Tracking Inner City Substance Users from the Emergency Department: How Many Contacts Does It Take?
dc.contributor.author | Cunningham, Rebecca M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Walton, Maureen A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tripathi, Shanti P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Outman, Ryan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Murray, Regan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Booth, Brenda M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T20:51:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T20:51:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-02 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Cunningham, Rebecca; Walton, Maureen A.; Tripathi, Shanti P.; Outman, Ryan; Murray, Regan; Booth, Brenda M. (2008). "Tracking Inner City Substance Users from the Emergency Department: How Many Contacts Does It Take?." Academic Emergency Medicine 15(2): 136-143. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73960> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-2712 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73960 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18275443&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 126685 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2008 Blackwell Publishing, Inc | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cocaine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Alcohol | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Emergency Department | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Research Methodology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Attrition | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Longitudinal | en_US |
dc.title | Tracking Inner City Substance Users from the Emergency Department: How Many Contacts Does It Take? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18275443 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73960/1/j.1553-2712.2008.00033.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00033.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Academic Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Longabaugh R, Woolard RE, Nirenberg TD, et al. Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department. J Stud Alcohol. 2001; 62 ( 6 ): 806 – 16. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Woolard RH, Carty K, Wirtz P, et al. Research fundamentals: follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: addressing subject attrition. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 859 – 66. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown SS. Drawing women into prenatal care. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989; 21 ( 2 ): 73 – 80. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McArdle JJ, Hamagami F. Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. Exp Aging Res. 1992; 18 ( 3–4 ): 145 – 66. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mazumdar S, Liu KS, Houck PR, Reynolds CF III. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal clinical trials: coping with the challenge of missing values. J Psychiatr Res. 1999; 33 ( 2 ): 87 – 95. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wu MC, Albert PS, Wu BU. Adjusting for drop-out in clinical trials with repeated measures: design and analysis issues. Stat Med. 2001; 20 ( 1 ): 93 – 108. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ribsil K, Walton MA, Mowbray CT, Luke DA, Davidson WI, Boots-Miller BJ. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Eval Program Plann. 1996; 19: 1 – 25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Twitchell GR, Hertzog CA, Klein JL, Schuckit MA. The anatomy of a follow-up. Br J Addict. 1992; 87 ( 9 ): 1327 – 33. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bernstein E, Bernstein J, Levenson S. Project ASSERT: an ED-based intervention to increase access to primary care, preventive services, and the substance abuse treatment system. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 30: 181 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Capaldi D, Patterson GR. An approach to the problem of recruitment and retention rates for longitudinal research. Behav Assess. 1987; 9: 169 – 87. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mello MJ, Nirenberg TD, Longabaugh R, et al. Emergency department brief motivational interventions for alcohol with motor vehicle crash patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45 ( 6 ): 620 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Neumann T, Neuner B, Weiss-Gerlach E, et al. The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006; 61 ( 4 ): 805 – 14. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Neuner B, Fleming M, Born R, et al. Predictors of loss to follow-up in young patients with minor trauma after screening and written intervention for alcohol in an urban emergency department. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007; 68 ( 1 ): 133 – 40. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Claus RE, Kindleberger LR, Dugan MC. Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study of substance abusers. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002; 34 ( 1 ): 69 – 74. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Marmor JK, Oliveria SA, Donahue RP, et al. Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44 ( 6 ): 531 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Booth BM, Weber JE, Walton MA, et al. Characteristics of cocaine users presenting to an emergency department chest pain observation unit. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 329 – 37. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cunningham RM, Walton MA, Tripathi SP, Weber J, Maio RF, Booth BM. Past year violence typologies among patients with cocaine related chest pain. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007; 33 ( 4 ): 571 – 82. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Michigan Department of Community Health. Census 2000. 2002. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Self-report issues in alcohol abuse: State of the art and future directions. Behav Assess. 1990; 12: 91 – 106. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Babor TF, Kranzler HR, Lauerman RJ. Early detection of harmful alcohol consumption: comparison of clinical, laboratory, and self-report screening procedures. Addict Behav. 1989; 14 ( 2 ): 139 – 57. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hser YI, Maglione M, Boyle K. Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients, and arrestees. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999; 25 ( 1 ): 81 – 91. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith GR, Burnam MA, Mosley CL, Hollenberg JA, Mancino M, Grimes W. Reliability and validity of the substance abuse outcomes module. Psychiatr Serv. 2006; 57 ( 10 ): 1452 – 60. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV Draft Criteria. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1993. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller WR, Tonigan JS, Longbaugh R. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInc): An instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 4. DHHS Publication No. 95–3911. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1995. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith GR, Burnam MA, Mosley CL, Hollenberg JA, Mancino M, Grimes W. Measuring substance abuse treatment and outcomes: the reliability and validity of the Substance Abuse Outcomes Module. Psychiatr Serv. 2006; 57: 1452 – 60. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cottler LB, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview. Br J Addict. 1989; 84 ( 7 ): 801 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9 ( 3 ): 199 – 213. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hansen WB, Tobler NS, Graham JW. Attrition in substance abuse prevention research: a meta-analysis of 85 longitudinally followed cohorts. Eval Rev. 1990; 14 ( 6 ): 677 – 85. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Walton MA, Ramanathan CS, Reischl TM. Tracking substance abusers in longitudinal research: understanding follow-up contact difficulty. Am J Commun Psychol. 1998; 26 ( 2 ): 233 – 53. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nemes S, Wish E, Wraight B, Messina N. Correlates of treatment follow-up difficulty. Subst Use Misuse. 2002; 37 ( 1 ): 19 – 45. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Scott CK. A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 74 ( 1 ): 21 – 36. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Digiusto E, Panjari M, Gibson A, Rea F. Follow-up difficulty: correlates and relationship with outcome in heroin dependence treatment in the NEPOD study. Addict Behav. 2006; 31 ( 7 ): 1201 – 10. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Foster EM, Bickman L. An evaluator’s guide to detecting attrition problems. Eval Rev. 1996; 20 ( 6 ): 695 – 723. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hedeker D, Gibbons RD, Waternaux C. Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: comparing time-related contrasts between two groups. J Educ Behav Stat. 1999; 24 ( 1 ): 70 – 93. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Darke S. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998; 51 ( 3 ): 253 – 63. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.