Show simple item record

Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer‐based epidemiologic cohorts

dc.contributor.authorWang, Lingxiao
dc.contributor.authorValliant, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yan
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T00:46:57Z
dc.date.available2022-11-01 20:46:56en
dc.date.available2021-11-02T00:46:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-30
dc.identifier.citationWang, Lingxiao; Valliant, Richard; Li, Yan (2021). "Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer‐based epidemiologic cohorts." Statistics in Medicine 40(24): 5237-5250.
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170864
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.othervariance estimation
dc.subject.otherfinite population inference
dc.subject.othernonprobability sample
dc.subject.otherpropensity score weighting
dc.subject.othersurvey sampling
dc.titleAdjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer‐based epidemiologic cohorts
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Data
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170864/1/sim9122_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170864/2/sim9122-sup-0001-supinfo.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170864/3/sim9122.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.9122
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi Y, Graubard BI, DiGaetano R. Weighting methods for population‐based case–control studies with complex sampling. J Royal Stat Soc Ser C. 2011; 60 ( 2 ): 165 ‐ 185.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins R. What makes UK Biobank special. Lancet. 2012; 379 ( 9822 ): 1173 ‐ 1174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFry A, Littlejohns TJ, Sudlow C, et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health‐related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am J Epidemiol. 2017; 186 ( 9 ): 1026 ‐ 1034.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElliott MR, Valliant R. Inference for nonprobability samples. Stat Sci. 2017; 32 ( 2 ): 249 ‐ 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen Y, Li P, Wu C. Doubly robust inference with nonprobability survey samples. J Am Stat Assoc. 2019; 115 ( 532 ): 2011 ‐ 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang L, Graubard BI, Katki H, Li Y. Improving external validity of epidemiologic cohort analyses: a kernel weighting approach. J Royal Stat Soc Ser A. 2020; 183 ( 3 ): 1293 – 1311. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12564.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang L, Graubard BI, Katki HA, Li Y. Efficient and robust propensity‐score‐based methods for population inference using epidemiologic cohorts; 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.14850.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValliant R, Dever JA. Estimating propensity adjustments for volunteer web surveys. Sociol Methods Res. 2011; 40 ( 1 ): 105 ‐ 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValliant R. Comparing alternatives for estimation from nonprobability samples. J SurvStat Methodol. 2020; 8 ( 2 ): 231 ‐ 263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBinder DA. On the variances of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. Int Stat Rev. 1983; 51 ( 3 ): 279 ‐ 292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChambers RA, Skinner CJ. Sec. 6.3 Analysis of Survey Data. New York, NY: Wiley; 2003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaumont JF. Calibrated imputation in surveys under a quasi‐model‐assisted approach. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B. 2005; 67 ( 3 ): 445 ‐ 458.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim JK, Kim JJ. Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated probability. Canadian J Stat. 2007; 35 ( 4 ): 501 ‐ 514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrewski D, Rao JN. Inference from stratified samples: properties of the linearization, jackknife and balanced repeated replication methods. Ann Stat. 1981; 9 ( 5 ): 1010 ‐ 1019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott AJ, Wild CJ. Fitting logistic models under case‐control or choice based sampling. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B. 1986; 48 ( 2 ): 170 ‐ 182.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang L. Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Analyses by Incorporating Data from Population‐Based Surveys [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland, College Park; 2020. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/26125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMassey JT. Design and estimation for the national health interview survey, 1985–94. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics; 1989.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEzzati TM, Massey JT, Waksberg J, Chu A, Maurer KR. Sample design: third National Health and nutrition examination survey. Vital Health Stat Ser 2 Data Eval Methods Res. 1992; 113: 1 ‐ 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartley HO, Rao JN, Kiefer G. Variance estimation with one unit per stratum. J Am Stat Assoc. 1969; 64 ( 327 ): 841 ‐ 851.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Health Statistics. National Death Index User’s Guide. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ndi/ndi_users_guide.pdf. Accessed April 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Health Statistics. Data Linkage Public‐Use Linked Mortality File Data Dictionary. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/datalinkage/public‐use‐2015‐linked‐mortality‐files‐data‐dictionary.pdf. Accessed April 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Health Statistic. Data Linkage Underlying and Multiple Cause of Death Codes. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/datalinkage/underlying_and_multiple_cause_of_death_codes.pdf. Accessed April 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee S, Valliant R. Estimation for volunteer panel web surveys using propensity score adjustment and calibration adjustment. Sociol Methods Res. 2009; 37 ( 3 ): 319 ‐ 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRivers D. Sampling for web surveys. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Section on Survey Research Methods; 2007; Salt Lake City, Utah.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.