Show simple item record

Effect of dose level on radiologists' detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: An observer study with breast phantoms.

dc.contributor.authorChan, HP
dc.contributor.authorHelvie, MA
dc.contributor.authorKlein, M.D., F.A.C.R., KA
dc.contributor.authorMclaughlin, C
dc.contributor.authorNeal, CH
dc.contributor.authorOudsema, R
dc.contributor.authorRahman, WT
dc.contributor.authorRoubidoux, MA
dc.contributor.authorHadjiiski, LM
dc.contributor.authorZhou, C
dc.contributor.authorSamala, RK
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T18:39:16Z
dc.date.available2024-03-15T18:39:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifier.issn1076-6332
dc.identifier.issn1878-4046
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32950384
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/192641en
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare radiologists’ sensitivity, confidence level, and reading efficiency of detecting microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) at two clinically relevant dose levels. Materials and Methods: Six 5-cm-thick heterogeneous breast phantoms embedded with a total of 144 simulated microcalcification clusters of four speck sizes were imaged at two dose modes by a clinical DBT system. The DBT volumes at the two dose levels were read independently by six MQSA radiologists and one fellow with 1–33 years (median 12 years) of experience in a fully-crossed counter-balanced manner. The radiologist located each potential cluster and rated its conspicuity and his/her confidence that the marked location contained a cluster. The differences in the results between the two dose modes were analyzed by two-tailed paired t-test. Results: Compared to the lower-dose mode, the average glandular dose in the higher-dose mode for the 5-cm phantoms increased from 1.34 to 2.07 mGy. The detection sensitivity increased for all speck sizes and significantly for the two smaller sizes (p <0.05). An average of 13.8% fewer false positive clusters was marked. The average conspicuity rating and the radiologists’ confidence level were higher for all speck sizes and reached significance (p <0.05) for the three larger sizes. The average reading time per detected cluster reduced significantly (p <0.05) by an average of 13.2%. Conclusion: For a 5-cm-thick breast, an increase in average glandular dose from 1.34 to 2.07 mGy for DBT imaging increased the conspicuity of microcalcifications, improved the detection sensitivity by radiologists, increased their confidence levels, reduced false positive detections, and increased the reading efficiency.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectDigital breast tomosynthesis
dc.subjectdose
dc.subjectmicrocalcifications
dc.subjectobserver study
dc.subjectBreast
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectCalcinosis
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectPhantoms, Imaging
dc.subjectRadiologists
dc.titleEffect of dose level on radiologists' detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: An observer study with breast phantoms.
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid32950384
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/192641/2/Medical Physics - 2023 - Chan - Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis Observer performance study of the.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.038
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22457
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Radiology
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-03-15T18:39:11Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7777-9006
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9257-2898
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0002-1971-7012
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4041-8394
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1970-0141
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6422-8555
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2069-8066
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0609-1658
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6661-4801
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Medical Physics - 2023 - Chan - Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis Observer performance study of the.pdf : Published version
dc.identifier.volume29 Sup 1
dc.identifier.startpageS42
dc.identifier.endpageS49
dc.identifier.name-orcidChan, HP; 0000-0001-7777-9006
dc.identifier.name-orcidHelvie, MA
dc.identifier.name-orcidKlein, M.D., F.A.C.R., KA; 0000-0001-9257-2898
dc.identifier.name-orcidMclaughlin, C; 0009-0002-1971-7012
dc.identifier.name-orcidNeal, CH; 0000-0002-4041-8394
dc.identifier.name-orcidOudsema, R
dc.identifier.name-orcidRahman, WT; 0000-0002-1970-0141
dc.identifier.name-orcidRoubidoux, MA; 0000-0001-6422-8555
dc.identifier.name-orcidHadjiiski, LM; 0000-0003-2069-8066
dc.identifier.name-orcidZhou, C; 0000-0002-0609-1658
dc.identifier.name-orcidSamala, RK; 0000-0002-6661-4801
dc.working.doi10.7302/22457en
dc.owningcollnameRadiology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.