Show simple item record

5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women Approved by the University of Michigan Medical School Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research (#1995-0343) Barbara Threatt, M.D., was a consultant regarding mammography practice and interactions with older women

dc.contributor.authorVan Harrison, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJanz, Nancy K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTedeschi, Philip J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xuelinen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Laurence F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:31:02Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2003-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationVan Harrison, R.; Janz, Nancy K.; Wolfe, Robert A.; Tedeschi, Philip J.; Huang, Xuelin; McMahon, Laurence F. (2003)."5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women Approved by the University of Michigan Medical School Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research (#1995-0343) Barbara Threatt, M.D., was a consultant regarding mammography practice and interactions with older women ." Cancer 97(5): 1147-1155. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34366>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34366
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12599219&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Major national interventions occurred in the early and mid-1990s to increase mammography screening rates among older women. The current study examined mammography utilization by older women during this period. Relation between mammography utilization and demographic measures and health care-related factors also were examined. METHODS A cross-sectional design examined variations in mammography during the 5 years between 1993 to 1997 in a representative sample of 10,000 female Medicare beneficiaries in Michigan age ≥ 65 years in 1993. Medicare and census data were used. Separate analyses were performed for having undergone any mammogram and, for the 5680 women who had undergone a mammogram, the number of mammograms. Relations were examined between mammography utilization and 15 demographic variables (e.g., age and African-American race) and health care-related variables (e.g., inpatient admissions and number of physicians involved in care). RESULTS In the 5 years 43% of older women had no evidence of having undergone a mammogram. Those with any mammogram averaged 2.8 mammograms. Meaningful independent predictors of both having undergone a mammogram and having more than one mammogram were more physicians involved in care, fewer inpatient admissions, and younger age. Having undergone a mammogram also was found to be associated with seeing an obstetrician/gynecologist. CONCLUSIONS Even with screening mammography as a covered benefit and after several national informational campaigns, the current study found that in 5 years, 60% of older women either had not undergone a mammogram or had undergone only 1. Intervention efforts should emphasize screening based on functional status, not age. This message should be targeted to physicians as well as to older women without claims for recent mammograms and who are likely to be in good health. Cancer 2003;97:1147–55. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11172en_US
dc.format.extent104708 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.title5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women Approved by the University of Michigan Medical School Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research (#1995-0343) Barbara Threatt, M.D., was a consultant regarding mammography practice and interactions with older womenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 936-1641 ; Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan, G-1105 Towsley Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0201en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDeparment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDeparment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Health Management and Policy and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid12599219en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34366/1/11172_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11172en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.