View Item 

Show simple item record

Developing Technical Expertise in Emergency Medicine—The Role of Simulation in Procedural Skill Acquisition
dc.contributor.authorWang, Ernest E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorQuinones, Joshuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFitch, Michael T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDooley-Hash, Suzanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorGriswold-Theodorson, Sharonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMedzon, Ronen_US
dc.contributor.authorKorley, Fredericken_US
dc.contributor.authorLaack, Torreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobinett, Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorClay, Lamonten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:47:11Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2008-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationWang, Ernest E.; Quinones, Joshua; Fitch, Michael T.; Dooley-Hash, Suzanne; Griswold-Theodorson, Sharon; Medzon, Ron; Korley, Frederick; Laack, Torrey; Robinett, Adam; Clay, Lamont (2008). "Developing Technical Expertise in Emergency Medicine—The Role of Simulation in Procedural Skill Acquisition." Academic Emergency Medicine 15(11 Proceedings of The 2008 AEM Consensus Conference: The Science of Simulation in Healthcare: Defining and Developing Clinical Expertise Guest Editors:Amy Kaji, MD, PhD David C. Cone, MD ): 1046-1057. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72919>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72919
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18785939&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent108842 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2008 Blackwell Publishing, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherTeachingen_US
dc.subject.otherEmergency Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherInstrumentationen_US
dc.subject.otherProceduresen_US
dc.titleDeveloping Technical Expertise in Emergency Medicine—The Role of Simulation in Procedural Skill Acquisitionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid18785939en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72919/1/j.1553-2712.2008.00218.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00218.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference  1.  2007 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_110/110_clinModel.pdf. Accessed Mar, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Emergency Medicine Guidelines--Procedures and Resuscitations. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_110/110_guidelines.asp. Accessed Mar, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordan GM, Silsby J, Bayley G, Cook TM The Difficult Airway Society. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62: 708 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson KM, Cook TM. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62: 388 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHesselfeldt R, Kristensen MS, Rasmussen LS. Evaluation of the airway of the SimMan full-scale patient simulator. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005; 49: 1339 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceObon M, Romagosa V, Trujillano C, Gonzalez E, Guerrero de la Rotta L, Sistac Ballarin J. [Locating the site of resistance to the endotracheal tube in fiberoptic oral intubation and maneuvers to overcome it: a mannequin simulation study]. Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion. 2007; 54: 584 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldmann K, Steinfeldt T. Acquisition of basic fiberoptic intubation skills with a virtual reality airway simulator. J Clin Anesth. 2006; 18: 173 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRowe R, Cohen RA. An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator. Anesth Analg. 2002; 95: 62 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook TM, Green C, McGrath J, Srivastava R. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of single use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62: 713 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLim TJ, Lim Y, Liu EH. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2005; 60: 180 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLim Y, Lim TJ, Liu EH. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways. Can J Anaesth. 2004; 51: 641 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2003; 50: 611 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanders J, Haas RE, Geisler M, Lupien AE. Using the human patient simulator to test the efficacy of an experimental emergency percutaneous transtracheal airway. Mil Med. 1998; 163: 544 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOvassapian A, Yelich SJ, Dykes MH, Golman ME. Learning fibreoptic intubation: use of simulators v. traditional teaching. Br J Anaesth. 1988; 61: 217 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwen H, Plummer JL. Improving learning of a clinical skill: the first year’s experience of teaching endotracheal intubation in a clinical simulation facility. Med Educ. 2002; 36: 635 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTi LK, Tan GM, Khoo SG, Chen FG. The impact of experiential learning on NUS medical students: our experience with task trainers and human-patient simulation. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006; 35: 619 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall RE, Plant JR, Bands CJ, Wall AR, Kang J, Hall CA. Human patient simulation is effective for teaching paramedic students endotracheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 850 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldmann K, Ferson DZ. Education and training in airway management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005; 19: 717 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRusso SG, Eich C, Barwing J, et al. Self-reported changes in attitude and behavior after attending a simulation-aided airway management course. J Clin Anesth. 2007; 19: 517 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis DP, Buono C, Ford J, Paulson L, Koenig W, Carrison D. The effectiveness of a novel, algorithm-based difficult airway curriculum for air medical crews using human patient simulators. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11: 72 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikendei C, Kraus B, Schrauth M, et al. Integration of role-playing into technical skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 956 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwid HA, Rooke GA, Carline J, et al. Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multiinstitutional study. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97: 1434 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarsuk D, Ziv A, Lin G, et al. Using advanced simulation for recognition and correction of gaps in airway and breathing management skills in prehospital trauma care. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 803 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKovacs G, Bullock G, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Cain E, Petrie D. A randomized controlled trial on the effect of educational interventions in promoting airway management skill maintenance. