Show simple item record

Management of Intrathecal Catheter-Tip Inflammatory Masses: A Consensus Statement

dc.contributor.authorHassenbusch, Samuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurchiel, Kimen_US
dc.contributor.authorCoffey, Robert J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCousins, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeer, Timen_US
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Marc B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPen, Stuart Duen_US
dc.contributor.authorFollett, Kenneth A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKrames, Ellioten_US
dc.contributor.authorRogers, James N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSagher, Orenen_US
dc.contributor.authorStaats, Peter S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorWillis, Kenneth Deanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:59:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2002-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationHassenbusch, Samuel; Burchiel, Kim; Coffey, Robert J.; Cousins, Michael J.; Deer, Tim; Hahn, Marc B.; Pen, Stuart Du; Follett, Kenneth A.; Krames, Elliot; Rogers, James N.; Sagher, Oren; Staats, Peter S.; Wallace, Mark; Willis, Kenneth Dean (2002). " Management of Intrathecal Catheter-Tip Inflammatory Masses: A Consensus Statement." Pain Medicine 3(4): 313-323. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75020>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-2375en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-4637en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75020
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15099236&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIn a companion article, we synthesized current clinical and preclinical data to formulate hypotheses about the etiology of drug administration catheter-tip inflammatory masses. In this article, we communicate our recommendations for the detection, treatment, mitigation, and prevention of such masses. Methods. We reviewed published and unpublished case reports and our own experiences to find methods to diagnose and treat catheter-tip inflammatory masses in a manner that minimized adverse neurological sequelae. We also formulated hypotheses about theoretical ways to mitigate, and possibly, prevent the formation of such masses. Results. Human cases have occurred only in patients with chronic pain who received intrathecal opioid drugs, alone or mixed with other drugs, or in patients who received agents that were not labeled for long-term intrathecal use. Most patients had noncancer pain owing to their large representation among the population with implanted pumps. Such patients also had a longer life expectancy and exposure to intrathecal drugs, and they received higher daily doses than patients with cancer pain. Clues to diagnosis included the loss of analgesic drug effects accompanied by new, gradually progressive neurological symptoms and signs. When a mass was diagnosed before it filled the spinal canal or before it caused severe neurological symptoms, open surgery to remove the mass often was not required. Anecdotal reports and the authors' experiences suggest that cessation of drug administration through the affected catheter was followed by shrinkage or disappearance of the mass over a period of 2-5 months. Conclusions. Attentive follow-up and maintenance of an index of suspicion should permit timely diagnosis, minimally invasive treatment, and avoidance of neurological injury from catheter-tip inflammatory masses. Whenever it is feasible, positioning the catheter in the lumbar thecal sac and/or keeping the daily intrathecal opioid dose as low as possible for as long possible may mitigate the seriousness, and perhaps, reduce the incidence of such inflammatory masses.en_US
dc.format.extent545442 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2002 American Academy of Pain Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherComplicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherGranulomaen_US
dc.subject.otherInflammatory Massen_US
dc.subject.otherIntraspinal Catheteren_US
dc.subject.otherIntrathecal Drugsen_US
dc.subject.otherMorphineen_US
dc.subject.otherPainen_US
dc.titleManagement of Intrathecal Catheter-Tip Inflammatory Masses: A Consensus Statementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMedtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Center for Pain Relief, Charleston, West Virginia;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFort Worth, Texas;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSwedish Hospital Pain Management, Seattle, Washington;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPacific Pain Treatment Center, San Francisco, California;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, California;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAlabama Pain Center, Huntsville, Alabamaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15099236en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75020/1/j.1526-4637.2002.02055.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02055.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorth RB, Cutchis PN, Epstein JA, et al. Spinal cord compression complicating subarachnoid infusion of morphine: Case report and laboratory experience. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 778 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoffey RJ, Burchiel K. Inflammatory mass lesions associated with intrathecal drug infusion catheters: Report and observations on 41 patients. