Show simple item record

Dissolution Testing as a Prognostic Tool for Oral Drug Absorption: Dissolution Behavior of Glibenclamide

dc.contributor.authorLöbenberg, Raimaren_US
dc.contributor.authorDressman, Jennifer B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKrämer, Johannesen_US
dc.contributor.authorShah, Vinod P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmidon, Gordon L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-08T19:18:20Z
dc.date.available2006-09-08T19:18:20Z
dc.date.issued2000-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationLöbenberg, Raimar; Krämer, Johannes; Shah, Vinod P.; Amidon, Gordon L.; Dressman, Jennifer B.; (2000). "Dissolution Testing as a Prognostic Tool for Oral Drug Absorption: Dissolution Behavior of Glibenclamide." Pharmaceutical Research 17(4): 439-444. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41481>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0724-8741en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-904Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41481
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10870988&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose . The dissolution behavior of two commercially availableglibenclamide formulations was tested in various media. The aim of thestudy was to investigate whether the use of biorelevant dissolutionmedia (BDM) would be advantageous over the use of standard mediafor predicting the in vivo performance of the two formulations. Methods . The dissolution tests were performed using USP 23 apparatus2. Conventional buffers and USP media were compared with two BDMcontaining different amounts of lecithin and sodium taurocholate. Results . The dissolution of two drug powders was highly dependenton wetting, particle size, pH, and the composition of the mediumused. In addition, the dissolution behavior of the two glibenclamideformulations showed differences in all media tested. The dissolutionresults of the two formulations were compared with those from an in vivo bioequivalence study undertaken by the central quality controllaboratory of the German pharmacists (ZL). The bioequivalencecriterion set by the ZL requires more than 80;pc drug release within 10minutes. Results in FaSSIF, one of the BDMs, met the ZL criterionand this medium was also able to discriminate between the twoformulations. This was not the case for the other media tested. Conclusions . The study indicates that BDM are better able to discriminatebetween glibenclamide formulations than standard dissolutionmedia.en_US
dc.format.extent176747 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherBioequivalenceen_US
dc.subject.otherMedical Lawen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherBiochemistry, Generalen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacyen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacology/Toxicologyen_US
dc.subject.otherDissolution Testen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherGlibenclamideen_US
dc.titleDissolution Testing as a Prognostic Tool for Oral Drug Absorption: Dissolution Behavior of Glibenclamideen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitut für Pharmazeutische Technologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germany; College of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFood and Drug Administration, Rockville, Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLQS GmbH, Eschborn, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitut für Pharmazeutische Technologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid10870988en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41481/1/11095_2004_Article_222451.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007529020774en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePharmaceutical Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.