Show simple item record

Using Quantitative and Qualitative Methods to Pretest the Publication Take Charge of Your Diabetes: A Guide for Care

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Lynda A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSatterfield, Dawnen_US
dc.contributor.authorGerman, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Robert M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:44:57Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:44:57Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, Lynda; Satterfield, Dawn; German, Robert; Anderson, Robert (1996). "Using Quantitative and Qualitative Methods to Pretest the Publication Take Charge of Your Diabetes: A Guide for Care." The Diabetes Educator 22(6): 598-604. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68540>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0145-7217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68540
dc.description.abstractQuantitative and qualitative methods used to pretest the guidebook Take Charge of Your Diabetes: A Guide for Care are presented in this paper. Questionnaires were used as the quantitative method (completed by 59 diabetes educators and 301 people with diabetes) and focus groups were used as the qualitative method (3 groups composed of 22 black men and women with diabetes) to examine the relevance, purpose, content, and presentation of the Guide. Findings from between-methods triangulation supported the relevance, clarity Of messages, identification of groups that would be most likely to benefit, readability, understandability, and credibility of the Guide. Specific areas that needed modification were identified. Each evaluation method provided unique data; for example, quantifiable data on intention to change behavior was provided from one method and a recommendation that diversity be maintained was provided from the other method, The relative strengths and limitations of combining quantitative and qualitative approaches are described.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent635789 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleUsing Quantitative and Qualitative Methods to Pretest the Publication Take Charge of Your Diabetes: A Guide for Careen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Careen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia and the University of Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Adult and Community Healthen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Diabetes Translationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Cancer Prevention and Controlen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68540/2/10.1177_014572179602200608.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/014572179602200608en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Diabetes Educatoren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFunnell MM, Haas LB National standards for diabetes self-management education programs. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 100-16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuchin SP, Brown SA Patients should participate in designing diabetes educational content. Patient Educ Counsel 1990;16:255-67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosey GM, Freeman WL, Stracqualursi F. Gohdes D. Designing and evaluating diabetes education material for American Indians. Diabetes Educ 1990;16(5):407-14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteckler A., Eng E., Goodman RM Integrating qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods. Hygiene 1991/1992;10:16-20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuatromoni PA, Mibbauer M., Posner BM, et al. Use of focus groups to explore nutrition practices and health beliefs of urban Caribbean Latinos with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1994; 17:869-73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson RM, Barr PA, Edward GJ, et al. Using focus groups to identify psychosocial issues facing urban African Americans with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 1996;22(1):28-33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSatterfield DW, Edgar TM, Erlich AB, et al. Assessing community perceptions of diabetes using a qualitative education tool. Diabetes 1996;45 (2):44A.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKingry MJ, Tiddje LB, Friedman LL Focus groups: a research technique for nursing. Nurs Res 1990;39: 124-25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Take charge of your diabetes: a guide for care. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Division of Diabetes Translation, 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Diabetes Advisory Board. The national long-range plan to combat diabetes. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 1988; NIH publication no. 88-1587.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFunnell MM, Donnelly MB, Anderson RM, Johnson PD, Oh MS Perceived effectiveness, cost, and availability of patient education methods and materials. Diabetes Educ 1992;18(2): 139-45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYasenchak PA Bridle MJ A low-literacy skin care manual for spinal cord injury patients. Patient Educ Couns 1993 ;22:1-5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernier MJ, Yasko J. Designing and evaluating printed education materials: model and instrument development. Patient Educ Couns 1991; 18:253-63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and treatment of complications of diabetes: a guide for primary care practitioners. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSatterfield D., Lyons A. Development of a consensus publication by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC): the prevention and treatment of complications of diabetes — a guide for primary care practitioners. Diabetes Educ 1992; 18(6):473-75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration. Pretesting is essential; you can choose from various methods. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, Office for Substance Abuse Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1992, ADAMHA publication no. MS428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoper WL Health communication takes on new dimensions at CDC. Public Health Rep 1993; 108:179-83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHilltleman D. Readability, readability formulas, and cloze: selecting instructional materials. J Reading 1987;22: 117-22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePastore PO, Berg BK The evaluation of patient education materials: focus on readability. Patient Educ Counsel 1987;9:216-19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHealth Promotion Council of Southeastem Pennsylvania Health Literacy Project. A focus group evaluation of Take Charge of Your Diabetes: A Guide for Care. Philadelphia, Pa: submitted to CDC, Division of Diabetes Translation, April, 1994 ; project no. 93-231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy ME Methodological triangulation: a vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. IMAGE: J Nurs Scholar 1987 ; 19:130-33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreitmayer BJ, Ayres L., Knafl KA Triangulation in qualitative research: evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes. IMAGE: J Nurs Scholar 1993:25:237-43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanik BJ Applying triangulation in nursing research. Applied Nurs Res 1993;6:47-52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchanan DR An uneasy alliance: combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Health Educ Q 1992:19:117-35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteckler A., Mc Leroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, Mc Cormick L. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Educ Q 1992;19:1-8.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.