Performance Assessments of Nuclear Waste Repositories: A Dialogue on Their Value and Limitations
dc.contributor.author | Ewing, Rodney C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tierney, Martin S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Konikow, Leonard F. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rechard, Rob P. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T16:10:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T16:10:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ewing, Rodney C.; Tierney, Martin S.; Konikow, Leonard F.; Rechard, Rob P.; (1999). "Performance Assessments of Nuclear Waste Repositories: A Dialogue on Their Value and Limitations." Risk Analysis 19(5): 933-958. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45530> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-9147 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0272-4332 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45530 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10765440&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Performance Assessment (PA) is the use of mathematical models to simulate the long-term behavior of engineered and geologic barriers in a nuclear waste repository; methods of uncertainty analysis are used to assess effects of parametric and conceptual uncertainties associated with the model system upon the uncertainty in outcomes of the simulation. PA is required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as part of its certification process for geologic repositories for nuclear waste. This paper is a dialogue to explore the value and limitations of PA. Two “skeptics” acknowledge the utility of PA in organizing the scientific investigations that are necessary for confident siting and licensing of a repository; however, they maintain that the PA process, at least as it is currently implemented, is an essentially unscientific process with shortcomings that may provide results of limited use in evaluating actual effects on public health and safety. Conceptual uncertainties in a PA analysis can be so great that results can be confidently applied only over short time ranges, the antithesis of the purpose behind long-term, geologic disposal. Two “proponents” of PA agree that performance assessment is unscientific, but only in the sense that PA is an engineering analysis that uses existing scientific knowledge to support public policy decisions, rather than an investigation intended to increase fundamental knowledge of nature; PA has different goals and constraints than a typical scientific study. The “proponents” describe an ideal, six-step process for conducting generalized PA, here called probabilistic systems analysis (PSA); they note that virtually all scientific content of a PA is introduced during the model-building steps of a PSA; they contend that a PA based on simple but scientifically acceptable mathematical models can provide useful and objective input to regulatory decision makers. The value of the results of any PA must lie between these two views and will depend on the level of knowledge of the site, the degree to which models capture actual physical and chemical processes, the time over which extrapolations are made, and the proper evaluation of health risks attending implementation of the repository. The challenge is in evaluating whether the quality of the PA matches the needs of decision makers charged with protecting the health and safety of the public. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 230563 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; Society for Risk Analysis ; Springer Science+Business Media | en_US |
dc.subject.other | 40 CFR 191 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Environmental Management | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Probabilistic Systems Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Geohydrology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Engineering Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Compliance Certification Application | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Geochemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Performance Assessment | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Radioactive Waste | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Scientific Validity | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Uncertainty | en_US |
dc.title | Performance Assessments of Nuclear Waste Repositories: A Dialogue on Their Value and Limitations | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Engineering (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-2104 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | U.S. Geological Survey, 431 National Center, Reston, Virginia, 20192 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87185-1328 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87185-1328 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 10765440 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45530/1/11161_2004_Article_220844.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007070627983 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Risk Analysis | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.