View Item 

Show simple item record

STATISTICAL TESTS FOR TAXONOMIC DISTINCTIVENESS FROM OBSERVATIONS OF MONOPHYLY

dc.contributor.authorRosenberg, Noah A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:06:56Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:06:56Z
dc.date.issued2007-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationRosenberg, Noah A. (2007). "STATISTICAL TESTS FOR TAXONOMIC DISTINCTIVENESS FROM OBSERVATIONS OF MONOPHYLY." Evolution 61(2): 317-323. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75138>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0014-3820en_US
dc.identifier.issn1558-5646en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75138
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17348942&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent152246 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 The Society for the Study of Evolutionen_US
dc.subject.otherCoalescenten_US
dc.subject.otherGenealogical Species Concepten_US
dc.subject.otherGene Treesen_US
dc.subject.otherPhylogeographyen_US
dc.titleSTATISTICAL TESTS FOR TAXONOMIC DISTINCTIVENESS FROM OBSERVATIONS OF MONOPHYLYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Human Genetics, Bioinformatics Program, and the Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2218en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE-mail: rnoah@umich.eduen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17348942en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75138/1/j.1558-5646.2007.00023.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00023.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEvolutionen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldous, D. J. 2001. Stochastic models and descriptive statistics for phylogenetic trees, from Yule to today. Stat. Sci. 16: 23 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvise, J. C., and R. M. Ball. 1990. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 45 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaum, D., and K. L. Shaw. 1995. Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. Pp. 289 – 303, in P. C. Hoch and A. G. Stephenson, eds. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, J. K. M. 1994. Probabilities of evolutionary trees. Syst. Biol. 43: 78 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, E. F. 1971. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Prob. 3: 44 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball, and J. R. deWaard. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 313 – 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHein, J., M. H. Schierup, and C. Wiuf. 2005. Gene genealogies, variation and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHickerson, M. J., C. P. Meyer, and C. Moritz. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Syst. Biol. 55: 729 – 739.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHudson, R. R., and J. A. Coyne. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56: 1557 – 1565.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuelsenbeck, J. P., D. M. Hillis, and R. Nielsen. 1996. A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45: 546 – 558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, J. A., R. T. Watson, and D. P. Mindell. 2005. Prioritizing species conservation: does the Cape Verde kite exist? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 1365 – 1371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrings, M., A. Stone, R. W. Schmitz, H. Krainitzki, M. Stoneking, and S. PÄÄbo. 1997. Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell 90: 19 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaddison, W. P., and M. Slatkin. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45: 1184 – 1197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer, C. P., and G. Paulay. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3: 2229 – 2238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoritz, C. 1994. Defining “evolutionary significant units” for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 373 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoritz, C., and C. Cicero. 2004. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2: 1529 – 1531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNordborg, M. 1998. On the probability of Neanderthal ancestry. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63: 1237 – 1240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNordborg, M.. 2003. Coalescent theory. 2nd ed. Pp. 602 – 635 in D. J. Balding, M. Bishop, and C. Cannings, eds. Handbook of statistical genetics. Wiley, Chichester, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg, N. A. 2003. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution 57: 1465 – 1477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg, N. A.. 2006. The mean and variance of the numbers of r -pronged nodes and r -caterpillars in Yule-generated genealogical trees. Ann. Comb. 10: 129 – 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, K. L. 1998. Species and the diversity of natural groups. Pp. 44 – 56 in D. J. Howard and S. J. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlowinski, J. B., and C. Guyer. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. Am. Nat. 134: 907 – 921.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteel, M., and A. McKenzie. 2001. Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models. Math. Biosci. 170: 91 – 112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteiper, M. E. 2006. Population history, biogeography, and taxonomy of orangutans (Genus: Pongo ) based on a population genetic meta-analysis of multiple loci. J. Hum. Evol. 50: 509 – 522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisrock, D. W., H. B. Shaffer, B. L. Storz, S. R. Storz, and S. R. Voss. 2006. Multiple nuclear gene sequences identify phylogenetic species boundaries in the rapidly radiating clade of Mexican ambystomatid salamanders. Mol. Ecol. 15: 2489 – 2503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis. F. R. S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 213: 21 – 87.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1558-5646.2007.00023.x.pdf
Size:
148.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.