Show simple item record

Growth textures of thick sputtered films and multilayers assessed via synchrotron transmission Laue

dc.contributor.authorVill, M. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRek, Z. U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYalisove, Steven M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBilello, John C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T23:33:55Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T23:33:55Z
dc.date.issued1995-09-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationVill, M. A.; Rek, Z. U.; Yalisove, S. M.; Bilello, J. C. (1995). "Growth textures of thick sputtered films and multilayers assessed via synchrotron transmission Laue." Journal of Applied Physics 78(6): 3812-3819. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71326>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71326
dc.description.abstractThe growth textures of thick sputtered Mo metallizations and Mo/W multilayers, were characterized via a synchrotron white‐beam (WB) x‐ray transmission Laue technique. Transmission x‐ray diffraction studies of Mo specimens up to 61 μm thick were performed with WB synchrotron radiation; while the practical thickness limit for similar observations using a conventional laboratory Cu K(α) x‐ray source is ten times smaller. This unique approach used polychromatic x rays to simultaneously produce diffraction from a wide spread of orientations of many crystallographic planes for all the grains within a relatively large specimen volume (≊60×106 μm3). These patterns were obtained for polycrystalline 31‐ and 61‐μm‐thick Mo/W multilayer specimens, and a 35‐μm‐thick‐monolithic Mo foil specimen. In all three cases the alignment of specimen grains was similar to what would be expected for single‐crystal transmission patterns, except that the recorded intensity distributed was less localized. The WB transmission images were indexed using a reciprocal space construction for the Laue case. In the multilayers, the grains were oriented out‐of‐plane such that ⟨110⟩ crystallographic planes were aligned in the direction of sputter growth, while in the monolithic Mo specimen ⟨111⟩ crystallographic planes were so aligned, i.e., perpendicular to the deposition substrate. A spread in orientation of ∼5° was measured in the multilayer specimens, while the monolithic Mo specimen showed a spread of ∼30° when compared to a perfect single‐crystal orientation. Preferred orientation was also observed within the plane of growth to varying degrees for all three samples. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.  en_US
dc.format.extent3102 bytes
dc.format.extent1097587 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherThe American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.titleGrowth textures of thick sputtered films and multilayers assessed via synchrotron transmission Laueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐2136en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐2136en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherStanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, Stanford, California 94305en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71326/2/JAPIAU-78-6-3812-1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.360746en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Applied Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. A. Thornton, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 7, 239 (1977).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. R. M. Grovenor, H. T. G. Henzel, and D. A. Smith, Acta. Metall. 32, 773 (1984).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Knotek, F. Loffler, and G. Kramer, Surf. Coat. Technol. 54, 241 (1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Giron and P. Boher, Thin Solid Films 226, 9 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. W. Hoogenhof and T. W. Ryan, J. Magn. Mater. 121, 88 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceV. M. Fedosyuk and O. I. Kasyutich, Thin Solid Films 230, 4 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. von Laue, “Historical Introduction,” International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Volume 1 (Kynoch, Birmingham, England, 1952), pp. 1–5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. R. Stock, Y. H. Cheng, P. C. Huang, Z. U. Rek, and B. M. Ditchek, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 1737 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference’D. B. Cullity, Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. P. Adams, M. Viil, J. Tao, J. C. Bilello, and S. M. Yalisove, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 15 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Vill, D. P. Adams, S. M. Yasilove, and J. C. Bilello, Acta. Metall. Mater. 43, 427 (1995).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. W. Hull, Phys. Rev. 10, 661 (1917).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. L. Amoros, M. J. Buerger, and M. L. Canut de Amoros, The Laue Method (Academic, New York, 1974).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference“Times random” scale is a convention for quantifying texture which appears in many references, one of which is C. S. Barrett and T. B. Massalski, Structure of Metals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), pp. 541–567.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Vill, S. G. Malhotra, Z. Rek, S. M. Yalisove, and J. C. Bilello, Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1994), Vol. 317, p. 413.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. W. Andrews, D. J. Dyson, and S. F. Keown, Interpretation of Electron Diffraction Patterns (Plenum, New York, 1967).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePopLa, Orientation Distribution Software, Los Alamos Labs, University of California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Brennan and P. L. Cowan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 850 (1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. F. M. Henry, H. Lipson, and W. A. Wooster, The Interpretation of X-ray Diffraction Photographs (MacMillan, London, 1961).en_US
dc.owningcollnamePhysics, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.