be used to validate future measurements from more widely available image sources such as clinical CT where gold standard reference measures (e.g. such as direct measurements obtained from cut sections) are otherwise unobtainable.Cortical Bone Mapping (CBM) of whole-rib CT scans was performed and maps of average adult cortical bone thickness and rib cross-sectional geometry were produced. Results were validated against cross-sectional rib histology images, whereby bone thickness accuracy was measured at under 0.02 mm and precision was measured at under 0.17 mm. Subsequent errors in bone cross-sectional area were under 5%. Results can drive advancements in the fidelity of current human body computational models. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | rib | |
dc.subject.other | cortical thickness | |
dc.subject.other | cortical bone | |
dc.subject.other | cross-sectional geometry | |
dc.subject.other | computed tomography | |
dc.subject.other | computational models | |
dc.title | Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross-sectional geometry | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152009/1/joa13045.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152009/2/joa13045_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/joa.13045 | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Anatomy | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sirmali M, Türüt H, Topçu S, et al. ( 2003 ) A comprehensive analysis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24, 133 - 138. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Choi H-Y, Kwak D-S ( 2011 ) Morphologic characteristics of Korean elderly rib. J Automot Saf Energy 2, 122 - 127. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Choi HY, Han J, Park Y, et al. ( 2009 ) Digital elderly human body modeling. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2262. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2262 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dominguez VM, Agnew AM ( 2019 ) The use of roi overlays and a 426 semi-automated method for measuring cortical area in imagej for histological analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 168, 378 - 382. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gayzik FS, Moreno DP, Geer CP, et al. ( 2011 ) Development of a full body CAD dataset for computational modeling: a multi-modality approach. Ann Biomed Eng 39, 2568 - 2583. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holcombe SA, Wang SC, Grotberg JB ( 2016 ) The effect of rib shape on stiffness. Stapp Car Crash J 60, 11 - 24. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holcombe SA, Wang SC, Grotberg JB ( 2017 ) The effect of age and demographics on rib shape. J Anat 231, 229 - 247. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holcombe SA, Hwang E, Derstine BA, et al. ( 2018 ) Measuring rib cortical bone thickness and cross section from CT. Med Image Anal 49, 27 - 34. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ito O, Dokko Y, Ohashi K ( 2009 ). Development of adult and elderly FE thorax skeletal models. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0381. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0381 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kemper AR, McNally C, Pullins CA, et al. ( 2007 ) The biomechanics of human ribs: material and structural properties from dynamic tension and bending tests. Stapp Car Crash J 51, 235 - 273. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kindig M, Lau AG, Kent RW ( 2011 ) Biomechanical response of ribs under quasistatic frontal loading. Traffic Inj Prev 12, 377 - 387. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Li Z, Kindig MW, Subit D, et al. ( 2010 ) Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction. Med Eng Phys 32, 998 - 1008. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mayeur O, Chaari F, Delille R, et al. ( 2010 ) A new method to determine rib geometry for a personalised. In Proceedings of International IRCOBI Conference, pp. 235-246. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mohr M, Abrams E, Engel C, et al. ( 2007 ) Geometry of human ribs pertinent to orthopedic chest-wall reconstruction. J Biomech 40, 1310 - 1317. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Murach MM, Kang Y-S, Goldman SD, et al. ( 2017 ) Rib geometry explains variation in dynamic structural response: potential implications for frontal impact fracture risk. Ann Biomed Eng 45, 2159 - 2173. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Murach MM, Kang Y-S, Bolte JH, et al. ( 2018 ) Quantification of skeletal and soft tissue contributions to thoracic response in a dynamic frontal loading scenario. Stapp Car Crash J, 62, 193 - 269. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Okoukoni C, Lynch SK, McTyre ER, et al. ( 2016 ) A cortical thickness and radiation dose mapping approach identifies early thinning of ribs after stereotactic body radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol, 119, 449 - 453. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Perz R, Toczyski J, Subit D ( 2015 ) Variation in the human ribs geometrical properties and mechanical response based on x-ray computed tomography images resolution. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41, 292 - 301. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schoell SL, Weaver AA, Vavalle NA, et al. ( 2015 ) Age and Sex-Specific thorax finite element model development and simulation. Traffic Inj Prev 16, S57 - S65. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stawicki SP, Grossman MD, Hoey BA, et al. ( 2004 ) Rib fractures in the elderly: a marker of injury severity. J Am Geriatr Soc 52, 805 - 808. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stein ID ( 1976 ) Rib structure and bending strength: an autopsy study. Calcif Tissue Res 20, 61 - 73. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Treece GM, Gee AH ( 2015 ) Independent measurement of femoral cortical thickness and cortical bone density using clinical CT. Med Image Anal 20, 249 - 264. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Treece GM, Gee AH, Mayhew PM, et al. ( 2010 ) High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Med Image Anal 14, 276 - 290. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang Y, Cao L, Bai Z, et al. ( 2016 ) A parametric ribcage geometry model accounting for variations among the adult population. J Biomech 49, 2791 - 2798. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Weaver AA, Schoell SL, Stitzel JD ( 2014 ) Morphometric analysis of variation in the ribs with age and sex. J Anat, 225, 246 - 261. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wuermser L-A, Achenbach SJ, Amin S, et al. ( 2011 ). What accounts for rib fractures in older adults? J Osteoporos, 2011, Article ID 457591, 6 pages. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Agnew AM, Moorhouse K, Kang Y-SS, et al. ( 2013 ) The response of pediatric ribs to quasi-static 412 loading: mechanical properties and microstructure. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 2501 - 2514. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Agnew AM, Murach MM, Dominguez VM, et al. ( 2018 ) Sources of variability in structural bending response of pediatric and adult human ribs in dynamic frontal impacts. Stapp Car Crash J 62, 119 - 192. | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.