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 78 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYaksh T, Hassenbusch S, Burchiel K, et al. Inflammatory masses associated with intrathecal drug infusion: A review of preclinical evidence and human data. Pain Med 2002; 3: 300 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoffey RJ, Burchiel K. Inflammatory mass lesions associated with intrathecal drug infusion catheters: Report and observations on 41 cases Abstract. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBidlack JM, Hemmick LM. Morphine enhancement of mitogen-induced T-cell proliferation. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990; 328: 405 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChuang LF, Killam KF Jr, Chuang RY. Opioid dependency and T-helper cell functions in rhesus monkey. In Vivo 1993; 7: 159 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMagazine HI, Liu Y, Bilfinger TV, et al. Morphine-induced conformational changes in human monocytes, granulocytes, and endothelial cells and in invertebrate immunocytes and microglia are mediated by nitric oxide. J Immunol 1996; 156: 4845 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson CJ, Lysle DT. Morphine modulation of the contact hypersensitivity response: characterization of immunological changes. Clin Immunol 2001; 98: 370 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefano GB. Autoimmunovascular regulation: Morphine and anandamide and ancondamide stimulated nitric oxide release. J Neuroimmunol 1998; 83: 70 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinghal PC, Shan Z, Garg P, et al. Morphine modulates migration of monocytes. Nephron 1996; 73: 526 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChuang LF, Killam KF Jr, Chuang RY. Induction and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases of human lymphocytes as one of the signaling pathways of the immunomodulatory effects of morphine sulfate. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 26815 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBejjani GK, Karim NO, Tzortzidis F. Intrathecal granuloma after implantation of a morphine pump: Case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1997; 48: 288 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlount JP, Remley KB, Yue SK, et al. Intrathecal granuloma complicating chronic spinal infusion of morphine. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 1996; 84: 272 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCabell KL, Taren JA, Sagher OS. Spinal cord compression by catheter granulomas in high-dose intrathecal morphine therapy: Case report. Neurosurgery 1998; 42: 1176 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldrete JA. Epidural fibrosis after permanent catheter insertion and infusion. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995; 10: 624 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrems-Dalgaard E, Just SL, Pedersen H. Encapsulated epidural catheter. CT findings. Neuroradiology 1991; 33: 81 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCherry DA, Gourlay GK. CT contrast evidence of injectate encapsulation after long-term epidural administration. Pain 1992; 49: 369 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodan BA, Cohen FL, Bean WJ, et al. Fibrous mass complicating epidural morphine infusion. Neurosurgery 1985; 16: 68 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones TF, Feler CA, Simmons BP, et al. Neurologic complications including paralysis after a medication error involving implanted intrathecal catheters. Am J Med 2002; 112: 31 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldrete JA, Vascello LA, Ghaly R, et al. Paraplegia in a patient with an intrathecal catheter and a spinal cord stimulator. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1542 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson SR, Orbegozo M, Racz G, et al. Intrathecal granuloma in patients receiving high-dose intrathecal morphine therapy: A report of two cases. Pain Pract 2001; 1: 61 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangsam A. Spinal cord compression by catheter granulomas in high-dose intrathecal morphine therapy: Case report. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 689 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett G, Serafini M, Burchiel K, et al. Evidence-based review of the literature on intrathecal delivery of pain medication. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000; 20: S12 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYaksh TL, Onofrio BM. Retrospective consideration of the doses of morphine given intrathecally by chronic infusion in 163 patients by 19 physicians. Pain 1987; 31: 211 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreitz D, Franck A, Nordell B. On the pulsatile nature of intracranial and spinal CSF-circulation demonstrated by MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1993; 34: 321 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomsen C, St hlberg F, Stubgaard M, et al. Fourier analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities: MR imaging study. The Scandinavian Flow Group. Radiology 1990; 177: 659 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuchard M, Lanning R, North R, et al. Neurologic sequelae of intraspinal drug delivery systems: Results of a survey of American implanters of implantable drug delivery systems. Neuromodulation 1998; 1: 137 48.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.