Show simple item record

Disposition of WR-1065 in the liver of tumor-bearing rats following regional vs systemic administration of amifostine

dc.contributor.authorLevi, Michaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeRemer, Susan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDou, Chunzhien_US
dc.contributor.authorEnsminger, William D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, David E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-19T13:41:52Z
dc.date.available2006-04-19T13:41:52Z
dc.date.issued2004-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLevi, Micha; DeRemer, Susan J.; Dou, Chunzhi; Ensminger, William D.; Smith, David E. (2004)."Disposition of WR-1065 in the liver of tumor-bearing rats following regional vs systemic administration of amifostine." Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition 25(1): 27-35. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34602>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0142-2782en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-081Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/34602
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14716750&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose —Amifostine is a prodrug in which selectivity is largely determined by the preferential formation and uptake of its cytoprotective metabolite, WR-1065, in normal tissues as a result of differences in membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase activity. It was hypothesized that amifostine may be a good candidate for regional drug delivery to the liver because of its large hepatic extraction and total body clearance. Methods —Rat livers were implanted with Walker-256 tumors. The tumor-bearing rats received 15 min infusions of amifostine (200 mg/kg) via the portal vein or the femoral vein. WR-1065 concentrations in the blood, liver and tumor were measured at various times. Results —The WR-1065 tumor portal dosing AUC 15−60 was 40% of systemic dosing, and tumor concentrations following portal dosing were one-fifth of that following systemic dosing. The portal dosing WR-1065 liver AUC 15−60 was 60% higher than the values for systemic dosing. The liver/tumor concentration ratios of WR-1065 following portal dosing were up to 8-fold higher than the ratio following systemic administration. Unfortunately, systemic exposure to WR-1065 was greater following portal vs systemic amifostine. Conclusions —Amifostine may provide increased liver protection and decreased tumor protection from radio- or chemotherapy when administered by the portal vein. However, portal dosing also increases systemic exposure to WR-1065, which is associated with hypotension. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent144722 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherChemistryen_US
dc.subject.otherFood Science, Agricultural, Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistryen_US
dc.titleDisposition of WR-1065 in the liver of tumor-bearing rats following regional vs systemic administration of amifostineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; Upjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; Box 0626, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0626, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUpjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUpjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUpjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; Department of Pharmacology and Internal Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; Upjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid14716750en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34602/1/380_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdd.380en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiopharmaceutics & Drug Dispositionen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.