Show simple item record

Implementation of the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) performance assessment tool in the emergency department: A pilot study

dc.contributor.authorHaas, Mary R. C.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Mallory G.
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Carrie E.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Rob
dc.contributor.authorScott, Kirstin W.
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Brian C.
dc.contributor.authorWnuk, Gregory M.
dc.contributor.authorBurkhardt, John
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T21:09:29Z
dc.date.available2024-03-03 16:09:27en
dc.date.available2023-03-03T21:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.citationHaas, Mary R. C.; Davis, Mallory G.; Harvey, Carrie E.; Huang, Rob; Scott, Kirstin W.; George, Brian C.; Wnuk, Gregory M.; Burkhardt, John (2023). "Implementation of the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) performance assessment tool in the emergency department: A pilot study." AEM Education and Training (1): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn2472-5390
dc.identifier.issn2472-5390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175906
dc.description.abstractBackgroundFeedback and assessment are difficult to provide in the emergency department (ED) setting despite their critical importance for competency-based education, and traditional end-of-shift evaluations (ESEs) alone may be inadequate. The SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) mobile application has been successfully implemented and studied in the operative setting for surgical training programs as a point-of-care tool that incorporates three assessment scales in addition to dictated feedback. SIMPL may represent a viable tool for enhancing workplace-based feedback and assessment in emergency medicine (EM).MethodsWe implemented SIMPL at a 4-year EM residency program during a pilot study from March to June 2021 for observable activities such as medical resuscitations and related procedures. Faculty and residents underwent formal rater training prior to launch and were asked to complete surveys regarding the SIMPL app’s content, usability, and future directions at the end of the pilot.ResultsA total of 36/58 (62%) of faculty completed at least one evaluation, for a total of 190 evaluations and an average of three evaluations per faculty. Faculty initiated 130/190 (68%) and residents initiated 60/190 (32%) evaluations. Ninety-one percent included dictated feedback. A total of 45/54 (83%) residents received at least one evaluation, with an average of 3.5 evaluations per resident. Residents generally agreed that SIMPL increased the quality of feedback received and that they valued dictated feedback. Residents generally did not value the numerical feedback provided from SIMPL. Relative to the residents, faculty overall responded more positively toward SIMPL. The pilot generated several suggestions to inform the optimization of the next version of SIMPL for EM training programs.ConclusionsThe SIMPL app, originally developed for use in surgical training programs, can be implemented for use in EM residency programs, has positive support from faculty, and may provide important adjunct information beyond current ESEs.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othersmartphone
dc.subject.othertechnology-enhanced education
dc.subject.otherassessment
dc.subject.othercompetency-based medical education
dc.subject.otherdirect observation
dc.subject.otheremergency medicine education
dc.subject.otherfeedback
dc.subject.othergraduate medical education
dc.subject.othermobile applications
dc.subject.otherresidency
dc.titleImplementation of the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) performance assessment tool in the emergency department: A pilot study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEmergency Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175906/1/aet210842_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175906/2/aet210842.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175906/3/aet210842-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aet2.10842
dc.identifier.sourceAEM Education and Training
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge BC, Bohnen JD, Schuller MC, Fryer JP. Using smartphones for trainee performance assessment: a SIMPL case study. Surgery. 2020; 167 ( 6 ): 903 - 906.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017; 39 ( 6 ): 609 - 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005; 39 ( 3 ): 309 - 317.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuckley C, Natesan S, Breslin A, Gottlieb M. Finessing feedback: recommendations for effective feedback in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2020; 75 ( 3 ): 445 - 451.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYarris LM, Linden JA, Gene Hern H, et al. Attending and resident satisfaction with feedback in the emergency department: feedback in the ED. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: S76 - S81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly E, Richards JB. Medical education: giving feedback to doctors in training. BMJ. 2019; 366: l4523.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinstein DF. Optimizing GME by measuring its outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377 ( 21 ): 2007 - 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichardson BK. Feedback. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11 ( 12 ): e1 - e5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Feedback in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20 ( S2 ): 460.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CPM, Lingard L. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 2014; 48 ( 7 ): 713 - 723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuijn CCMA, Welink LS, Mandoki M, ten Cate OTJ, Kremer WDJ, Bok HGJ. Am I ready for it? Students’ perceptions of meaningful feedback on entrustable professional activities. Perspect Med Educ. 2017; 6 ( 4 ): 256 - 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShayne P, Gallahue F, Rinnert S, Anderson CL, Hern G, Katz E. Reliability of a core competency checklist assessment in the emergency department: the standardized direct observation assessment tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13 ( 7 ): 727 - 732.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDehon E, Jones J, Puskarich M, Sandifer JP, Sikes K. Use of emergency medicine milestones as items on end-of-shift evaluations results in overestimates of residents’ proficiency level. J Grad Med Educ. 2015; 7 ( 2 ): 192 - 196.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarrington S, Beeson M, Bradford A. Inter-rater agreement of end-of-shift evaluations based on a single encounter. West J Emerg Med. 2017; 18 ( 3 ): 518 - 524.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandiera G, Lendrum D. Daily encounter cards facilitate competency-based feedback while leniency bias persists. CJEM. 2008; 10 ( 1 ): 44 - 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn B, Waring ED, Chacko J, Trovato G, Tice A, Greenstein J. Assessment of written feedback for emergency medicine residents. South Med J. 2020; 113 ( 9 ): 451 - 456.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson JL, Kay C, Jackson WC, Frank M. The quality of written feedback by attendings of internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30 ( 7 ): 973 - 978.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohnen JD, George BC, Williams RG, et al. The feasibility of real-time intraoperative performance assessment with SIMPL (system for improving and measuring procedural learning): early experience from a multi-institutional trial. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73 ( 6 ): e118 - e130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEaton M, Scully R, Schuller M, et al. Value and barriers to use of the SIMPL tool for resident feedback. J Surg Educ. 2019; 76 ( 3 ): 620 - 627.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunderson K, Sullivan S, Warner-Hillard C, et al. Examining the impact of ssing the SIMPL application on feedback in surgical education. J Surg Educ. 2018; 75 ( 6 ): e246 - e254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZendejas B, Toprak A, Harrington AW, Lillehei CW, Modi BP. Quality of dictated feedback associated with SIMPL operative assessments of pediatric surgical trainees. Am J Surg. 2021; 221 ( 2 ): 303 - 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge BC, Teitelbaum EN, Meyerson SL, et al. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Zwisch scale for the assessment of intraoperative performance. J Surg Educ. 2014; 71 ( 6 ): e90 - e96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTen Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015; 37 ( 11 ): 983 - 1002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTen Cate O. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5 ( 1 ): 157 - 158.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarraccio C, Wolfsthal SD, Englander R, Ferentz K, Martin C. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad Med. 2002; 77 ( 5 ): 361 - 367.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart D, Franzen D, Beeson M, et al. Integration of entrustable professional activities with the milestones for emergency medicine residents. West J Emerg Med. 2018; 20 ( 1 ): 35 - 42.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.