Management of Intrathecal Catheter-Tip Inflammatory Masses: A Consensus Statement
Hassenbusch, Samuel; Burchiel, Kim; Coffey, Robert J.; Cousins, Michael J.; Deer, Tim; Hahn, Marc B.; Pen, Stuart Du; Follett, Kenneth A.; Krames, Elliot; Rogers, James N.; Sagher, Oren; Staats, Peter S.; Wallace, Mark; Willis, Kenneth Dean
2002-12
Citation
Hassenbusch, Samuel; Burchiel, Kim; Coffey, Robert J.; Cousins, Michael J.; Deer, Tim; Hahn, Marc B.; Pen, Stuart Du; Follett, Kenneth A.; Krames, Elliot; Rogers, James N.; Sagher, Oren; Staats, Peter S.; Wallace, Mark; Willis, Kenneth Dean (2002). " Management of Intrathecal Catheter-Tip Inflammatory Masses: A Consensus Statement." Pain Medicine 3(4): 313-323. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75020>
Abstract
In a companion article, we synthesized current clinical and preclinical data to formulate hypotheses about the etiology of drug administration catheter-tip inflammatory masses. In this article, we communicate our recommendations for the detection, treatment, mitigation, and prevention of such masses. Methods. We reviewed published and unpublished case reports and our own experiences to find methods to diagnose and treat catheter-tip inflammatory masses in a manner that minimized adverse neurological sequelae. We also formulated hypotheses about theoretical ways to mitigate, and possibly, prevent the formation of such masses. Results. Human cases have occurred only in patients with chronic pain who received intrathecal opioid drugs, alone or mixed with other drugs, or in patients who received agents that were not labeled for long-term intrathecal use. Most patients had noncancer pain owing to their large representation among the population with implanted pumps. Such patients also had a longer life expectancy and exposure to intrathecal drugs, and they received higher daily doses than patients with cancer pain. Clues to diagnosis included the loss of analgesic drug effects accompanied by new, gradually progressive neurological symptoms and signs. When a mass was diagnosed before it filled the spinal canal or before it caused severe neurological symptoms, open surgery to remove the mass often was not required. Anecdotal reports and the authors' experiences suggest that cessation of drug administration through the affected catheter was followed by shrinkage or disappearance of the mass over a period of 2-5 months. Conclusions. Attentive follow-up and maintenance of an index of suspicion should permit timely diagnosis, minimally invasive treatment, and avoidance of neurological injury from catheter-tip inflammatory masses. Whenever it is feasible, positioning the catheter in the lumbar thecal sac and/or keeping the daily intrathecal opioid dose as low as possible for as long possible may mitigate the seriousness, and perhaps, reduce the incidence of such inflammatory masses.Publisher
Blackwell Science Inc
ISSN
1526-2375 1526-4637
Other DOIs
PMID
15099236
Types
Article
URI
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15099236&dopt=citationMetadata
Show full item recordRemediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.