A comparison of two forest stands at the University of Michigan Biological Station.
dc.contributor.author | Etter, Matthew A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Otterson, Julie R. | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | UMBS Station | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Grapevine Trail | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Pine Point - Douglas Lake | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-06-14T22:39:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-06-14T22:39:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54669 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Grapevine Point stand and Pine Point stand at UMBS differ considerably in structure and in species composition, two vegetation parameters known to influence habitat choice in migrant breeding birds. The stands are of similar age. The largest determinant of the current differences between the stands is likely soil moisture, followed by soil nutrient content, and finally by the availability of propagules for colonization in early secondary succession. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1326741 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3144 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.relation.haspart | Map | en_US |
dc.relation.haspart | Table of Numbers | en_US |
dc.subject | Field Biology of Plants | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of two forest stands at the University of Michigan Biological Station. | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resource and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Biological Station, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54669/1/3109.pdf | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 3109.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.