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 36: 301 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOverly FL, Sudikoff SN, Shapiro MJ. High-fidelity medical simulation as an assessment tool for pediatric residents’ airway management skills. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007; 23: 11 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParwani V, Hoffman RJ, Russell A, Bharel C, Preblick C, Hahn IH. Practicing paramedics cannot generate or estimate safe endotracheal tube cuff pressure using standard techniques. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11: 307 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffman RJ, Parwani V, Hahn IH. Experienced emergency medicine physicians cannot safely inflate or estimate endotracheal tube cuff pressure using standard techniques. Am J Emerg Med. 2006; 24: 139 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlympio MA, Whelan R, Ford RP, Saunders IC. Failure of simulation training to change residents’ management of oesophageal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 91: 312 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSagarin MJ, Barton ED, Chng YM, Walls RM. Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46: 328 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBair AE, Panacek EA, Wisner DH, Bales R, Sakles JC. Cricothyrotomy: a 5-year experience at one institution. J Emerg Med. 2003; 24: 151 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBushra JS, McNeil B, Wald DA, Schwell A, Karras DJ. A comparison of trauma intubations managed by anesthesiologists and emergency physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 66 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevitan RM, Rosenblatt B, Meiner EM, Reilly PM, Hollander JE. Alternating day emergency medicine and anesthesia resident responsibility for management of the trauma airway: a study of laryngoscopy performance and intubation success. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43: 48 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlsen J, Spilger S, Windisch T. Feasibility of obtaining family consent for teaching cricothyrotomy on the newly dead in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25: 660 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBathalon S, Dorion D, Darveau S, Martin M. Cognitive skills analysis, kinesiology, and mental imagery in the acquisition of surgical skills. J Otolaryngol. 2005; 34: 328 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiGiacomo JC, Angus LD, Gelfand BJ, Shaftan GW. Cricothyrotomy technique: standard versus the rapid four step technique. J Emerg Med. 1999; 17: 1071 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEisenburger P, Laczika K, List M, et al. Comparison of conventional surgical versus Seldinger technique emergency cricothyrotomy performed by inexperienced clinicians. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92: 687 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaumann N, Lorenz V, Schellongowski P, et al. Evaluation of Seldinger technique emergency cricothyroidotomy versus standard surgical cricothyroidotomy in 200 cadavers. Anesthesiology. 2005; 102: 7 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSulaiman L, Tighe SQ, Nelson RA. Surgical vs wire-guided cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover study of cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tube insertion. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61: 565 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes JF, Panacek EA, Sakles JC, Brofeldt BT. Comparison of 2 cricothyrotomy techniques: standard method versus rapid 4-step technique. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32: 442 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan TC, Vilke GM, Bramwell KJ, Davis DP, Hamilton RS, Rosen P. Comparison of wire-guided cricothyrotomy versus standard surgical cricothyrotomy technique. J Emerg Med. 1999; 17: 957 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVadodaria BS, Gandhi SD, McIndoe AK. Comparison of four different emergency airway access equipment sets on a human patient simulator. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 73 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFikkers BG, van Vugt S, van der Hoeven JG, van den Hoogen FJ, Marres HA. Emergency cricothyrotomy: a randomised crossover trial comparing the wire-guided and catheter-over-needle techniques. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 1008 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeane MF, Brinsfield KH, Dyer KS, Roy S, White D. A laboratory comparison of emergency percutaneous and surgical cricothyrotomy by prehospital personnel. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004; 8: 424 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacIntyre A, Markarian MK, Carrison D, Coates J, Kuhls D, Fildes JJ. Three-step emergency cricothyroidotomy. Mil Med. 2007; 172: 1228 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong DT, Prabhu AJ, Coloma M, Imasogie N, Chung FF. What is the minimum training required for successful cricothyroidotomy?: a study in mannequins. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98: 349 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohn B, Suri I, Hillermann C, Mendonca C. Comparison of cricothyroidotomy on manikin vs. simulator: a randomised cross-over study. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62: 1029 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlshaker JS, Brown CK, Arthur DC, Tek D. Animal procedure laboratory surveys: use of the animal laboratory to improve physician confidence and ability. J Emerg Med. 1989; 7: 593 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProano L, Jagminas L, Homan CS, Reinert S. Evaluation of a teaching laboratory using a cadaver model for tube thoracostomy. J Emerg Med. 2002; 23: 89 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoman CS, Viccellio P, Thode HC Jr, Fisher W. Evaluation of an emergency-procedure teaching laboratory for the development of proficiency in tube thoracostomy. Acad Emerg Med. 1994; 1: 382 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman DM, Rhee KJ, Marx JA, et al. Open thoracotomy procedural competency: validity study of teaching and assessment modalities. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 28: 641 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock EF, Lottenberg L, Flint L, Jakobsen J, Liebnitzky D. Use of a human patient simulator for the advanced trauma life support course. Am Surg. 2002; 68: 648 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall RL, Smith JS, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM, Haluck RS, Cooney RN. Use of a human patient simulator in the development of resident trauma management skills. J Trauma. 2001; 51: 17 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkenstadt H, Munoz Y, Trodler G, Blumenfeld A, Rubin O, Ziv A. Evaluation of the Trauma-Man® Simulator for Training in Chest Drain Insertion. Eur J Trauma. 