Show simple item record

Shear Strength and Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete and High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete Low-Rise Walls Subjected to Displacement Reversals.

dc.contributor.authorAthanasopoulou, Adamantiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-03T15:46:55Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-06-03T15:46:55Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75952
dc.description.abstractThe use of High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (HPFRC) in low-rise walls was investigated as a means to simplify reinforcement detailing while enhancing overall seismic performance and damage tolerance. Nine walls with shear span-to-length ratio of either 1.2 or 1.5 and shear stress demands ranging from 4.4√(f_c^' ) to 9.4√(f_c^' ) (psi) were tested under displacement reversals. Four of the walls were constructed with regular concrete (RC) and designed according to the seismic provisions of the 2005 ACI Code. The HPFRC walls were detailed with reduced web reinforcement and little or no confinement in the boundary regions. In addition, the wall-foundation interface in most HPFRC walls was strengthen with dowel bars to prevent early damage localization due to the lack of fibers crossing this section. The HPFRC materials were reinforced with either hooked steel fibers (1.5% or 2% volume fraction) or Spectra fibers (2% volume fraction). The HPFRC specimens exhibited drift capacities equal to or larger than those of the companion RC specimens (1.5%-3.0% in HPFRC walls versus 1.5%-2.1% in RC walls), the larger drift capacities being associated with lower shear stress demands. The RC walls generally exhibited extensive damage in the boundary regions, followed by substantial sliding along the base. Failure in most of the HPFRC walls consisted of the wide opening of and sliding along a flexural crack at the end of the dowel reinforcement. The HPFRC specimens also exhibited superior damage tolerance compared to the RC specimens with a much denser array of narrow cracks and lack of concrete spalling for drifts below 2.0%. No indication of early concrete crushing or buckling of the main vertical reinforcement was observed in the HPFRC specimens. The test results also demonstrated the need for dowel reinforcement to strengthen the cold joint at the HPFRC wall-foundation interface and prevent a premature sliding shear failure. A nearly linear shear strength increase with an increase in the total area of vertical reinforcement was observed for both the RC and HPFRC walls. The contribution of the HPFRC material to wall shear strength was estimated to be in the order of 4.5√(f_c^' ) (psi).en_US
dc.format.extent6846206 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectReinforced Concreteen_US
dc.subjectStructural Wallsen_US
dc.subjectFiber Reinforced Concreteen_US
dc.subjectDisplacement Reversalsen_US
dc.subjectShear Strengthen_US
dc.subjectDrift Capacityen_US
dc.titleShear Strength and Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete and High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete Low-Rise Walls Subjected to Displacement Reversals.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberParra-Montesinos, Gustavo J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEl-Tawil, Sherifen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWight, James K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWineman, Alan S.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCivil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75952/1/mantia_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.