Evaluating Northern Hemisphere Growing Season Net Carbon Flux in Climate Models Using Aircraft Observations
Loechli, Morgan; Stephens, Britton B.; Commane, Roisin; Chevallier, Frédéric; McKain, Kathryn; Keeling, Ralph F.; Morgan, Eric J.; Patra, Prabir K.; Sargent, Maryann R.; Sweeney, Colm; Keppel-Aleks, Gretchen
2023-02
Citation
Loechli, Morgan; Stephens, Britton B.; Commane, Roisin; Chevallier, Frédéric ; McKain, Kathryn; Keeling, Ralph F.; Morgan, Eric J.; Patra, Prabir K.; Sargent, Maryann R.; Sweeney, Colm; Keppel-Aleks, Gretchen (2023). "Evaluating Northern Hemisphere Growing Season Net Carbon Flux in Climate Models Using Aircraft Observations." Global Biogeochemical Cycles 37(2): n/a-n/a.
Abstract
Understanding terrestrial ecosystems and their response to anthropogenic climate change requires quantification of land-atmosphere carbon exchange. However, top-down and bottom-up estimates of large-scale land-atmosphere fluxes, including the northern extratropical growing season net flux (GSNF), show significant discrepancies. We developed a data-driven metric for the GSNF using atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration observations collected during the High-Performance Instrumented Airborne Platform for Environmental Research Pole-to-Pole Observations and Atmospheric Tomography Mission flight campaigns. This aircraft-derived metric is bias-corrected using three independent atmospheric inversion systems. We estimate the northern extratropical GSNF to be 5.7 ± 0.3 Pg C and use it to evaluate net biosphere productivity from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 and 6 (CMIP5 and CMIP6) models. While the model-to-model spread in the GSNF has decreased in the CMIP6 models relative to that of the CMIP5 models, there is still disagreement on the magnitude and timing of seasonal carbon uptake with most models underestimating the GSNF and overestimating the length of the growing season relative to the observations. We also use an emergent constraint approach to estimate annual northern extratropical gross primary productivity to be 56 ± 17 Pg C, heterotrophic respiration to be 25 ± 13 Pg C, and net primary productivity to be 28 ± 12 Pg C. The flux inferred from these aircraft observations provides an additional constraint on large-scale gross fluxes in prognostic Earth system models that may ultimately improve our ability to accurately predict carbon-climate feedbacks.Plain Language SummaryThe exchange of carbon between the land and atmosphere is an important part of the Earth’s climate, and this exchange might change due to human-caused climate change. However, estimates of land-atmosphere carbon fluxes made using different techniques do not agree with each other. We use atmospheric carbon dioxide observations collected during two flight campaigns to show that 5.7 Pg C is exchanged between the atmosphere and the land in the northern hemisphere during the summer growing season. This estimate is used to evaluate the performance of two generations of climate prediction models. The newer generation of models show less spread than the older generation, but there is still significant disagreement on the magnitude and timing of land-atmosphere carbon exchange among models. Most models underestimate the growing season net flux and overestimate the length of the growing season. We also use our observational estimate to reduce the spread on component fluxes of carbon exchange, namely uptake by photosynthesis and release by respiration.Key PointsAircraft observations of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are used to infer the net flux of the northern extratropical growing season net fluxThe observations suggest a larger net flux and shorter growing season than those simulated in Earth system modelsAn emergent constraint approach is used to estimate productivity and respiration fluxesPublisher
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. University of California
ISSN
0886-6236 1944-9224
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.