2006; 32: 523 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin M, Scalabrini B, Rioux A, Xhignesse MA. Training fourth-year medical students in critical invasive skills improves subsequent patient safety. Am Surg. 2003; 69: 437 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamakrishna G, Higano ST, McDonald FS, Schultz HJ. A curricular initiative for internal medicine residents to enhance proficiency in internal jugular central venous line placement. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80: 212 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBritt RC, Reed SF, Britt LD. Central line simulation: a new training algorithm. Am Surg. 2007; 73: 680 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Sillin LF, et al. Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. Am J Surg. 2004; 187: 114 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAult MJ, Rosen BT, Ault B. The use of tissue models for vascular access training. Phase I of the procedural patient safety initiative. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 514 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacnab AJ, Macnab M. Teaching pediatric procedures: the Vancouver model for instructing Seldinger’s technique of central venous access via the femoral vein. Pediatrics. 1999; 103: E8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancis GS, Williams SV, Achord JL, et al. Clinical competence in insertion of a temporary transvenous ventricular pacemaker. A statement for physicians from the ACP/ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Privileges in Cardiology. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1913 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy JJ, Frain JP, Stephenson CJ. Training and supervision of temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion. Br J Clin Pract. 1995; 49: 126 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanchez LD, Delapena J, Kelly SP, Ban K, Pini R, Perna AM. Procedure lab used to improve confidence in the performance of rarely performed procedures. Eur J Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 29 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaufmann C, Liu A. Trauma training: virtual reality applications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001; 81: 236 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLammers RL, Temple KJ, Wagner MJ, Ray D. Competence of new emergency medicine residents in the performance of lumbar punctures. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 622 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang GC, Smith CC, Gordon CE, et al. Beyond the comfort zone: residents assess their comfort performing inpatient medical procedures. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 71 – e17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams CT, Fost N. Ethical considerations surrounding first time procedures: a study and analysis of patient attitudes toward spinal taps by students. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1992; 2: 217 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraber MA, Pierre J, Charlton M. Patient opinions and attitudes toward medical student procedures in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 1329 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2664 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M, Gordon JA. See one, do one, teach one: advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 1149 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAggarwal R, Darzi A. Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2695 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorman P, Krummel T, Webster R, Smith M, Hutchens D. A prototype haptic lumbar puncture simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000; 70: 106 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraber MA, Wyatt C, Kasparek L, Xu Y. Does simulator training for medical students change patient opinions and attitudes toward medical student procedures in the emergency department? Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 635 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJude DC, Gilbert GG, Magrane D. Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1489 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, Hunt LP, Fox R, Draycott TJ. Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1477 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrofts JF, Bartlett C, Ellis D, Hunt LP, Fox R, Draycott TJ. Management of shoulder dystocia: skill retention 6 and 12 months after training. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1069 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A. Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 1295 – 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeering S, Brown J, Hodor J, Satin AJ. Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 86 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan PJ, Pittini R, Regehr G, Marrs C, Haley MF. Evaluating teamwork in a simulated obstetric environment. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106: 907 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLentz GM, Mandel LS, Lee D, Gardella C, Melville J, Goff BA. Testing surgical skills of obstetric and gynecologic residents in a bench laboratory setting: validity and reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1462 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeth D, Ayida G, Berridge EJ, Sadler C, Strachan A. MOSES: Multidisciplinary Obstetric Simulated Emergency Scenarios. J Interprof Care. 2006; 20: 552 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Emergency Physicians. ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines-2001. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38: 470 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCounselman FL, Sanders A, Slovis CM, Danzl D, Binder LS, Perina DG. The status of bedside ultrasonography training in emergency medicine residency programs. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 37 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalen P, O’Connor R, Passarello B, et al. Fast education: a comparison of teaching models for trauma sonography. J Emerg Med. 2001; 20: 421 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitting MD, Euerle BD, Butler KH. A comparison of emergency medicine ultrasound training with guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34: 604 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMateer J, Plummer D, Heller M, et al. Model curriculum for physician training in emergency ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 23: 95 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnudson MM, Sisley AC. Training residents using simulation technology: experience with ultrasound for trauma. J Trauma. 2000; 48: 659 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonsky WL, Levine D, Mehta TS, et al. Using a sonographic simulator to assess residents before overnight call. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 35 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSites BD, Gallagher JD, Cravero J, Lundberg J, Blike G. The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004; 29: 544 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Oliveira Filho GR, Helayel PE, et al. Learning curves and mathematical models for interventional ultrasound basic skills. