View Item 

Show simple item record

Establishing the Scope and Methodological Approach to Out-of-hospital Outcomes and Effectiveness Research
dc.contributor.authorKeim, Samuel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSpaite, Daniel W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMaio, Ronald F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarrison, Herbert G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDesmond, Jeffrey S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGregor, Mary Annen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Malley, Patricia J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStiell, Ian G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCayten, C. Geneen_US
dc.contributor.authorChew, John L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMacKenzie, Ellen J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, David R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:00:14Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2004-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationKeim, Samuel M.; Spaite, Daniel W.; Maio, Ronald F.; Garrison, Herbert G.; Desmond, Jeffrey S.; Gregor, Mary Ann; O'Malley, Patricia J.; Stiell, Ian G.; Cayten, C. Gene; Chew, John L.; MacKenzie, Ellen J.; Miller, David R. (2004). "Establishing the Scope and Methodological Approach to Out-of-hospital Outcomes and Effectiveness Research." Academic Emergency Medicine 11(10): 1067-1073. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75033>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75033
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15466150&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstract: Outcomes research offers out-of-hospital medicine a valuable methodology for studying the effectiveness of services provided in the out-of hospital setting. A clear understanding of the history and constructs of outcomes research is necessary for its integration into emergency medical services research. This report describes the conceptual framework of outcomes research and key methodological considerations for the successful implementation of out-of-hospital outcomes research. Illustrations of the specific applications of outcomes research and implications to existing methodologies are given, as well as suggestions for improved interdisciplinary research.en_US
dc.format.extent90087 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2004 Society for Academic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomes Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherOut-of-Hospital Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherEmergency Medical Services Researchen_US
dc.titleEstablishing the Scope and Methodological Approach to Out-of-hospital Outcomes and Effectiveness Researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherArizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NCen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPediatric Emergency Services, Massachusetts General Hospital and Emergency Medical Services for Children, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Emergency Medicine and the Loeb Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute for Trauma and Emergency Care, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEMSSTAR Group, Annapolis, MDen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MDen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHealthSpan Transportation Services and Allina Health System, St. Paul, MNen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15466150en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75033/1/j.aem.2004.04.014.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1197/j.aem.2004.04.014en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration. EMS Outcome Evaluation: Key Issues and Future Directions. Proceedings from the NHTSA Workshop on Methodologies for Measuring Morbidity Outcomes in EMS; Washington, DC, April 11–12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaio RF, Garrison HG, Spaite DW et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project I (EMSOP I): prioritizing conditions for outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33: 423 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallaham M. Quantifying the scanty science of prehospital emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 30: 785 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoenig KL. Quo vadis: “scoop and run,”“stay and treat,” or “treat and street?” [commentary]. Acad Emerg Med. 1995; 2: 477 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoenig KL. Unscheduled access to health care: reengineering the 911 system. Acad Emerg Med. 1996; 3: 986 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReines, HD, Bartlett, RL, Chudy, NE, Kiragu, KR, McKnew, MA. Is advanced life support appropriate for victims of motor vehicle accidents: the South Carolina Highway Trauma Project. J Trauma. 1988; 28: 563 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, JP, Bodai, BI, Hill, AS, Frey, CF. Prehospital stabilization of critically injured patients: a failed concept. J Trauma. 1985; 25: 65 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpaite, DW, Criss, EA, Valenzuela, TD, Guisto, J. Emergency medical services systems research: problems of the past, challenges of the future. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 26: 146 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeidel JS, Henderson D, Tittle S et al. Priorities for research in emergency medical services for children: results of a consensus conference. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 33: 206 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStiell IG, Wells GA, Spaite DW et al. The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Study II: rationale and methodology for trauma and respiratory distress patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34: 256 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor RE, Cone DC, DE Lorenzo RA et al. EMS systems: foundations of the future. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 46 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaskin IE, Makian CW. Medical treatment effectiveness research: a view from inside the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Eval Health Prof. 1991; 14: 161 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelman AS. Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 1220 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoper, WL, Winkenwerder, W, Hackbarth, GM, Krakauer, H. Effectiveness in health care: an initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 1197 – 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelbridge TR, Bailey B, Chew JL et al. EMS agenda for the future: where we are … where we want to be. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 31: 251 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Emergency Medical Services: Agenda for the Future. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation 1996, publication no. DOT HS 808 441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpaite DW, Maio R, Garrison HG et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project II (EMSOP II): developing the foundation and conceptual models for out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37: 657 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrison HG, Maio RF, Spaite DW et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) III: the role of risk adjustment for out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 79 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaio RF, Garrison HG, Spaite DW et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) IV: pain measurement in out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 172 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeim SM, Spaite DW, Maio RF et al. Risk adjustment and outcome measures for out-of-hospital respiratory distress. