Evaluating Medical Student Clinical Skill Performance
dc.contributor.author | Calhoun, Judith G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Woolliscroft, James O. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Haken, Jocelyn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wolf, Fredric M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Wayne K. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T19:25:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T19:25:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Calhoun, Judith; Woolliscroft, James; Haken, Jocelyn; Wolf, Fredric; Davis, Wayne (1988). "Evaluating Medical Student Clinical Skill Performance." Evaluation & the Health Professions 2(11): 201-212. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67395> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0163-2787 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67395 | |
dc.description.abstract | Second-year medical students (N = 187) evaluated their own videotaped performances of one of eight randomly assigned physical assessment examinations. The videotaped performance was one component of an introduction to clinical sciences course evaluation. Performance ratings were also obtained from two peers-one who served as the patient and the other who served as the camera person for the evaluation-and one expert. All rater groups used the same behaviorally anchored evaluation checklist of the key techniques and sequences identifiedfor each examination. High Pearsonproduct-moment correlations were obtained between (1) the two peer ratings for four of the examinations and (2) self andpeer ratings for the other four examinations. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the four types of raters for all but one of the eight different examinations. Implications for future evaluation methodologies and curricular implementation of peer assessment are discussed. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 904066 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluating Medical Student Clinical Skill Performance | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Departments of Postgraduate Medicine, Health Professions Education, and Internal Medicine University of Michigan Medical School | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67395/2/10.1177_016327878801100204.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/016327878801100204 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ARNOLD, L., L. WILLOUGHBY, V. CALKINS, L. GAMMON, and G. EBERHARDT (1981) "Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students."J. of Medical Education36 (January): 35-42. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | CARTER, H. D. (1962) "How reliable are good oral examinations?"California J. of Educ. Research13 (September): 147-153. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ENGEBRETSEN, B. (1977) "Peer review in graduate education."New England J. of Medicine296 (May): 1230-1231. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | HAMMOND, K. R. and F. KERN [eds.] (1959) Teaching Comprehensive Medical Care. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | KANE, J. S. and E. E. LAWLER (1978) "Methods of peer assessment."Psych. Bull. 85 (March): 555-586. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | KUBANY, A. J. (1957) "Use of sociometric peer nominations in medical education."J. of Applied Psychology41 (June): 389-394. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | LINN, B. S., M. AROSTEGUI, and R. ZEPPA (1975) "Performance rating scale for peer and self assessment."British J. of Medical Education9 (June): 98-101. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | PEPE, E. A., C. G. HODEL, and D. A. BOSSHART (1980) "Use of peers to teach interviewing and clinical problem-solving."J. of Medical Education55 (September): 800-800. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | PETERSON, P. (1972) "Teaching peer review."J. of the Amer. Medical Assn. 224 (May): 884-885. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.