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106: 568 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHogle NJ, Briggs WM, Fowler DL. Documenting a learning curve and test-retest reliability of two tasks on a virtual reality training simulator in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Educ. 2007; 64: 424 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal R, Gantert WA, Hamel C, et al. Assessment of construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007; 17: 407 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 771 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007; 193: 797 – 804.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAggarwal R, Tully A, Grantcharov T, et al. Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gyn. 2006; 113: 1382 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRashid HH, Kowalewski T, Oppenheimer P, Ooms A, Krieger JN, Sweet RM. The virtual reality transurethral prostatic resection trainer: evaluation of discriminate validity. J Urol. 2007; 177: 2283 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemole GM Jr, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Neckrysh S, Charbel FT. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery. 2007; 61: 142 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, et al. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 46: 855 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerry M, Hellstrom M, Gothlin J, Reznick R, Lonn L. Endovascular training with animals versus virtual reality systems: an economic analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 19 ( 2 Pt 1 ): 233 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGomoll AH, Pappas G, Forsythe B, Warner JJ. Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36 ( 6 ): 1139 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Leary SJ, Hutchins MA, Stevenson DR, et al. Validation of a networked virtual reality simulation of temporal bone surgery. Laryngoscope. 2008; 118: 1040 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64: 361 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark J, MacRae H, Musselman LJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients. Am J Surg. 2007; 194: 205 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cog Sci. 1998; 12: 257 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers A. What is the difference? A new critique of adult learning and teaching. Leicester, UK: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE), 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerriam SB, Caffarella RS. Learning in Adulthood. A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins J. Education techniques for lifelong learning: principles of adult learning. Radiographics. 2004; 24: 1483 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch DA. Andragogy and medical education: are medical students internally motivated to learn? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2002; 7: 153 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt R, Lee T. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Chicago: Susan Fauer Company Inc., 1956.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDave RH. Developing and Writing Behavioural Objectives. Tucson, AZ: Educational Innovators Press, 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004; 79 ( 10 Suppl ): S70 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles M. The Adult Learner--A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker M, Peyton R. Teaching and Learning in Medical Practice. Rickmansworth, UK: Manicore Publishers Europe Ltd, 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang TS, Schwartz JL, Karimipour DJ, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Johnson TM. An education theory-based method to teach a procedural skill. Arch Dermatol. 2004; 140: 1357 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A. Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 697 – 705.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 549 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKovacs G. Procedural skills in medicine: linking theory to practice. J Emerg Med. 1997; 15: 387 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKopta JA. An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery. 1971; 70: 297 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Med Educ. 2006; 40: 792 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg. 1993; 165: 358 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Med Educ. 2002; 36: 628 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIssenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 1999; 282: 861 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIssenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 10 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 400 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrydges R, Carnahan H, Backstein D, Dubrowski A. Application of motor learning principles to complex surgical tasks: searching for the optimal practice schedule. J Mot Behav. 2007; 39: 40 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArthur WJ, Bennett WJ, Day E, McNelly T, Air Force Research Lab, Mesa AZ Human Effectiveness Directorate. Skill Decay: A Comparative Assessment of Training Protocols and Individual Differences in the Loss and Reacquisition of Complex Skills. Springfield, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoser DK, Coleman S. Recommendations for improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention. Heart Lung. 1992; 21: 372 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaye W, Wynne G, Marteau T, et al. An advanced resuscitation training course for preregistration house officers. J R Coll Phys Lond. 1990; 24: 51 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents’ retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med. 2006; 81 ( 10 Suppl ): S9 – S12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuduvalli PM, Jervis A, Tighe SQ, Robin NM. Unanticipated difficult airway management in anaesthetised patients: a prospective study of the effect of mannequin training on management strategies and skill retention. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63: 364 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArthur WJ, Bennett WJ, Stanush P, McNelly T. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis. Hum Perform. 1998; 11: 57 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarr MJ, Institute for Defense Analysis. The Long-term Retention of Knowledge and Skills: A Cognitive and Instructional Perspective. Springfield, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiegel B, Birnbaum A, Aufderheide TP, et al. Predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skill retention. Am Heart J. 2005; 150: 927 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ. Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery. 2005; 138: 165 – 70.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1553-2712.2008.00218.x.pdf
Size:
106.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.