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 1074 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewin Group. The Outcome of Outcomes Research at AHCPR: Final Report. AHCPR Publication no. 99–R044.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStryer, D, Tunis, S, Hubbard, H, Clancy, C. The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade. Health Serv Res. 2000; 35: 977 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPherson, K, Wennberg, JE, Hovind, OB, Clifford, P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307: 1310 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeape, LL, Park, RE, Solomon, DH, Chassin, MR, Kosecoff, J, Brook, RH. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? JAMA. 1990; 263: 669 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChassin MR, Kosecoff J, Park RE et al. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA. 1987; 258: 2533 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEddy DM, Billings J. The quality of medical evidence: implications for quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1998; 7: 19 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClancy CN, Eisenberg JM. Outcomes research at the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Dis Man Clin Outcomes. 1998; 3: 72 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Identifying health technologies that work: searching for evidence. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Sept 1994, 0TA-H-608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumberg MS. Risk adjusting health care outcomes: a methodological review. Med Care Rev. 1986; 43: 351 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeyo RA, Patrick DL. The significance of treatment effects: the clinical perspective. Med Care. 1995; 33 ( 4 suppl ): AS286 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray BH. The legislative battle over health services research. Health Aff (Millwood). 1992; 11: 38 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHornberg J, Wrone E. When to base clinical policies on observational versus randomized trial data. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 697 – 703.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowe, NR, Turner, JA, Maklan, CW, Ersek, M. Alternative methods for formal literature review and meta-analysis in CPR patient outcomes research teams. Med Care. 1994; 32 ( 7 suppl ): JS22 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReinhardt U. The social perspective. In: Heithoff K ( ed ). Effectiveness and Outcomes in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWennberg J. Dealing with medical practice variation: a proposal for action. Health Aff (Millwood). 1984; 3: 6 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonobedian, A, Elinson, J, Spitzer, W, Tarlow, A. Advances in health assessment conference discussion panel. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40 ( suppl 1 ): 183s – 91s.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. London: Williams and Wilkins, 1996, p 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendelson, DN, Goodman, CS, Ahn, R, Rubin, RJ. Outcomes and effectiveness research in the private sector. Health Aff (Millwood). 1998; 17: 75 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpaite, DW, Criss, EA, Valenzuela, TD, Meislin, HW. Prehospital advanced life support for major trauma: critical need for clinical trials. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32: 480 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpaite DW, Benoit R, Brown D et al. Uniform prehospital data elements and definitions: a report from the uniform prehospital emergency medical services data conference. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25: 525 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpaite DW, Valenzuela TD, Meislin HW. Barriers to EMS system evaluation–problems associated with field data collection. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1993; 8: S35 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarsen, MP, Eisenberg, MS, Cummins, RO, Hallstrom, AP. Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model. Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 1652 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValenzuela, TD, Roe, DJ, Nichol, G, Clark, LL, Spaite, DW, Hardman, RG. Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1206 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWayne, MA, Racht, EM, Aghababian, RV, Kudenchuk, PJ, Ornato, JP, Slovis, CM. Prehospital management of cardiac arrest: how useful are vasopressor and antiarrhythmic drugs? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002; 6: 72 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandycke C, Martens P. High dose versus standard dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest–meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2000; 45: 161 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNolan JP, DE Latorre FJ, Steen PA et al. Advanced life support drugs: do they really work? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002; 8: 212 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson K, Roberts I. Medical anti-shock trousers (pneumatic anti-shock garments) for circulatory support in patients with trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 ( 1 ): AN 00075320-100000000-01248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, S, Cooke, M, Morrell, R, Bridge, P, Allan, T. Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMeRG). A systematic review of the evidence supporting the use of priority dispatch of emergency ambulances. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002; 6: 42 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStiell I, Nichol G, Wells G et al. OPALS Study Group. Health-related quality of life is better for cardiac arrest survivors who received citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1939 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStiell IG, Wells GA, Field BJ et al. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II. JAMA. 1999; 281: 1175 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNichol G, Stiell IG, Blackburn J et al. OPALS Study Group. Quality of life outcomes for respiratory distress patients treated by EMS, [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDE Maio, VJ, Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Spaite, DW. OPALS Study Group. Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 42: 242 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpaite, DW, Criss, EA, Valenzuela, TD, Meislin, HW, Hinsberg, P. A prospective evaluation of prehospital patient assessment by direct in-field observation: failure of ALS personnel to measure vital signs. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1990; 5: 325 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMears G, Ornato JP, Dawson DE. Emergency medical services information systems and a future EMS national database. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002; 6: 123 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational EMS Information System (NEMSIS). Available at: http://:www.nemsis.org. Accessed Mar 17, 2004.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.aem.2004.04.014.pdf
Size:
87.97KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.