View Item 

Show simple item record

Tracking Inner City Substance Users from the Emergency Department: How Many Contacts Does It Take?
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Rebecca M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWalton, Maureen A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Shanti P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOutman, Ryanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Reganen_US
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Brenda M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:51:46Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2008-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationCunningham, Rebecca; Walton, Maureen A.; Tripathi, Shanti P.; Outman, Ryan; Murray, Regan; Booth, Brenda M. (2008). "Tracking Inner City Substance Users from the Emergency Department: How Many Contacts Does It Take?." Academic Emergency Medicine 15(2): 136-143. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73960>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73960
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18275443&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent126685 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2008 Blackwell Publishing, Incen_US
dc.subject.otherCocaineen_US
dc.subject.otherAlcoholen_US
dc.subject.otherEmergency Departmenten_US
dc.subject.otherResearch Methodologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAttritionen_US
dc.subject.otherLongitudinalen_US
dc.titleTracking Inner City Substance Users from the Emergency Department: How Many Contacts Does It Take?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid18275443en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73960/1/j.1553-2712.2008.00033.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00033.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLongabaugh R, Woolard RE, Nirenberg TD, et al. Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department. J Stud Alcohol. 2001; 62 ( 6 ): 806 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolard RH, Carty K, Wirtz P, et al. Research fundamentals: follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: addressing subject attrition. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 859 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown SS. Drawing women into prenatal care. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989; 21 ( 2 ): 73 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcArdle JJ, Hamagami F. Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. Exp Aging Res. 1992; 18 ( 3–4 ): 145 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazumdar S, Liu KS, Houck PR, Reynolds CF III. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal clinical trials: coping with the challenge of missing values. J Psychiatr Res. 1999; 33 ( 2 ): 87 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu MC, Albert PS, Wu BU. Adjusting for drop-out in clinical trials with repeated measures: design and analysis issues. Stat Med. 2001; 20 ( 1 ): 93 – 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibsil K, Walton MA, Mowbray CT, Luke DA, Davidson WI, Boots-Miller BJ. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Eval Program Plann. 1996; 19: 1 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTwitchell GR, Hertzog CA, Klein JL, Schuckit MA. The anatomy of a follow-up. Br J Addict. 1992; 87 ( 9 ): 1327 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernstein E, Bernstein J, Levenson S. Project ASSERT: an ED-based intervention to increase access to primary care, preventive services, and the substance abuse treatment system. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 30: 181 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCapaldi D, Patterson GR. An approach to the problem of recruitment and retention rates for longitudinal research. Behav Assess. 1987; 9: 169 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMello MJ, Nirenberg TD, Longabaugh R, et al. Emergency department brief motivational interventions for alcohol with motor vehicle crash patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45 ( 6 ): 620 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeumann T, Neuner B, Weiss-Gerlach E, et al. The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006; 61 ( 4 ): 805 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeuner B, Fleming M, Born R, et al. Predictors of loss to follow-up in young patients with minor trauma after screening and written intervention for alcohol in an urban emergency department. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007; 68 ( 1 ): 133 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClaus RE, Kindleberger LR, Dugan MC. Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study of substance abusers. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002; 34 ( 1 ): 69 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarmor JK, Oliveria SA, Donahue RP, et al. Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44 ( 6 ): 531 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBooth BM, Weber JE, Walton MA, et al. Characteristics of cocaine users presenting to an emergency department chest pain observation unit. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 329 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham RM, Walton MA, Tripathi SP, Weber J, Maio RF, Booth BM. Past year violence typologies among patients with cocaine related chest pain. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007; 33 ( 4 ): 571 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan Department of Community Health. Census 2000. 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSobell LC, Sobell MB. Self-report issues in alcohol abuse: State of the art and future directions. Behav Assess. 1990; 12: 91 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabor TF, Kranzler HR, Lauerman RJ. Early detection of harmful alcohol consumption: comparison of clinical, laboratory, and self-report screening procedures. Addict Behav. 1989; 14 ( 2 ): 139 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHser YI, Maglione M, Boyle K. Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients, and arrestees. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999; 25 ( 1 ): 81 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith GR, Burnam MA, Mosley CL, Hollenberg JA, Mancino M, Grimes W. Reliability and validity of the substance abuse outcomes module. Psychiatr Serv. 2006; 57 ( 10 ): 1452 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV Draft Criteria. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller WR, Tonigan JS, Longbaugh R. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInc): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 4. DHHS Publication No. 95–3911. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith GR, Burnam MA, Mosley CL, Hollenberg JA, Mancino M, Grimes W. Measuring substance abuse treatment and outcomes: the reliability and validity of the Substance Abuse Outcomes Module. Psychiatr Serv. 2006; 57: 1452 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCottler LB, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview. Br J Addict. 1989; 84 ( 7 ): 801 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9 ( 3 ): 199 – 213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen WB, Tobler NS, Graham JW. Attrition in substance abuse prevention research: a meta-analysis of 85 longitudinally followed cohorts. Eval Rev. 1990; 14 ( 6 ): 677 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalton MA, Ramanathan CS, Reischl TM. Tracking substance abusers in longitudinal research: understanding follow-up contact difficulty. Am J Commun Psychol. 1998; 26 ( 2 ): 233 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemes S, Wish E, Wraight B, Messina N. Correlates of treatment follow-up difficulty. Subst Use Misuse. 2002; 37 ( 1 ): 19 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott CK. A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 74 ( 1 ): 21 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDigiusto E, Panjari M, Gibson A, Rea F. Follow-up difficulty: correlates and relationship with outcome in heroin dependence treatment in the NEPOD study. Addict Behav. 2006; 31 ( 7 ): 1201 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster EM, Bickman L. An evaluator’s guide to detecting attrition problems. Eval Rev. 1996; 20 ( 6 ): 695 – 723.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedeker D, Gibbons RD, Waternaux C. Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: comparing time-related contrasts between two groups. J Educ Behav Stat. 1999; 24 ( 1 ): 70 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarke S. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998; 51 ( 3 ): 253 – 63.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1553-2712.2008.00033.x.pdf
Size:
123.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.