View Item 

Show simple item record

Computerâ aided detection of retained surgical needles from postoperative radiographs
dc.contributor.authorSengupta, Aunnasha
dc.contributor.authorHadjiiski, Lubomir
dc.contributor.authorChan, Heang‐ping
dc.contributor.authorCha, Kenny
dc.contributor.authorChronis, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorMarentis, Theodore C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T22:01:50Z
dc.date.available2018-03-01T16:43:51Zen
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.identifier.citationSengupta, Aunnasha; Hadjiiski, Lubomir; Chan, Heang‐ping ; Cha, Kenny; Chronis, Nikolaos; Marentis, Theodore C. (2017). "Computerâ aided detection of retained surgical needles from postoperative radiographs." Medical Physics (1): 180-191.
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405
dc.identifier.issn2473-4209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136033
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherradiographs
dc.subject.otherretained surgical needles
dc.subject.otherComputerâ aided detection (CAD)
dc.titleComputerâ aided detection of retained surgical needles from postoperative radiographs
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136033/1/mp12011.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136033/2/mp12011_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mp.12011
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Physics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgin GJ, Ph.D. Thesis, Pittsburgh: Carnegieâ Mellon University: 1981.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEgorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 13 â 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 229 â 235.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHadjiiski L, Marentis TC, Chaudhury AR, Rondon L, Chronis N, Chan HP. Computer aided detection of surgical retained foreign object for prevention. Med Phys. 2015; 42: 1213 â 1222.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolpi D, Sarhan MH, Ghotbi R, Navab N, Mateus D, Demirci S. Online tracking of interventional devices for endovascular aortic repair. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 10: 773 â 781.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa Y, Gogin N, Cathier P et al. Realâ time xâ ray fluoroscopyâ based catheter detection and tracking for cardiac electrophysiology interventions. Med Phys. 2013; 40: 071902.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMilletari F, Navab N, Fallavollita P, Automatic detection of multiple and overlapping EP catheters in fluoroscopic sequences. Int Conf Med Image Comput Computâ Assist Interv. 8151: 371 â 379 ( 2013a ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMilletari F, Belagiannis V, Navab N, Fallavollita P. Fully automatic catheter localization in Câ arm images using l1â sparse coding. Med Image Comput Computâ Assist Interv. 2013b; 17: 570 â 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgam G, Gan L, Moric M, Gluncic V, Automated Identification of Retained Surgical Items in Radiological Images, In Medical Imaging 2015: Pacs and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations, edited by Cook TS, Zhang J 2015, Vol. 9418.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsiyanbola B, Chao CW, Lewin JS, Etienneâ Cummings R, Modified mapâ seeking circuit: use of computer aided detection in locating postoperative retained foreign bodies. J Surg Res. 175; E47E52 2012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacilquham MD, Riley RG, Grossberg P. Identifying lost surgical needles using radiographic techniques. AORN J. 2003; 78: 73 â 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDougherty G. Digital image processing for medical applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965; 7: 308 â 313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE. Convergence properties of the Nelderâ Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optim. 1998; 9: 112 â 147.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetrick N, Sahiner B, Armato SG III et al. Evaluation of computerâ aided detection and diagnosis systems a). Med Phys. 2013; 40: 087001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrem RF, Schoonjans JM. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computerâ aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol. 2001; 56: 150 â 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computerâ aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: 20 â 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegge D, Monica PD, Galatola G et al., Efficacy of computerâ aided detection as a second reader for 6â 9â mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial. Radiology. 2013; 266: 168 â 176
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
mp12011.pdf
Size:
971.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
mp12011_am.pdf
Size:
1.258MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.