Show simple item record

Custom Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis

dc.contributor.authorMurray, T.
dc.contributor.authorNair, V.
dc.contributor.authorAnnamalai, A.
dc.contributor.authorShah, P.
dc.contributor.authorMo, E.
dc.contributor.authorJin, S.
dc.contributor.authorGogia, R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T19:12:17Z
dc.date.available2021-04-29T19:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/167248
dc.identifier.urihttps://youtu.be/WzIbeCQQ7n8
dc.description.abstractOur work analyzed the relationship between the domain type of the word embeddings used to create sentiment analysis models and the domain of the sentiment analysis task. We used 3 corpora, (NYT, LION poems, and Book blurbs) to create our custom word embeddings and developed 9 different sentiment analysis models from our best word embeddings for each of the corpora. To compare our custom word embeddings against, we used 8 other pre-trained sentiment models including XLNet’s model, BERT (6 variations), and a simple skip-gram model used with Google vectors. Though we were hoping to prove that there was a clear advantage to using similar domains for the word embeddings as the dataset your sentiment model would be tested on, we concluded that more generally trained embeddings will outperform in-domain word embeddings.
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectsentiment analysis
dc.subjectcustom corpora
dc.titleCustom Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis
dc.typeTechnical Report
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.contributor.affiliationumComputer Science Engineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167248/1/Honors_Capstone_Murray_ProQuest_Sentiment_Analysis-Taylor_Murray.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167248/2/Honors_Capstone_Presentation_Murray_ProQuest_Sentiment_Analysis-Taylor_Murray.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/923
dc.working.doi10.7302/923en
dc.owningcollnameHonors Program, The College of Engineering


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.