Damage to living trees contributes to almost half of the biomass losses in tropical forests
Zuleta, Daniel; Arellano, Gabriel; McMahon, Sean M.; Aguilar, Salomón; Bunyavejchewin, Sarayudh; Castaño, Nicolas; Chang-Yang, Chia-Hao; Duque, Alvaro; Mitre, David; Nasardin, Musalmah; Pérez, Rolando; Sun, I-Fang; Yao, Tze Leong; Valencia, Renato; Krishna moorthy, Sruthi M.; Verbeeck, Hans; Davies, Stuart J.
2023-06
View/ Open
Citation
Zuleta, Daniel; Arellano, Gabriel; McMahon, Sean M.; Aguilar, Salomón ; Bunyavejchewin, Sarayudh; Castaño, Nicolas ; Chang-Yang, Chia-Hao ; Duque, Alvaro; Mitre, David; Nasardin, Musalmah; Pérez, Rolando ; Sun, I-Fang ; Yao, Tze Leong; Valencia, Renato; Krishna moorthy, Sruthi M. ; Verbeeck, Hans; Davies, Stuart J. (2023). "Damage to living trees contributes to almost half of the biomass losses in tropical forests." Global Change Biology (12): 3409-3420.
Abstract
Accurate estimates of forest biomass stocks and fluxes are needed to quantify global carbon budgets and assess the response of forests to climate change. However, most forest inventories consider tree mortality as the only aboveground biomass (AGB) loss without accounting for losses via damage to living trees: branchfall, trunk breakage, and wood decay. Here, we use ~151,000 annual records of tree survival and structural completeness to compare AGB loss via damage to living trees to total AGB loss (mortality + damage) in seven tropical forests widely distributed across environmental conditions. We find that 42% (3.62 Mg ha−1 year−1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36–5.25) of total AGB loss (8.72 Mg ha−1 year−1; CI 5.57–12.86) is due to damage to living trees. Total AGB loss was highly variable among forests, but these differences were mainly caused by site variability in damage-related AGB losses rather than by mortality-related AGB losses. We show that conventional forest inventories overestimate stand-level AGB stocks by 4% (1%–17% range across forests) because assume structurally complete trees, underestimate total AGB loss by 29% (6%–57% range across forests) due to overlooked damage-related AGB losses, and overestimate AGB loss via mortality by 22% (7%–80% range across forests) because of the assumption that trees are undamaged before dying. Our results indicate that forest carbon fluxes are higher than previously thought. Damage on living trees is an underappreciated component of the forest carbon cycle that is likely to become even more important as the frequency and severity of forest disturbances increase.Tree mortality is typically considered the only source of biomass loss in forest systems. A pervasive but commonly neglected biomass loss is the damage to living trees (i.e., branchfall, trunk breakage, wood decay). We show that 42% of total aboveground biomass loss is due to damage to living trees across seven tropical forests. Our results contrast with the typically low forest biomass losses estimated only from tree mortality and suggest that forest carbon turnover may be higher than previously thought. Since forest disturbance rates are expected to increase under climate change, biomass loss to damage is likely to become more importantPublisher
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
ISSN
1354-1013 1365-2486
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.