Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis
dc.contributor.author | Treynor, Wendy | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gonzalez, Richard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T14:39:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T14:39:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Treynor, Wendy; Gonzalez, Richard; Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan; (2003). "Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis." Cognitive Therapy and Research 27(3): 247-259. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44342> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0147-5916 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2819 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/44342 | |
dc.description.abstract | In an attempt to eliminate similar item content as an alternative explanation for the relation between depression and rumination, a secondary analysis was conducted using the data from S. Nolen-Hoeksema, J. Larson, and C. Grayson (1999). After constructing a measure of rumination unconfounded with depression content, support for a two factor model of rumination was found. These analyses indicate that the 2 components, reflective pondering and brooding, differentially relate to depression in terms of predictive ability and gender difference mediation. The results presented here support the general premise of Nolen-Hoeksema's Response Styles Theory (S. Nolen-Hoeksema 1987) that rumination can contribute to more depressive symptoms and to the gender difference in depression, but suggest important refinements of the theory. Such refinements include the need to differentiate between the reflective pondering component of rumination and the brooding component in rumination research. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 75672 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Plenum Publishing Corporation ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Depression | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Clinical Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Developmental Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cognitive Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Rumination | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychometrics | en_US |
dc.title | Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44342/1/10608_2004_Article_464752.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Cognitive Therapy and Research | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.